IGEM:Harvard/2006/Cyanobacteria: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 8: Line 8:


* '''What is the specific goal of the project?'''
* '''What is the specific goal of the project?'''
**Biobrick KaiABC oscillator
**Biobrick KaiABC oscillator (for use in either cyanobacteria AND/OR e. coli)
***[http://www.kazusa.or.jp/cyano/WH8102/cgi-bin/orfinfo.cgi?title=Chr&name=SYNW0548&iden=1] Shows the location of kaiA,BC in WH8102 strain. 2.866kb for kaiABC + non-coding region.
***[http://www.kazusa.or.jp/cyano/WH8102/cgi-bin/orfinfo.cgi?title=Chr&name=SYNW0548&iden=1] Shows the location of kaiA,BC in WH8102 strain. 2.866kb for kaiABC + non-coding region.
***Research shows that KaiABC show oscillation independently (Nakajima et al. 2005)
***Research shows that KaiABC show oscillation independently (Nakajima et al. 2005)
Line 14: Line 14:
***Use a luciferase gene reporter, which was done in (Kondo et al. 2000)
***Use a luciferase gene reporter, which was done in (Kondo et al. 2000)
***Also can measure KaiC activity; create a chimeric protein w/GFP
***Also can measure KaiC activity; create a chimeric protein w/GFP
** Alternate phrasing, courtesy of Kit Parker - what is the "deliverable?" The thing you will point to and say "this is our project?"
**Synthesis of ~3kb KaiABC w/ codon replacement of Ala of Leu to use in E. coli
***'''Our deliverable is a (multiple?) BioBrick part(s)
***Provides backup in case direct movement of KaiABC into E. coli fails
***Codon replacement problem addressed in (link)
** '''Alternate phrasing, courtesy of Kit Parker - what is the "deliverable?" The thing you will point to and say "this is our project?"'''
***Our deliverable is a (multiple?) BioBrick part(s)
* What are two or three possible means of implementing the idea?
* What are two or three possible means of implementing the idea?
* Risk
* Risk

Revision as of 17:04, 17 June 2006

Organization Suggestions

3000bp, 11cents/base. --> synthetic

Think about these questions when preparing your project proposals for the group meeting.

For each project idea:

  • What is the specific goal of the project?
    • Biobrick KaiABC oscillator (for use in either cyanobacteria AND/OR e. coli)
      • [1] Shows the location of kaiA,BC in WH8102 strain. 2.866kb for kaiABC + non-coding region.
      • Research shows that KaiABC show oscillation independently (Nakajima et al. 2005)
    • Test the oscillator in E. coli to create a "nightlight"
      • Use a luciferase gene reporter, which was done in (Kondo et al. 2000)
      • Also can measure KaiC activity; create a chimeric protein w/GFP
    • Synthesis of ~3kb KaiABC w/ codon replacement of Ala of Leu to use in E. coli
      • Provides backup in case direct movement of KaiABC into E. coli fails
      • Codon replacement problem addressed in (link)
    • Alternate phrasing, courtesy of Kit Parker - what is the "deliverable?" The thing you will point to and say "this is our project?"
      • Our deliverable is a (multiple?) BioBrick part(s)
  • What are two or three possible means of implementing the idea?
  • Risk
    • How many untested things have to work for the project to succeed?
    • How will you test whether those things work or not?
    • How will you adjust your plan when one of these things fails to work?
    • How will you minimize the time/effort/resources lost to a failed design?
      • Can your time/effort/resources apply to more than one design simultaneously?
  • Reward
    • How cool, fun, exciting is the project for you?
    • What if any is the usefulness or societal benefit of the project?
    • What is going to impress the judges in November?
  • Timeline
    • What are the project milestones? (design, construction, testing)
    • What is the estimated time required for each? (always overestimate)
    • If you can't reach your ultimate goal by August, is there a satisfying intermediate goal?
    • What is the immediate next step in pursuing the project?
      • If DNA synthesis will be required, how soon will you have the sequence designed?

  • Nakajima et. al: in vitro, the proteins oscillate abeit not with as large of an amplitude