Holmesbr/plan: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 34: Line 34:


*Maybe since the shRNA construct worked so well I should clone it into a miRNA vector and test that?
*Maybe since the shRNA construct worked so well I should clone it into a miRNA vector and test that?
::Perhaps I should retest the shRNA construct once I have optimized the TE.  It might do better than 60% endogenous.


==Immunolabeling RNase H1, Top3a and POLG==
==Immunolabeling RNase H1, Top3a and POLG==
Line 41: Line 42:
*Top3a Antibody
*Top3a Antibody
::Needs to be extensively tested.
::Needs to be extensively tested.
*POLG
::Commercial Antibody works great!
===What Next?===
*Once I get the miRNA construct working ...
::I would like to try to modulate RNase H1, and observe the changes in Top3a/POLG/RNase H1 localization.  I could use the shRNA construct. 
*I have streaked out the bacteria carrying M27I-RNase H1-GFP 3 times, purifed the plasmid, and sent off for sequencing (~).  Hopefully it will come back as M27I, then I will purify close to 200 ug of plasmid and re-transfect.  Now that I believe it to be "pure" M27I-RNase H1-GFP, I hope to see only mitochondrial localization!

Revision as of 08:33, 16 June 2006

Introduction

This page is meant to keep my two mentors up-to-date on what I am working on and also help keep myself organized.

Anyone can post if they have helpful suggestions.

Specific Aims

RNAi Knockdown of RNase H1 in situ

What I have done

  • miRNA
I have 4 miRNA constructs plus a negative control miRNA construct. I have tested these against endogenous RNase H1 in 3T3 cells, but the knock-down by RT-RT-qPCR has been abysmal, with only one construct acheiving ~40% knock-down. However, this may be due to poor Transfection Efficiency.
  • Transfection Efficiency
The latest results (6/14/6) indicate that maybe I am plating 4X too many cells on Day 0 before transfecting (by FACS analysis, I was able to increase the TE from 50%to 80%).
  • Analysis of RNase H1 Knock-down by RNase H1 Activity Gel (aka Renaturation Assay)
I harvested a known quanity of Hos and 3T3 cells 5 days previous, pelleted and froze at -20. I ran a seriel dilution of these sample as well as 7.6 and .76 ng of RNase H1 as a positive control. I incubated one night, and showed 0 RNase H1 activity, even in the positive control. I incubated a second night. Still no RNase H1 activity.

What Next?

Sooner than ...

  • Using the lower level of cell number, try to opimize TE and also harvest RNA to make sure enough RNA can be harvested to continue with RT-RT-qPCR
This will have to wait until after the conference since it takes two days to grow up the cells.
  • Re-do the activity gel.
It should have worked. Maybe use FRESH 3T3 and Hos samples. Also I am using M1-RNase H1-GFP & M27I-RNase H1-GFP cells.
Brad 11:28, 16 June 2006 (EDT) I am exposing to film right now.

... Later

  • Test miRNA on Exogenous RNase H1 by co-transfecting with M27-RNase H1-GFP
First I need to settle on a TE that I am happy with. So this step is indefinently put off.
  • Maybe since the shRNA construct worked so well I should clone it into a miRNA vector and test that?
Perhaps I should retest the shRNA construct once I have optimized the TE. It might do better than 60% endogenous.

Immunolabeling RNase H1, Top3a and POLG

  • RNase H1 antibody
I have settled on an antibody and condition for 3T3/Hos cell IF. The antibody can be dilute to 1:150 -> 1:200
  • Top3a Antibody
Needs to be extensively tested.
  • POLG
Commercial Antibody works great!

What Next?

  • Once I get the miRNA construct working ...
I would like to try to modulate RNase H1, and observe the changes in Top3a/POLG/RNase H1 localization. I could use the shRNA construct.
  • I have streaked out the bacteria carrying M27I-RNase H1-GFP 3 times, purifed the plasmid, and sent off for sequencing (~). Hopefully it will come back as M27I, then I will purify close to 200 ug of plasmid and re-transfect. Now that I believe it to be "pure" M27I-RNase H1-GFP, I hope to see only mitochondrial localization!