IGEM:IMPERIAL/2006/ProjectCalendar/2006-9-4: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 62: Line 62:


==Doc & Presentation==
==Doc & Presentation==
*Is the wiki up to date according to the work done during the last two weeks ? <font color=periwinkle> Apart from the lab notebook, which is fairly up to date, not a lot has been added to the wiki in the last two weeks</font>
*Is the wiki up to date according to the work done during the last two weeks ? <font color=periwinkle> Apart from the lab notebook and some things on the biosensor, which are fairly up to date, not a lot has been added to the wiki in the last two weeks</font>
*Have we started to work on the presentation of the project for the Jamboree ? <font color=periwinkle> No, we will probably leave that until we have finished with all the lab-work </font>
*Have we started to work on the presentation of the project for the Jamboree ? <font color=periwinkle> No, we will probably leave that until we have finished with all the lab-work </font>
*Other issues on documentation ?<font color=periwinkle> Just that some serious restructuring and sorting out will be needed at some stage</font>
*Other issues on documentation ?<font color=periwinkle> Just that some serious restructuring and sorting out will be needed at some stage</font>

Revision as of 06:17, 4 September 2006



Progress Report

Assemly

  • Define the status of each test construct (under construction, sequenced, validated, faulty, ready for testing, tested, characterized) -multiple choice possible-
    • Prey cell(J37015): sequenced, ready for testing (has been tested before, testing needs to be reapeated)
    • Prey cell with riboswitch(J37015RS): sequenced, ready for testing (has been tested before, testing needs to be reapeated
    • Prey cell with Cre: Under construction - at PCR stage still
    • Predator sensing part (monocistronic)(J37020): tested - results are on the results page (BUT: the part does not seem to work)
    • Predator sensing part (polycistronic)(J37016): tested - very good results! (see results page)
    • aiiA test construct(J37022): under construction (ligation failed, should be repeated today)
    • Full Predator construct(J37036):was ligated yesterday - to be validated by miniprep tomorrow
    • Data from testing has to be documented & interpreted; all raw data & a normalized graph itself is on the results page


  • others ???
  • What is the current priority in terms of assembly process ? Why ?
  • Other issues ?

Testing

  • Define the status of each testing protocol (to be written, to be validated, validated, data collected, data analysed, faulty protocol) -multiple choices possible-
    • Prey cell:
    • Prey cell with riboswitch:
    • Prey cell with Cre:
    • Predator sensing part (mono):
    • Predator sensing part (poly):
    • aiiA test construct:
    • Full system:
  • aiiA from MIT:
  • What lead us to think that the MIT aiiA part is faulty ?
  • Have we tried to be in touch with other iGEM teams using it ?
  • We have received a new aiiA gene. Can we test it before trying to insert it into our construct ?
  • Chemostat
    • What is the medium to be used in the chemostat ? At which OD do you plan to operate ?
    • Which parts do we plan to test in Chemostat ? Protocols ? Do we know how to get the parameters of the part from the experiment ?
    • Have we done the growth curves of the parts we want to test in the chemostat ?
    • Do we have a final strategy to monitor the ratio between our two populations ?
    • Do we understand how the chemostat environment is going to modify our modelling approach ?
  • Biosensor
    • What is the name of the enzyme we are using ? reference ? see link in Testing Protocol (there are 2 protocols - one for calibration, the other one to check activity of enzyme)
    • Have you already done some testing ? Is there a protocol ? see Testing Protocol (protocol has to be updated). First test was done on Thursday last week, however due to limit in AHL solution being available, the results of the testing might not be accurate
  • How promising is it ? Future work ? After more AHL has arrived, a further test will be carried out and then a better judgement can be made.
  • Data from fluorescence reading has to be interpreted but will probably not give reliable results since T9002 assay itself does not give expected results


  • Other issues on testing ?

Modelling

  • What is the status on the theoretical study of the system ?
  • Do we have simulations using realistic values ?
  • How likely our final construct is to work according to simulations ?
  • Other issues on modelling ?

Doc & Presentation

  • Is the wiki up to date according to the work done during the last two weeks ? Apart from the lab notebook and some things on the biosensor, which are fairly up to date, not a lot has been added to the wiki in the last two weeks
  • Have we started to work on the presentation of the project for the Jamboree ? No, we will probably leave that until we have finished with all the lab-work
  • Other issues on documentation ? Just that some serious restructuring and sorting out will be needed at some stage