IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007/Projects/Experimental Design/Phase1: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 275: Line 275:


<div style="float:right; font-size: 150%;"><span class="_toggler_show-toggle2-2 _toggler-toggler2-2a _toggler-toggler2-2b toggler2-2a">Show All Details</span><span class="_toggler_hide-toggle2-2 _toggler-toggler2-2a _toggler-toggler2-2b toggler2-2b" style="display:none;">Hide All Details</span></div>
<div style="float:right; font-size: 150%;"><span class="_toggler_show-toggle2-2 _toggler-toggler2-2a _toggler-toggler2-2b toggler2-2a">Show All Details</span><span class="_toggler_hide-toggle2-2 _toggler-toggler2-2a _toggler-toggler2-2b toggler2-2b" style="display:none;">Hide All Details</span></div>
<br>


=='''3.1 Investigate optimum counting time for fluorodetector'''==


===3.1 Investigate optimum counting time for fluorodetector===
<br clear="all">
<br clear="all">
<div style="position: relative; top: 5px;">
<div style="position: relative; top: 5px;">
Line 290: Line 291:


<br>
<br>
A test to see what is the optimum counting time to have during our experiments. The counting time is the time the fluorometer detector stays on top of each well. A small window time will only account for very discrete levels of fluorescence. These might include sudden spikes of radiation since fluorescence is not a uniform process. Hence we will get variation between samples of equal expression rates. A larger counting time results in a larger window size and hence a more average reading is taken from each sample smoothing out the variation due to the randomness of fluorescence emition.  
A test to see what is the optimum counting time to have during our experiments. The counting time is the time the fluorometer detector stays on top of each well. A small window time will only account for very discrete levels of fluorescence. These might include sudden spikes of radiation since fluorescence is not a uniform process. Hence we will get variation between samples of equal expression rates. A larger counting time results in a larger window size and hence a more average reading is taken from each sample smoothing out the variation due to the randomness of fluorescence emition. <br>
Care must be taken however because larger counting times will lead to faster fluorescence bleaching. A comprimise between the two must be found.


{| border="0" align="right" style="font-style:Bold; font-size:140%; color:red;"
{| border="0" align="right" style="font-style:Bold; font-size:140%; color:red;"
| align="left" width="170px" |  
| align="left" width="170px" |  
| align="right"  style="font-style:Bold; font-size:110%;" | [[IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007/Experimental Design/Phase1/Protocol 2.2 |'''Protocol''']]  
| align="right"  style="font-style:Bold; font-size:110%;" | [[IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007/Experimental Design/Phase1/Protocol 3.1 |'''Protocol''']]  
|-
|-
| colspan=2 align="right"  style="font-style:Bold; font-size:110%;" | [[IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007/Experimental Design/Phase1/Results 2.2 |'''Results''']]  
| colspan=2 align="right"  style="font-style:Bold; font-size:110%;" | [[IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007/Experimental Design/Phase1/Results 3.1 |'''Results''']]  
|}</div>
|}</div>


<br>
<br>
'''Aims:'''<br>
'''Aims:'''<br>
''Experiment 1 :''
Determine the optimum counting time for the fluorometer.
*Determine the DNA concentration and purity. From this determine volume of the DNA needed to add to the in vitro expression systems.
Avoid fluorescence bleaching.
''Experiment 2:''
*To determine if the infector detecter construct expresses ''in vitro''
*To Test the construct in home made and in commercial e.coli cell extract
<br>
<br>
'''Status:'''<br>


<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<span class="_toggler_toggle-item2-2-1">'''[+] Constant Conditions'''</span>
<span class="_toggler_toggle-item3-1-1">'''[+] Constant Conditions'''</span>
<div class="toggle2-2 item2-2-1" style="display:none;">
<div class="toggle3-1 item3-1-1" style="display:none;">
*37 <sup>o</sup>C
*Temperature: 25 <sup>o</sup>C (Room temperature)
*DNA added 2μg
*200 µl aliquots from pTet culture in each well
</div>
</div>


<span class="_toggler_toggle-item2-2-2">'''[+] Variables'''</span>
<span class="_toggler_toggle-item3-1-2">'''[+] Variables'''</span>
<div class="toggle2-2 item2-2-2" style="display:none;">
<div class="toggle3-1 item3-1-2" style="display:none;">
*Type of cell extract used : Commercial and home made cell extract 
*Vary the counting time of the fluorometer from 0.15 sec to 0.9 sec.
*AHL concentration added: 1uM
*The counting times tested will be : 0.15, 0.30, 0.45, 0.60, 0.75, 0.90 sec
</div>
</div>


<span class="_toggler_toggle-item2-2-3">'''[+] Sampling'''</span>
<span class="_toggler_toggle-item3-1-3">'''[+] Sampling'''</span>
<div class="toggle2-2 item2-2-3" style="display:none;">
<div class="toggle3-1 item3-1-3" style="display:none;">
*Every 30 minutes initially and there after adjust sampling accordingly.
*Take readings every 5 minutes for 1 hour.
Repetition:
Repetition:
*3 repeats
*4 repeats
</div>
</div>


<span class="_toggler_toggle-item2-2-4">'''[+] Controls'''</span>
<span class="_toggler_toggle-item3-1-4">'''[+] Controls'''</span>
<div class="toggle2-2 item2-2-4" style="display:none;">  
<div class="toggle3-1 item3-1-4" style="display:none;">  
*Negative Control: In vitro system with no AHL added
*Negative Control: E.Coli cultures without GFP expressing machinery
*Positive Control: In vitro system with purified GFP added
*Positive Control: Diluted GFP in well
</div>
</div>


<div style="float:right; font-size: 150%;"><span class="_toggler_show-toggle2-2 _toggler-toggler2-2a _toggler-toggler2-2b toggler2-2a">Show All Details</span><span class="_toggler_hide-toggle2-2 _toggler-toggler2-2a _toggler-toggler2-2b toggler2-2b" style="display:none;">Hide All Details</span></div>
<div style="float:right; font-size: 150%;"><span class="_toggler_show-toggle3-1 _toggler-toggler3-1a _toggler-toggler3-1b toggler3-1a">Show All Details</span><span class="_toggler_hide-toggle3-1 _toggler-toggler3-1a _toggler-toggler3-1b toggler3-1b" style="display:none;">Hide All Details</span></div>

Revision as of 17:56, 20 August 2007



1. Initial Promoter Testing - IN VIVO


1.1 Initial testing for Cell by Date

Overall Status
Results uploaded !
Construct Status
pTet-GFP Tested - 16/08/2007
pT7-GFP Tested - 17/08/2007
pCI-GFP Waiting for construct


Constructs: pTet-GFP (BBa_I13522), pT7-GFP (BBa_E7104) , pcI-GFP (BBa_I719022)


Test to see if construct will express in vivo. Experiments carried out at 30°C in an incubator.


Aims:

  • To determine if construct expresses in vivo


Protocol
Results


[+] Constant Conditions

[+] Variables

[+] Sampling

[+] Controls

Show All Details






1.2 Initial testing for Infector Detector


Status
Planned for 22/8/07 INCOMPLETE


Construct: pTet - LuxR - pLux - GFP (BBa_T9002)

Test to see if construct will express in vivo. Experiments carried out in incubator at 30oC at a range of inducer concentrations. To do this, we induce E. coli cells transfected with the construct with known concentrations of AHL. We then record the change in GFP, such that we can calculate the rate of GFP production relative to concentration of AHL in solution.

Protocol
Results


Aims:

  • To determine if construct expresses GFP in vivo


[+] Constant Conditions

[+] Variables

[+] Sampling

[+] Controls

Show All Details

2. Initial Promoter Testing - IN VITRO


2.1 Initial Testing for Cell by Date

Overall Status
Construct Status
pTet-GFP Initial Testing - 21/08/2007
pT7-GFP Initial Testing - 21/08/2007
pCI-GFP Waiting for construct




Constructs: pTet-GFP (BBa_I13522), pT7-GFP (BBa_E7104) , pcI-GFP (BBa_I719022)


Aims:
Experiment 1 :

  • Determine the DNA concentration and purity. From this determine volume of the DNA needed to add to the in vitro expression systems.
Protocol
Results

Experiment 2:

  • To determine which constructs for cell by date expresses in vitro
  • To test the pTet and pcI constructs in commercial S30 E.coli cell extract and home made S30 extract
  • To test the pT7 construct in commercial S30 T7 cell extract and home made S30 extract.
  • To investigate optimum volume of home made S30 extract
  • To investigate the differences between home made and commercially bought S30 extract. This is in terms of rates of expression, length of expression and total output.

Status:

  • Home made extract on hold until next week, this is because of problem that there was no amino acid or tRNA supplements added. We are carrying on with the commercial extracts for our testing
  • DNA Constructs: Purified samples of pTet+pT7 available Friday, pcI available next week.
  • T7 Commercial extract arrived
  • E.coli commercial extract to arrive Friday


[+] Constant Conditions

[+] Variables

[+] Sampling

[+] Controls

Show All Details






2.2 Initial testing for Infector Detector


Status
Initial Testing - 21/08/2007 INCOMPLETE


Construct: pTet - LuxR - pLux - GFP (BBa_T9002)


Test to see if construct will express in vitro. Experiments carried out at incubator at 37oC and under an inducer concentration that was shown to give a high induction in vivo.

Protocol
Results


Aims:
Experiment 1 :

  • Determine the DNA concentration and purity. From this determine volume of the DNA needed to add to the in vitro expression systems.

Experiment 2:

  • To determine if the infector detecter construct expresses in vitro
  • To Test the construct in home made and in commercial e.coli cell extract


Status:



[+] Constant Conditions

[+] Variables

[+] Sampling

[+] Controls

Show All Details


3.1 Investigate optimum counting time for fluorodetector


Status
Planned for 21/08/2007 INCOMPLETE


Construct: pTet-GFP (BBa_I13522)


A test to see what is the optimum counting time to have during our experiments. The counting time is the time the fluorometer detector stays on top of each well. A small window time will only account for very discrete levels of fluorescence. These might include sudden spikes of radiation since fluorescence is not a uniform process. Hence we will get variation between samples of equal expression rates. A larger counting time results in a larger window size and hence a more average reading is taken from each sample smoothing out the variation due to the randomness of fluorescence emition.
Care must be taken however because larger counting times will lead to faster fluorescence bleaching. A comprimise between the two must be found.

Protocol
Results


Aims:
Determine the optimum counting time for the fluorometer. Avoid fluorescence bleaching.



[+] Constant Conditions

[+] Variables

[+] Sampling

[+] Controls

Show All Details