Holcombe:TemporalNoise

SUPA Sydney University Perception and Action Lab Primer editing help refcard

also see Holcombe:InPhaseTask

Method

-Screens:

Radius experiment: 800x600 at 160 Hz (Mitsubishi)

The rest of the experiments: 800x600 at 120 Hz (ViewSonic)

Temporal noise for every subject

These slopes are wrong for AH with buttonpress! ,

Buttonpress (sensorimotor synchronization) vs. other tasks

• is variability consistently less than for other tasks?

Yes for ML, AH, DL poster data, by 20-30 ms. This includes dot-crossing predictive task For data not in table above, DL in 3 different runs shows low temporal noise, and AH ended up with better temporal noise (plus remarkable property of his histogram, that never late, skewed distribution; note: need to look at all 3 of his histograms)