IGEM:Carnegie Mellon University/2009/Notebook/SUCCEED Survey and Peer Incentives/2014/02/04: Difference between revisions
(fix raw html notebook nav) |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|style="background-color: #EEE"|[[Image:igem-logo-150px.png|150px]]<span style="font-size:22px;"> iGEM Project name 1</span> | |style="background-color: #EEE"|[[Image:igem-logo-150px.png|150px]]<span style="font-size:22px;"> iGEM Project name 1</span> | ||
|style="background-color: #F2F2F2" align="center"| | |style="background-color: #F2F2F2" align="center"|[[File:Report.png|frameless|link={{#sub:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|0|-11}}]][[{{#sub:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|0|-11}}|Main project page]]<br />{{#if:{{#lnpreventry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}|[[File:Resultset_previous.png|frameless|link={{#lnpreventry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}]][[{{#lnpreventry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}{{!}}Previous entry]] }}{{#if:{{#lnnextentry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}|[[{{#lnnextentry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}{{!}}Next entry]][[File:Resultset_next.png|frameless|link={{#lnnextentry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}]]}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
| colspan="2"| | | colspan="2"| |
Latest revision as of 23:43, 26 September 2017
iGEM Project name 1 | Main project page Previous entry Next entry |
Entry titleMet with Alex today. We went over papers - said Babcock et al was a very good paper, should check the papers it references and the papers that cite it for next week. Also talked about two incentive schemes: 1) Give subject money (in gift cards) up front for all participants, have subject distribute gift cards & surveys to other people 2) Give 3rd person the money and "backwards distribute" Issues of trust, Alex said we don't want to come off as manipulative. Also issues of feasibility - how are we going to give only 3rd person the money? Will it be hidden from the 1st and 2nd person? Also talked about different forms of incentives - ex. just money, money in "gift" form (origami). Less focus on social incentives, group incentives & peer effects
|