Holcombe:TemporalNoise

From OpenWetWare

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 3: Line 3:
==Method==
==Method==
-Screens:
-Screens:
 +
Radius experiment: 800x600 at 160 Hz (Mitsubishi)
Radius experiment: 800x600 at 160 Hz (Mitsubishi)
 +
The rest of the experiments: 800x600 at 120 Hz (ViewSonic)  
The rest of the experiments: 800x600 at 120 Hz (ViewSonic)  

Revision as of 01:58, 30 April 2008

Members

Alex Holcombe
Sarah McIntyre
Fahed Jbarah
• Shih-Yu Lo
• Patrick Goodbourn
Lizzy Nguyen
Alumni


Technical

Skills Checklist
Python Programming
Psychopy/VisionEgg Installation Notes
R analysis,plot,stats
Statistics
Buttonbox
Verifying timing
Programming Cheat Sheets



Method

-Screens:

Radius experiment: 800x600 at 160 Hz (Mitsubishi)

The rest of the experiments: 800x600 at 120 Hz (ViewSonic)

Image:SlopesNoIntercepts.png, Image:Slopes.png

Buttonpress (sensorimotor synchronization) vs. other tasks

  • is variability consistently less than for other tasks?

Yes for ML, AH, DL poster data, by 20-30 ms. This includes dot-crossing predictive task

For data not in table above, DL in 3 different runs Image:ButtonPressTemporalNoiseDLAHoldnew.png shows low temporal noise, and AH ended up with better temporal noise (plus remarkable property of his histogram, that never late, skewed distribution; note: need to look at all 3 of his histograms)
Views
Personal tools