IGEM:IMPERIAL/2006/project/parts/Tell us how your part is amazing

From OpenWetWare
Revision as of 01:32, 19 July 2006 by Vincent Rouilly (talk | contribs) (→‎VALIDATION / TESTING)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.


Tell us how your part is amazing.


  1. Create a new wiki page: IGEM:IMPERIAL/2006/project/parts/<name_of_your_part>
  2. Copy and document all the different sections found below


SPECIFICATIONS

  • describe the motivations behind the creation of your part.
  • tell us which parameters or properties of the system you intend to explore.

DESIGN

  • insert an image of your designed part made of biobricks.
  • insert a link to its location into the iGEM registry.
  • define the inputs and outputs of the part.
  • comment on the choices made to fullfill the specifications.

MODELLING

  • insert an image of the model you propose for your part
  • define inputs and outputs.
  • list all the variables and parameters of the model in a table, specifying if their values are known, unknown, to be measured.
  • comment on the sensitivity of key parameters.
  • comment on the different assumptions you have made when modelling.
  • do you think Vincent will be happy with how simple and clear your model is ?

IMPLEMENTATION

  • insert an image of the construct with all the subparts available from the registry.
  • if the part does not exist, describe the assembly process needed out of the available biobricks.
  • estimate how long it could take to build.

VALIDATION / TESTING

  • describe the motivations of the testing in relation with the specifications.
  • insert your proposed wetlab protocol and list in a table the material needed.
  • insert expected experimental results generated by your model.
  • describe how the experimental results will allow you to extract realistic values for your model.
  • how many parameters of your model do you still have to borrow from the literature ?
  • comment on potential issues