IGEM:Hong Kong HKUST/June 30: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Voting) |
|||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
*Good points: extensible, applicable | *Good points: extensible, applicable | ||
*Shortcomings: too complicated | *Shortcomings: too complicated | ||
His proposal is ready in the following link: [[Image:Guangnan's Proposal.doc]] | His proposal is ready in the following link: [[Image:Guangnan's Proposal.doc]] | ||
===Jingjing's Proposal=== | ===Jingjing's Proposal=== | ||
Revision as of 09:19, 1 July 2008
General Info
From 5p.m. to 8:20p.m.
Rm 5486
Attendance: Xiuye, Qing, Jinyu, Winnie, Guangnan, Carmen, Jiahui, Tony, Wisely, Jingjing, Penny, Sung Hoi, Gladys, Vivian and King.
Announcement
After voting, we decided to use Guangnan's proposal. Probably we will focus on Part 1 (Randomizer) and Part 3 (Spatial Oscillator) first.
Contents
”Ten Commandments”
Criteria for selecting proposals: extensible, interesting, originality, innovative, involvement of every group-mate, applicable…
Guangnan's Proposal
- Randomizer
- Memorizer
- Spatial Oscillator
- Good points: extensible, applicable
- Shortcomings: too complicated
His proposal is ready in the following link: File:Guangnan's Proposal.doc
Jingjing's Proposal
- Spots and Stripes: National Flag of America
- Digital Display
- Good points: simple, easy to construct circuits
- Shortcomings: pre-defined pattern, lack of originality
Xiuye's Proposal
Taichi Pattern
- Significance: modeling of differentiated cells
- Good points: art
- Shortcomings: not easy to control, difficult to understand how those cells work
Voting
Voted by ballot
Guangnan’s proposal won most of the votes.
