IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007/Projects/Experimental Design/Notes: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 45: Line 45:
#1 pmid=16578817
#1 pmid=16578817
#2 pmid=6330051
#2 pmid=6330051
#3 pmid=3539017
</biblio>
</biblio>



Revision as of 17:04, 21 August 2007



Purification of LuxR

Reagents and Equipment needed

  • An over producing vector in LuxR
    • pHK724?
  • R buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.8 at

5°C/200 mM NaCl/0.1 mM EDTA/0.1 mM dithiothreitol/5% glycerol)

  • o.24mlx 50mM EDTA in 10% X-100
  • 6M Guanidine Hydrochloride
  • Fresh solution of lysozyme
  • Dialysis tube
  • Polyacrylamide electrophoresis


Protocol

The principle of the experiment is to over express Lux R and isolate this from the E.coli Cells. When LuxR is over expressed in E.coli it forms inclusion bodies, which are aggregates of insoluble misfolded proteins. Our aim is to isolate the LuxR inclusion bodies, and to re-solubalise the inclusion body and then to cause the refolding of the LuxR, to end up with highly concentrated and active sample of LuxR.

  1. Cells are grown and induced to produce LuxR. These cells are then isolated from the media by centrifugation to give a cell pellet weight of 0.6g.
  2. The supernatant is carefully removed and discarded to leave the pellet. We then resuspended the pellet in 2.4ml R buffer.
  3. Then add the following to the supernatant: 0.24ml of 50mM EDTA in 10% X-100 and a fresh solution of lysozyme (to give a final concentration of 150jg/ml). This solution should be incubated for 45 mins. The lysozymes will cause lysis of the Cells and the X-100 is to solubalise the membrane proteins, which would otherwise form inclusion bodies.
  4. After incubation the sample should be sonicated and centrifuged at 100,000 x g for 30 min. This second sonication step is to lyse any unlysed cell.
  5. From the sample the supernatant is again carefully removed and discarded, leaving just the pellet. This pellet is composed of insoluble proteins from the cell
  6. The pellet should then be suspended in 2.4 ml R buffer containing 6 M guanidine hydrochloride. This solution should then be incubated for 20 min. This solution of 6 M guanidine hydrochloride will cause certain proteins such as LuxR to become soluble.
  7. After incubation remove the supernatant and place in a new tube. The supernatant should then be centrifuged for 30 min at 100,000 x g.
  8. The supernatant is again removed into a new tube, this supernatant contains the soluble luxR proteins.
  9. The supernatant needs to then be diluted back to 1M guanidine hydrochloride by dropwise addition of RS buffer. By slowly neutralizing the guanidine hydrochloride the LuxR is brought out of solubility and refolds back into a functional protein.
  10. Finally the dilution of LuxR sample in 1M guanidine hydrochloride is dialyzed first against RS buffer containing 0.5M guanidine hydrochloride and then dialyzed against an RS buffer containing 0.25M guanidine hydrochloride
  11. To check for purity of LuxR a SDS-Polyacrylamide gel should be run out. We should see a strong band at 27kDa

References

http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=299138&blobtype=pdf

  1. Kaplan HB and Greenberg EP. Overproduction and purification of the luxR gene product: Transcriptional activator of the Vibrio fischeri luminescence system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Oct;84(19):6639-43. DOI:10.1073/pnas.84.19.6639 | PubMed ID:16578817 | HubMed [1]
  2. Bruist MF and Simon MI. Phase variation and the Hin protein: in vivo activity measurements, protein overproduction, and purification. J Bacteriol. 1984 Jul;159(1):71-9. DOI:10.1128/jb.159.1.71-79.1984 | PubMed ID:6330051 | HubMed [2]
  3. Georgiou G, Telford JN, Shuler ML, and Wilson DB. Localization of inclusion bodies in Escherichia coli overproducing beta-lactamase or alkaline phosphatase. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 Nov;52(5):1157-61. DOI:10.1128/aem.52.5.1157-1161.1986 | PubMed ID:3539017 | HubMed [3]

All Medline abstracts: PubMed | HubMed




Comparison of Batch mode and Plate mode

Batch Mode Plates
Pros Minimises evaporation Less samples used
No temperature fluctuations No pipetting involved from stock solution
Cons A lot of cell extract is needed Problem with evaporation
Home-made cell extracts (by virtue of its large quantity) must be used Fluctuation of temperature
Home made cell extracts might not be reliable Only 50µL is used per well, and this amount is less than the optimum amount for measurement by the fluorometer


Evaporation Problem: With volumes of 0.5 ~1.0 or less and incubation times longer than 30 minutes, each sample is covered with a 3 to 5 mm column of redistilled hexane. link The amount of samples we are looking at is about 100µl, so evaporation would not be a problem.