IGEM:Harvard/2006/DNA nanostructures/Notebook/2006-8-14

From OpenWetWare

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Microcon w/ detergent)
(2. Folding Rxns)
Line 52: Line 52:
| 6a,b||16 {{ul}} 1.5 {{um}}||9 {{ul}}||4 {{ul}} 300 mM {{mgcl2}}||11 {{ul}}
| 6a,b||16 {{ul}} 1.5 {{um}}||9 {{ul}}||4 {{ul}} 300 mM {{mgcl2}}||11 {{ul}}
==Microcon w/ detergent==
==Microcon w/ detergent==

Revision as of 15:19, 15 August 2006


Goals for today

Microcon Purification Tweaking

  • repeat Friday's mega PEG ppt on 5.0 (?)
  • Micron experiments with 0.1% and 0.01% SDS in buffer
    • ...and use 1x folding buffer and not water for washes
    • also: perform control expt with 10 bp+ ladder, since according to Millipore documentation, the filter should retain ds DNAs longer than 100 bp

Streptavidin-Bead "Protection" Assay on Inside- and Outside-Biotinylated c5.0

  • NB: no good purification of nanostructure from oligo has been achieved, but gel separation after elution should differentiate formerly bead-bound oligos from formerly bead-bound nanostructures

Redux of [Mg++], [oligos]

Mg2+, Oligo-Concentration Titration w/ c5.0


  • vary folding conditions ([MgCl2] and [oligo]) in order to determine best folding conditions for c5.0
  • determine most efficient purification protocol (Microcon vs. PEG) based on recovery yields


1. Working Stock Concentration

  • concentrated 6 tubes of 96 μL c5.0D.L (no latches, outside-bound ligand) in Vacufuge so that [oligo]= 250nM * 6 = 1.5 μM

2. Folding Rxns

  • used three different folding buffers varying [MgCl2]
  • used two different [oligo concentrations]: 250 nM from the unconcentrated working stock, 1.5 μM from above
  • folding conditions: 80[[:Category:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] for 2 min., decrease 1[[:Category:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] every 2 min. for 59 more times
Trial Oligos p7308 (44 nM) Folding Buffer (10x) Water
1a,b16 μL 250 nM9 μL4 μL 100 mM MgCl211 μL
2a,b16 μL 1.5 μM9 μL4 μL 100 mM MgCl211 μL
3a,b16 μL 250 nM9 μL4 μL 200 mM MgCl211 μL
4a,b16 μL 1.5 μM9 μL4 μL 200 mM MgCl211 μL
5a,b16 μL 250 nM9 μL4 μL 300 mM MgCl211 μL
6a,b16 μL 1.5 μM9 μL4 μL 300 mM MgCl211 μL

Microcon w/ detergent

  • add 20 μL given nanostructure to center of YM-50 Micrcon tube
  • add 480 μL given folding buffer, microcentrifuge for 6 min. at 14k rcf, and repeat dilution and spinning 4 more times
  • yielded approx. 100 μL retentate, which was concentrated to 15 to 60 μL in a Vacufuge (about 30 min. at 45 [[:Category:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]]), depending on the sample
lane starting amt. of nanostructures wash buffer loaded onto gel
17 μL 1 kb+ ladder
22.25 μL p7308
310 μL unpurified 4.0.I
420 μL 6hb1x folding buffer (10 mM MgCl2)half of retentate
520 μL 6hb1x folding buffer (10 mM MgCl2) w/ 0.1% SDShalf of retentate
620 μL 4.0.I1x folding buffer (10 mM MgCl2)half of retentate
720 μL 4.0.I1x folding buffer (10 mM MgCl2) w/ 0.01% SDShalf of retentate
820 μL 4.0.I1x folding buffer (10 mM MgCl2) w/ 0.1% SDShalf of retentate
  • ran 2% agarose gel at 80 V for 1 h. Gel appears to be of such low qualitiy that the results are inconclusive (ladder isn't clear)
  • ran another 2% agarose gel at 60V for 1 h.
  • results/discussion
    • unclear why 6hb filtration failed (oligos were retained) (lane 4)
    • 0.1% SDS gives unusual/unknown smears (lanes 5 and 8)
      • under visible light, there are thin pink-red bands in the middle of these smears. is SDS breaking down the Microcon tube plastic?
    • 0.01% SDS possibly gives higher yields than no SDS (lane 7 vs. lane 6), but it is not conclusively better yield, and it is still very poor overall yield (lane 7 vs. lane 3)

Streptavidin Bead "Protection"

  • Issues:
    • No protocol found for the Fluka agarose streptavidin beads, and the NEB magnetic bead protocol's heating requirements seem unsuitable for keeping nanoboxes folded throughout the process
      • Nanoboxes must remain folded post-elution because they must be gel-distinguishable from eluted biotinylated oligos, which we have not been able to pre-purify out by other means.
    • Elution methods are of two types:
    • 1. Overload with competitors - either streptavidin or biotinylated oligos
      • But can't: biotin-streptavidin bond is so strong that dissociation by competition would theoretically take years
    • 2. Denature the streptavidin using a) formamide, b) phenol, c) SDS + boiling
      • But can't: all the conditions require heat that might damage the nanostructures (65%degC and up)
  • Solution:
    • Degrade streptavidin with trypsin
      • Trypsin must be in solution w/o EDTA, which would otherwise chelate all the Mg2+ in the DNA nanobox solution that is necessary to keeping it folded.
  • Protocol:
1. Incubate:
     5uL beads (binding capacity: 2pmol/1uL, thus, 10pmol - far greater than the available binding sites in the DNA nanobox solutions)
     35uL 1x folding buffer
     10uL test solution

           TEST SOLUTIONS:
           a) H2O (ie. test = no biotin in solution)
           b) biotinylated oligos (c5.0.8(b)) - 250uM per oligo in pre-working stock = 1mM biotinylation - for 1.6pmol = 1.6uL - thus, 1.6uL + 8.4uL H2O must be added for test solution
           c) c5.0 E(b) (outside biotinylation) (was Microcon "purified" Tu 8.9) - ~2000fmol of binding sites/12.5uL, or 0.16pmol/ul - thus, 1.6pmol 
           d) c5.0 F(b) (inside biotinylation) (was Microcon "purified" Tu 8.9) - "

2. Vortex
3. Pellet by drawing magnet down to bottom of tube.
4. Discard supernatant
5. Add 100uL 1x folding buffer

6. Repeat steps 2-5 three more times.

7. Trypsinize by adding to pellet:
      3uL trypsin (1mg/mL)
      27uL 1x folding buffer
8. Incubate 4hr-overnight @ 37 degrees C

9. Pellet by drawing magnet down to bottom of tube and remove supernatant to clean tube.
10. Run 20uL of each supernatant on 2% agarose gel (10mM MgCl2) for 1hr at 80V.
Personal tools