IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007/Calendar/2007-7-30: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 109: | Line 109: | ||
*The constructs to be pursued further were discussed. | *The constructs to be pursued further were discussed. | ||
*Relevant protocols to be developed per device. | *Relevant protocols to be developed per device. | ||
====In-Veso==== | |||
* Email Christina from the "Vesicles" Division concerning considerations/issues/problems raised including: | |||
*#Stability/Rigidity of vesicles | |||
*#No. of ribosomes possibly accommodated by vesicles - in other words, size considerations. | |||
*#Polymerase restrictions - only T7 employable? | |||
*#Methods of fabrication | |||
*#Materials employed - particular w.r.t. phospholipid compostion/mixture used. | |||
*#Storage of vesicles, especially at temperatures of 4 degrees Celsius. | |||
*#Communication methods across membrane. | |||
*#Alternative means of forming pores within membrane, since a-hemolysin toxin is not permitted during our project work. | |||
*Also, included in this email, should be the relevant research papers on which our methods/project work to date has been based. |
Revision as of 08:35, 31 July 2007
We are in Week 4 of the iGEM project.
<calendar>
name=IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007/Calendar
date = 2007/08/01
view=threemonths
format=%name/%year-%month-%day
weekstart=7
</calendar>
Proposals
Task List
Students
Supervisors
Today's Schedule
Name | Alex | Anthony | Ben | Cheuk | Dirk | James | Jerry | Lucas | Maira | Peixuan |
0900 | ||||||||||
0930 | ||||||||||
1000 | ||||||||||
1030 | ||||||||||
1100 | ||||||||||
1130 | ||||||||||
1200 | ||||||||||
1230 | ||||||||||
1300 | ||||||||||
1330 | ||||||||||
1400 | ||||||||||
1430 | ||||||||||
1500 | ||||||||||
1530 | ||||||||||
1600 | ||||||||||
1630 | ||||||||||
1700 | ||||||||||
1730 | ||||||||||
1800 | ||||||||||
Evening |
Questions
Debriefing
The debrief session was attended by Professor Freemont. A number of issues were raised; these are described below.
Projects
The work done of the various projects was reported at the debriefing session.
Biofilm
- General protocols available for E Coli experimentation were recorded.
- Work was started on protocols specific to the Biofilm project
- It was reported that 4 constructs would be employed. Also, it was suggested, that due to some parallels with last year's Imperial project, these established constructs could already be exploited.
- More work needs to be done in terms of reporter mechanisms, e.g. DSRed.
- This project proceeds by employing "test" constructs until the required HRP constructs are made available.
Problems/considerations
- Can E Coli Polymerase be employed in the in-vitro/in-veso system, or is T7 the only possibility?
- DSRed, was suggested as a possible reporter system; especially since this would already be characterized from one of the other projects. Are there other reasons which could/could not warrant its use in the Biofilm project? - especially, consider time-scale of operation.
HRP
- The constructs to be pursued further were discussed.
- Relevant protocols to be developed per device.
In-Veso
- Email Christina from the "Vesicles" Division concerning considerations/issues/problems raised including:
- Stability/Rigidity of vesicles
- No. of ribosomes possibly accommodated by vesicles - in other words, size considerations.
- Polymerase restrictions - only T7 employable?
- Methods of fabrication
- Materials employed - particular w.r.t. phospholipid compostion/mixture used.
- Storage of vesicles, especially at temperatures of 4 degrees Celsius.
- Communication methods across membrane.
- Alternative means of forming pores within membrane, since a-hemolysin toxin is not permitted during our project work.
- Also, included in this email, should be the relevant research papers on which our methods/project work to date has been based.