IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007/Projects/Hrp System: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(45 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
=Hrp Characterisation=
=Hrp Characterisation: Introduction=
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__


<div class="tabs-blue">
<div class="tabs-blue">
<ul>
<ul>
<li id="current">[[IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007/Projects/Hrp System|Specifications]]</li>
<li id="current">[[IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007/Projects/Hrp System|Introduction]]</li>
<li>[[IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007/Projects/Hrp System/Design|Design]]</li>
<li>[[IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007/Projects/Hrp System/Specifications|Specifications]]</li>
<li>[[IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007/Projects/Hrp System/Modelling|Modelling]]</li>
<li>[[IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007/Projects/Hrp System/Parts|Parts]]</li>
<li>[[IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007/Projects/Hrp System/Implementation|Implementation]]</li>
<li>[[IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007/Projects/Hrp System/Devices|Devices]]</li>
<li>[[IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007/Projects/Hrp System/TestingValidation|Testing/Validation]]</li>
<li>[[IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007/Projects/Hrp System/Testing|Testing]]</li>
<li>[[IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007/Projects/Hrp System/Application|Application]]</li>
<li>[[IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007/Projects/Hrp System/Notes|Notes]]</li>
<li>[[IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007/Projects/Hrp System/Notes|Notes]]</li>
<li>[[IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007/Projects/Hrp System/References|References]]</li>
<li>[[IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007/Projects/Hrp System/References|References]]</li>
Line 17: Line 18:
__TOC__
__TOC__


== Characterisation Tasks ==
The Aim of this project is to contribute new characterised parts to the biobricks registry. The parts we plan to contribute are from the Hrp system. The Hrp system is composed of a promoter under the control of two positive regulating proteins and one negative regulating protein. The Hrp system can be manipulated in a number of ways to give various devices:
*Find literature and protocols for each question
* A new regulatory system
*Design experiments for each question
* A two input AND gate
**Note down the time requirements
* A three input AND with one input inverted
*Plan the schedule
Our aim is to carry out a detailed characterisation of the Hrp parts and the various devices. We feel that this is going to be an important contribution to the biobricks registry for the following reasons:
*Look for alternatives to PoPS (RiPs?)
* The Hrp system appears to have very interesting properties, being a highly regulated and responsive system, we feel that it will be a key addition to the registry and future iGEM projects.
*Schedule meeting with instructors
* Our aim is to characterise Hrp thoroughly, we wish to make our parts and devices as generic and easy to use as possible. We feel that thorough characterisation is of great importance to the registry and to synthetic biology.We hope to illustrate this importance and to inspire current and future parts to have this level of characterisation.
We wish to characterise the Hrp system in generic units that allow modular design and experimental reproducibility. This is a key concept in synthetic biology, with the ideal unit being [[IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007/Projects/Hrp System/Notes/PoPS| Polymerase Per Second (PoPS)]], However, we cannot directly measure PoPS and so we haev to measure it indirectly. One approach is to measure rate of protein synthesis and relate this back to PoPS. We propose to measure our device in terms of protein synthesis, particularly '''GFP molecule synthesised cfu<sup>-1</sup> sec<sup>-1</sup>'''.
This measurement we feel is still a valid generic unit:
*It is a reproducible measurement because the unit is independent of the equipment used, such as fluorometers that can vary in calibrations. This independence is because we are measuring in terms of the rate of GFP synthesis as opposed to just fluorescence.
*The unit also allows modular design, this is either when the other parts used have the same units or the rate of GFP synthesis is related to a more generic unit for protein synthesis or to PoPS. We will be measuring the input and output of our Hrp system in terms of GFP synthesis.




 
== The Hrp System ==
=== Techniques for measuring PoPS ===
[[IMAGE:ICGEMS_dvc_HrpR&S+V+L.png‎|thumb|right|230px| The Hrp System]]
 
In Pseudomonas syringae strains, the hrp-hrc pathogenicity island consists of an hrpL-dependent regulon that encodes a type III protein translocation complex and translocated effector proteins required for pathogenesis.
*Link to the techniques used for the [[IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007/Projects/Hrp System/Characterisation_BBa_F2620|characterisation of the BBa_F2620]]
<br>
*There are several screening vectors available that can be used when measuring PoPS. An example are the [[#BBa_13450_to_13458_screening_vectors|BBa_13450 to 13458]]
HrpR and HrpS function as positive regulatory factors of the hrpL promoter, but their mechanism of action has not been established. HrpV is a negative regulatory factor of the hrpL promoter, its action will repress any activation by HrpR and HrpS.
 
<br>
== Characterisation Specification ==
=== Current Knowledge on the HRP system ===
All characterisation will be done in terms of PoPS, initially using indirect measurements relative to GFP/RFP synthesis per CFU per second. If time and resources permit, a more direct method will be used. Some of the characteristics will be gleaned from [[IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007/Projects/Hrp System/References|literature]] in order to reduce the number of required experiments.
*HrpR and HrpS has optimal activation when both are expressed together in an operon. Transcription of this operon in a continuous polycistronic mRNA, that is then translated separately into HrpR and HrpS proteins.
 
*The HrpV repressor protein binds to the HTH motif of HrpS. The HrpV binds to the central region of HrpS, however its mechanism of binding is unknown.
Experiments will attempt to fulfil an [[#Objectives | objective]] within a certain [[#Contexts | context]], and with variation of a single [[#Parameters | parameter]] for the listed [[#Parts and Devices | components]]. Since there are several objectives, contexts, and parameters, the number of data points to be obtained is very large. Therefore, priorities were established for each list in order to aid scheduling of experiments.
*The DNA sequence within the HrpL promoter that HrpR and HrpS bind is unknown. What is known is that it is located somewhere upstream of the +1 position. Tests have shown that it must be within a 150bp range from the +1 site of transcription.
 
*The Hrp System when in Pseudomonas has an optimum temperature of 28 <sup>o</sup>C.  
=== Parts and Devices ===
*Three other chassie considerations is that Lon proteins have been shown to degrade HrpR, sigma 54 is required and Integration Host Factor is required.
This is a prioritised list of parts and devices using the Hrp system that we would like to characterise.
*HrpR and HrpS will can induce the promoter independent of each other. However, this is only about 2.5% activation compared to when both are present.
#[[image:ICGEMS_dvc_HrpR&S+L.png|left|thumb|350px|Follower: pHrpL promoter - RS (single operon) only]]<br clear="all">
*Repression by HrpV reduces the original activity of the HrpL promoter to 5-10%. For full repression of the activity, it has been shown that large amounts of HrpV should be expressed before expressing HrpR and HrpS.
#[[image:ICGEMS_dvc_HrpR&S+V+L.png|left|thumb|350px|AND with one inversion: pHrpL promoter - RS and V]]<br clear="all">
#[[image:ICGEMS_dvc_AND_R&S.png|thumb|left|350px|AND Gate: pHrpL promoter - R and S (separate operons) only]]<br clear="all">
#[[image:ICGEM_dvc_PulseGen.png‎|thumb|left|230px|Pulse generator (RS -> pHrpL expressing HrpV)]]<br clear="all">
#[[image:ICGEMS_dvc_3-AND_R&S&V.png‎|thumb|left|350px|3-port AND with one inversion: pHrpL promoter - R and S and V]]<br clear="all">
#[[image:ICGEMS_dvc_HrpL+HrpBOX.png|left|thumb|350px|HrpBOX and &sigma;<sub>L</sub> (HrpL)]]<br clear="all">
#[[image:ICGEMS_sys_Hrp.png|left|thumb|400px|The full HRP system]]<br clear="all">
 
=== Objectives ===
This is a prioritised list of experimental objectives - the quantities we are trying to find:
# Strength of response (ratio of PoPS out to PoPS in)
# Minimum/maximum PoPS output and input
# Signal fluctuation and noise (base level of PoPS out)
# Leakiness
# Response time
# Half-life of proteins (stability)
#* Recovery of response
# Input ratio effects on output
#* How R and S affect activity separately
#* Having both R and S under same promoter
# Interaction with other parts
# Energy requirements
# Enhancer length effects
 
===Contexts===
This is a prioritised list of the experimental contexts that we would like to perform characterisation in.  
# E.Coli K12 strain - [http://parts.mit.edu/registry/index.php/Part:BBa_V1002 BBa_V1002]
# In Vitro
# E.Coli K12 strain - [http://parts.mit.edu/registry/index.php/Part:BBa_V1002 BBa_V1002]
#*With the following parts from the registry: (Note, check that the last four items are useful)
## The [http://parts.mit.edu/registry/index.php/Part:BBa_F2620 F2620 Promoter]
## Plasmid [http://parts.mit.edu/registry/index.php/Part:pSB1A3 pSB1A3]
## Plasmid [http://parts.mit.edu/registry/index.php/Part:pSB3K3 pSB3K3]
## [http://parts.mit.edu/registry/index.php/Part:BBa_E0430 BBa_E0430]
## [http://parts.mit.edu/registry/index.php/Part:BBa_E0434 BBa_E0434]
## [http://parts.mit.edu/registry/index.php/Part:BBa_E0240 BBa_E0240]
## [http://parts.mit.edu/registry/index.php/Part:BBa_C0040 BBa_C0040]
# E.Coli DH5a strain - [http://parts.mit.edu/registry/index.php/Part:BBa_V1001 BBa_V1001]
# E.Coli MG1655 strain - [http://parts.mit.edu/registry/index.php/Part:BBa_V1000 BBa_V1000]
 
=== Parameters ===
# [[#Promoters | Promoters]]
# Ribosome Binding Sites
# Temperature
# Medium
# pH
# PspF (alter the expression of PspF - this is a source of noise)
# LoN protease (LoN is known to break down HrpR)
# Other &sigma;<sub>54</sub> regulators

Latest revision as of 02:37, 3 August 2007

Hrp Characterisation: Introduction


The Aim of this project is to contribute new characterised parts to the biobricks registry. The parts we plan to contribute are from the Hrp system. The Hrp system is composed of a promoter under the control of two positive regulating proteins and one negative regulating protein. The Hrp system can be manipulated in a number of ways to give various devices:

  • A new regulatory system
  • A two input AND gate
  • A three input AND with one input inverted

Our aim is to carry out a detailed characterisation of the Hrp parts and the various devices. We feel that this is going to be an important contribution to the biobricks registry for the following reasons:

  • The Hrp system appears to have very interesting properties, being a highly regulated and responsive system, we feel that it will be a key addition to the registry and future iGEM projects.
  • Our aim is to characterise Hrp thoroughly, we wish to make our parts and devices as generic and easy to use as possible. We feel that thorough characterisation is of great importance to the registry and to synthetic biology.We hope to illustrate this importance and to inspire current and future parts to have this level of characterisation.

We wish to characterise the Hrp system in generic units that allow modular design and experimental reproducibility. This is a key concept in synthetic biology, with the ideal unit being Polymerase Per Second (PoPS), However, we cannot directly measure PoPS and so we haev to measure it indirectly. One approach is to measure rate of protein synthesis and relate this back to PoPS. We propose to measure our device in terms of protein synthesis, particularly GFP molecule synthesised cfu-1 sec-1. This measurement we feel is still a valid generic unit:

  • It is a reproducible measurement because the unit is independent of the equipment used, such as fluorometers that can vary in calibrations. This independence is because we are measuring in terms of the rate of GFP synthesis as opposed to just fluorescence.
  • The unit also allows modular design, this is either when the other parts used have the same units or the rate of GFP synthesis is related to a more generic unit for protein synthesis or to PoPS. We will be measuring the input and output of our Hrp system in terms of GFP synthesis.


The Hrp System

The Hrp System

In Pseudomonas syringae strains, the hrp-hrc pathogenicity island consists of an hrpL-dependent regulon that encodes a type III protein translocation complex and translocated effector proteins required for pathogenesis.
HrpR and HrpS function as positive regulatory factors of the hrpL promoter, but their mechanism of action has not been established. HrpV is a negative regulatory factor of the hrpL promoter, its action will repress any activation by HrpR and HrpS.

Current Knowledge on the HRP system

  • HrpR and HrpS has optimal activation when both are expressed together in an operon. Transcription of this operon in a continuous polycistronic mRNA, that is then translated separately into HrpR and HrpS proteins.
  • The HrpV repressor protein binds to the HTH motif of HrpS. The HrpV binds to the central region of HrpS, however its mechanism of binding is unknown.
  • The DNA sequence within the HrpL promoter that HrpR and HrpS bind is unknown. What is known is that it is located somewhere upstream of the +1 position. Tests have shown that it must be within a 150bp range from the +1 site of transcription.
  • The Hrp System when in Pseudomonas has an optimum temperature of 28 oC.
  • Three other chassie considerations is that Lon proteins have been shown to degrade HrpR, sigma 54 is required and Integration Host Factor is required.
  • HrpR and HrpS will can induce the promoter independent of each other. However, this is only about 2.5% activation compared to when both are present.
  • Repression by HrpV reduces the original activity of the HrpL promoter to 5-10%. For full repression of the activity, it has been shown that large amounts of HrpV should be expressed before expressing HrpR and HrpS.