IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007/Projects/Reporters: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
 
(22 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Useful Reporters==
= Analysis of Reporters in Application Design =
I have classified reporters into three main classes for the sake of simplicity.
 
 
==Introduction==
Reporters genes are primarily used in molecular biological research for monitoring gene expression, as well as protein localization studies. While the ultimate goal of the molecular biologist is to elucidate intracellular events, this is not always the case for synthetic biology. This analysis of the common reporters available to molecular biology is an attempt to re-think the way we define a reporter's feasibility in accordance to its physical characteristics, and perhaps find the most suitable reporter gene for our applications.
 
== Fluorescent Reporters ==
 
=== GFP (Green Fluorescent Protein) ===
* Gene name: ''gfp''
* Organism: ''Aequorea victoria'', ''Aequorea coerulescens''
* Gene sequence: 5170 bp, [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/viewer.fcgi?db=nuccore&id=155662 GenBank]
* Availability in Registry: [http://parts.mit.edu/registry/index.php/Part:BBa_E0040 BBa_E0040] as GFP mut3b (derived from wt GFP)
 
'''Characteristics'''<br>
{| style="background:#F5FAFF; border: 1px solid #aabadd; color:Black"
|- style="background:#a4d4b0; color:Black" align="center"
| style="background:#a4d4b0" | '''GFP Variants'''
|| '''Sequence Comparison''' || '''Spectral Properties''' || '''Physical Properties''' || '''Detection Time''' || '''Maturation Time''' || '''Relative Fluorescent Intensity''' || '''Degradation (Half-Life)'''
|- style="background:#d5e9d7"
| style="background:#a4d4b0" | ''wt GFP''
|| N/A ||
*Excitation Max: 395 (470)nm
* Emission Max: 509 (540)nm
* Extinct Coeff.: 9,500
* Quantum Yield: 0.80
<cite>GFP</cite>
|| 
* ''pH Sensitivity'': 5.5-12, decreases btw. 5.5-4, drops sharply > 12.<cite>GFP</cite>
* ''Thermostability'': 70&deg;C for matured proteins with possibility of re-naturation; assumed for all GFP variants.<cite>GFP</cite>
* ''Temp Sensitivity'': Variable across different organisms.
** For ''E. coli'', increased gene expression at 24&deg;C and 30&deg;C compared to 37&deg;C. <cite>GFP</cite>
** For yeast, strongest gene expression at 15&deg;C, decreasing to 25% at 37&deg;C. <cite>GFP</cite>
** For mammalian cells, stronger fluorescence at 30-33&deg;C than 37&deg;C. <cite>GFP</cite>
* ''Protein Solubility'': Much is insoluble form; forms inclusion bodies.<cite>Andersen</cite>
* ''Redox Stability'': Requires O<sub>s</sub> for oxidized state; assumed for all GFP variants.<cite>GFP</cite>
|| ~1-2 h <cite>Andersen</cite> || 24 h <cite>GFP</cite> || 1-fold <cite>Andersen</cite> <br /> 1-fold excited under UV <cite>Andersen</cite> || 24 h ''in vivo'' <cite>GFP</cite>
|- style="background:#d5e9d7"
| style="background:#a4d4b0" | ''GFP mut3b''
|| S2R, S65G, S72A <br /> Optimized for bacteria <cite>Andersen</cite>||
* Excitation Max: 501nm
* Emission Max: 511nm <cite>Andersen</cite>
|| 
* ''pH Sensitivity'': Not determined <br />
* ''Protein Solubility'': Virtually all in soluble form.<cite>Andersen</cite>
|| ~8 min <cite>Andersen</cite> || ?? || 21-fold <cite>Andersen</cite> <br /> 0.2-fold excited under UV <cite>Andersen</cite> || Est. > 24 h ''in vivo'' <cite>Valdivia</cite>
|- style="background:#d5e9d7"
| style="background:#a4d4b0" | ''EGFP (GFP mut1)''
|| F64L, S65T <br /> Optimized for mammalian cells <cite>Andersen</cite>||
* Excitation Max: 484nm
* Emission Max: 510nm
* Extinct Coeff.: 23,000
* Quantum Yield: 0.70
<cite>GFP</cite>
|| 
* ''pH Sensitivity'': 7-11.5, decreases btw. 7-4.5, drops sharply > 11.5 <cite>GFP</cite>
* ''Temp Sensitivity'': Little difference in fluorescence at 25&deg;C or 37&deg;C. <cite>GFP</cite>
* ''Protein Solubility'': 90% in soluble form; forms inclusion bodies<cite>Andersen</cite>
|| ~8 min <cite>Andersen</cite> || 8-12 h <cite>AcGFP1</cite> || 35-fold <cite>Andersen</cite> <br /> 0.8-fold excited under UV <cite>Andersen</cite> || Est. > 24 h ''in vivo''<cite>Valdivia</cite>
|- style="background:#d5e9d7"
| style="background:#a4d4b0" | ''AcGFP1''
|| 94% a/a homology <br /> Optimized for mammalian cells <cite>AcGFP1</cite> ||
* Excitation Max: 475nm
* Emission Max: 505nm
* Extinct Coeff.: 32,500
*  Quantum Yield: 0.82 <cite>AcGFP1</cite>
|| 
* ''pH Sensitivity'': Not determined <br />
* ''Protein Solubility'': True green monomer; presumed soluble <cite>AcGFP1</cite> <br />
|| ?? || 8-12 h <cite>AcGFP1</cite> || Comparable to EGFP <cite>AcGFP1</cite> || Not determined yet <cite>AcGFP1</cite> ||
|}
<br>
'''Advantages'''<br>
* Major advantages in monitoring gene expression in single cells as compared to luciferase and &beta;-galactosidase, eg. repeated readings under fluorometric assay.
* Fixation and sampling preparation techniques not necessary.
* Well-characterized and readily available in Registry.
 
'''Disadvantages'''<br>
* Nonlinearity of fluorescent signals that can be partially solved with calibration curve.
* Variability in temperature sensitivity. Non-linear dynamics wrt. temperature.
* Signal cannot be amplified in a controlled manner, ie. based on promoter strength.
* Long maturation time.
* Photobleaching.
 
'''Conclusion'''<br>
* Several restrictions observed for the GFP reporter means it is not superior per se to other reporter assays in terms of quantitative measurement of gene expression.
* It is however an excellent candidate as an all-or-none expression assay; except for the requirement of a dark room with UV scanning devices.
 
'''References'''<br>
<biblio>
#Andersen pmid=9603842
#Valdivia pmid=8707053
#AcGFP1 [http://www.clontech.com/images/brochures/AcGFP1.pdf Clontech Living Colours AcGFP1 Fluorescent Protein Flyer]
#GFP [http://www.clontech.com/images/pt/PT2040-1.pdf Clontech Living Colors Protocol and User Manual]
#GFP1 pmid=9335045
 
</biblio>
 
<br clear="all">
 
=== RFP (Red Fluorescent Protein) ===
* Gene name: ''DsRed''
* Organism: ''Discosoma sp.''
* Gene sequence: [http://www.ebi.uniprot.org/entry/Q9U6Y8 SwissProt Q9U6Y8]
* Availability in Registry: [http://parts.mit.edu/registry/index.php/Part:BBa_E1010 BBa_E1010] as mRFP1(True RFP monomer with restriction sites removed)
 
'''Characteristics'''<br>
{| style="background:#F5FAFF; border: 1px solid #aabadd; color:Black"
|- style="background:#a4d4b0; color:Black" align="center"
| style="background:#a4d4b0" | '''DsRed Variants'''
|| '''Sequence Comparison''' || '''Spectral Properties''' || '''Physical Properties''' || '''Detection Half-Time''' || '''Maturation Time''' || '''Relative Fluorescent Intensity''' || '''Degradation (Half-Life)'''
|- style="background:#d5e9d7"
| style="background:#a4d4b0" | ''DsRed1''
|| Identical to wt except *2V insertion after Start codon ||
* Excitation Max: 558 nm
* Emission Max: 583 nm
* Extinct Coeff.: 52,000 M<sup>-1</sup>cm<sup>-1</sup>
* Quantum Yield: 0.68<br />
||
* ''pH Sensitivity'': 5.5-9.5, deviation from either end drastically reduces folding.
* ''Thermostability'': ??
* ''Protein Solubility'': Tetramer, tends to aggregate.
 
|| 11 h || > 24 h || 1-fold || ??
|- style="background:#d5e9d7"
| style="background:#a4d4b0" | ''DsRed2''
|| R2A, K5E, K9T, V105A, I161T, S197A  ||
* Excitation Max: 561 nm
* Emission Max: 587 nm
* Extinct Coeff.: 43,800 M<sup>-1</sup>cm<sup>-1</sup>
* Quantum Yield: 0.55 <br />
||
* ''pH Sensitivity'': Same as DsRed1
* ''Thermostability'': ??
* ''Protein Solubility'': Tetramer, less tendency to aggregate
 
|| 6.5 h || 24 h || 0.68 || Est. longer than EGFP
|- style="background:#d5e9d7"
| style="background:#a4d4b0" | ''DsRed-Express(T4)''
|| R2A, K5E, N6D, T21S, H41T, N42Q, V44A, C117S, T217A ||
* Excitation Max: 555 nm<br />
* Emission Max: 586 nm
* Extinct Coeff.: 30,300 M<sup>-1</sup>cm<sup>-1</sup>
* Quantum Yield: 0.44 <br />
||
* ''pH Sensitivity'': Same as DsRed1
* ''Thermostability'': 20-45&deg;C wrt. fluorescence levels
* ''Protein Solubility'': Tetramer, less tendency to aggregate
 
|| 0.71 h || 8-12 h || 0.38 || Est. 3 weeks in ''Xenopus'' embryos
|- style="background:#d5e9d7"
| style="background:#a4d4b0" | ''DsRed Monomer (mRFP1)''
|| 45 a/a substitutions + A28G, A76G, A349G, G337A to remove restriction sites ||
* Excitation Max:584 nm
* Emission Max: 607 nm
* Extinct Coeff.: 44,000 M<sup>-1</sup>cm<sup>-1</sup>
* Quantum Yield: 0.25 <br />
||
* ''pH Sensitivity'': Same as DsRed1
* ''Thermostability'': ??
* ''Protein Solubility'': Monomer; soluble
|| < 1 h  || ~12 h || ~0.27 (30% less cf. DsRed-Express) || ??
|}
<br>
'''Advantages'''<br>
* More resistant to photobleaching than EGFP (although mRFP1 photobleaches 10x more than its variants and is comparable to EGFP).
* Reasonable detection periods.
* More resistant to degradation.
 
'''Disadvantages'''<br>
* Generally more prone to aggregate due to multimeric structures.
* Slower maturation time compared to GFP.
 
'''Conclusion'''<br>
* Not recommended for fusion tagging, except mRFP1.
* Better indicator for quantitative monitoring of gene expression cf. GFP.
 
'''References'''<br>
<biblio>
# Campbell pmid=12060735
# clontech-red [http://www.clontech.com/images/pt/PT3404-1.pdf Living Colors Volume II: Reef Coral Fluorescent Proteins]
# bevis pmid=11753367
</biblio>
 
<br clear="all">
 
===Yellow Fluorescent Protein===
*Gene name: ''yfp''
*Part: [http://parts.mit.edu/registry/index.php/Part:BBa_E0030 BBa_E0030]
*'''Description''': Fluorescent protein which can be excited under 529 nm, releasing emission at 539 nm that is detected as yellow light.
*Response Time: ~8 hours
*Steady State Time: ???
*Concentration sensitivity: Moderate
*Advantages:
**Gives off a true yellow emission, allows colour variation
*Disadvantages:
**Less intense than other fluorescent molecules
 
<br clear="all">
 
== Bioluminescent Reporters ==


===Bioluminescence===
These reporters code for an enzyme which cleaves an added substrate, giving off light which is observed as luminescence.<br>
These reporters code for an enzyme which cleaves an added substrate, giving off light which is observed as luminescence.<br>
'''''Advantages''''':
'''''Advantages''''':
Line 11: Line 209:
*Usually requires the addition of substrates to be oxidized, which can limit the luminescence signal.
*Usually requires the addition of substrates to be oxidized, which can limit the luminescence signal.


====Firefly luciferase====
===Firefly luciferase===
*Gene name: ''lucff''
*Gene name: ''lucff''
*Gene sequence: 1781 bp, [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/viewer.fcgi?db=nuccore&id=9526 GenBank]
*Gene sequence: 1781 bp, [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/viewer.fcgi?db=nuccore&id=9526 GenBank]
Line 27: Line 225:
**Substrate limiting
**Substrate limiting


====Bacterial luciferase====
===Bacterial luciferase===
*Gene name: ''luxCDABE''
*Gene name: ''luxCDABE''
*'''Description''': 5 subunit protein which oxidizes FMN with the help of oxygen to generate FMN and H<sub>2</sub> complex.  This complex breaks down to form light.
*'''Description''': 5 subunit protein which oxidizes FMN with the help of oxygen to generate FMN and H<sub>2</sub> complex.  This complex breaks down to form light.
Line 44: Line 242:
Questions: What substrate does this need?
Questions: What substrate does this need?


====Renilla luciferase====
===Renilla luciferase===
*Gene name: ''luci''
*Gene name: ''luci''
*Part: [http://parts.mit.edu/registry/index.php/Part:BBa_J52008 BBa_J52008]
*Part: [http://parts.mit.edu/registry/index.php/Part:BBa_J52008 BBa_J52008]
Line 58: Line 256:
**Substrate limiting
**Substrate limiting


===Fluorescence Reporters===
There reporters code for a fluorescent molecule, which has to be activated by light of a certain wavelength, allowing them to emit light of a different wavelength.<br>
'''''Advantages''''':
*They are highly stable, and can be active even in dead cells
*Does not require additional substrates, only excitation of light
*Can be fused with other proteins
'''''Disadvantages''''':
*Slow folding time, resulting in generally slow response
*Can require the use of UV light
====Green Fluorescent Protein====
*Gene name: ''gfp''
*Gene sequence: 5170 bp, [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/viewer.fcgi?db=nuccore&id=155662 GenBank]
*Part: [http://parts.mit.edu/registry/index.php/Part:BBa_E0040 BBa_E0040]
*'''Description''': Fluorescent protein which can be exicited under 493 nm, releasing emission at 505 nm that is detected as a green light.
*Response Time: ~1 hour (maybe longer)
*Steady State Time: 8 hours
*Concentration sensitivity: High
*Advantages
**GFP can be fused with other proteins
**Highly stable, long half-life (days)
*Disadvantages
**Requires UV excitation
**Slow folding


====Red Fluorescent Protein====
*Gene name: ''rfp''
*Part: [http://parts.mit.edu/registry/index.php/Part:BBa_E1010 BBa_E1010]
*'''Description''': Fluorescent protein which can be excited under 563 nm, releasing emission at 582 nm that is detected as a red light.
*Response Time: ~8 hours
*Steady State Time: 12++ hours
*Concentration sensitivity: Moderate (due to long folding hours)
*Advantages:
**Visible under normal light
**Very highly stable, very long half-life (weeks)
*Disadvantages:
**Very slow folding


====Yellow Fluorescent Protein====
*Gene name: ''yfp''
*Part: [http://parts.mit.edu/registry/index.php/Part:BBa_E0030 BBa_E0030]
*'''Description''': Fluorescent protein which can be excited under 529 nm, releasing emission at 539 nm that is detected as yellow light.
*Response Time: ~8 hours
*Steady State Time: ???
*Concentration sensitivity: Moderate
*Advantages:
**Gives off a true yellow emission, allows colour variation
*Disadvantages:
**Less intense than other fluorescent molecules




====Discosoma sp. red fluorescent protein Express====
*Gene name: DsRed-Express/ DSred T4
*Part not found in registry
*Rapidly maturing variant of DsRed
*'''Description''': It contains nine amino acid substitutions, which enhance its solubility, reduce its green emission, and accelerate its maturation. Although DsRed- Express most likely forms the same tetrameric structure as wild-type DsRed, DsRed-Express displays a reduced tendency to aggregate.
*Mamximum Excitation wavelength: 555nm
*Maturation Half time: 0.71 hours
*Steady State: After 7 hours
*pH sensitivity: 5.5 to 9.5 (A pH higher or lower than this drastically reduces the folding efficiency, and thus the fluorescence level.)
*Product [http://www.clontech.com/products/detail.asp?product_id=157258 link]
*Reference: [http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v20/n1/full/nbt0102-83.html Rapidly maturing variants of the Discosoma red fluorescent protein (DsRed)]


===Enzymic Reporters===
===Enzymic Reporters===

Latest revision as of 08:19, 7 September 2007

Analysis of Reporters in Application Design

Introduction

Reporters genes are primarily used in molecular biological research for monitoring gene expression, as well as protein localization studies. While the ultimate goal of the molecular biologist is to elucidate intracellular events, this is not always the case for synthetic biology. This analysis of the common reporters available to molecular biology is an attempt to re-think the way we define a reporter's feasibility in accordance to its physical characteristics, and perhaps find the most suitable reporter gene for our applications.

Fluorescent Reporters

GFP (Green Fluorescent Protein)

  • Gene name: gfp
  • Organism: Aequorea victoria, Aequorea coerulescens
  • Gene sequence: 5170 bp, GenBank
  • Availability in Registry: BBa_E0040 as GFP mut3b (derived from wt GFP)

Characteristics

GFP Variants Sequence Comparison Spectral Properties Physical Properties Detection Time Maturation Time Relative Fluorescent Intensity Degradation (Half-Life)
wt GFP N/A
  • Excitation Max: 395 (470)nm
  • Emission Max: 509 (540)nm
  • Extinct Coeff.: 9,500
  • Quantum Yield: 0.80

[1]

  • pH Sensitivity: 5.5-12, decreases btw. 5.5-4, drops sharply > 12.[1]
  • Thermostability: 70°C for matured proteins with possibility of re-naturation; assumed for all GFP variants.[1]
  • Temp Sensitivity: Variable across different organisms.
    • For E. coli, increased gene expression at 24°C and 30°C compared to 37°C. [1]
    • For yeast, strongest gene expression at 15°C, decreasing to 25% at 37°C. [1]
    • For mammalian cells, stronger fluorescence at 30-33°C than 37°C. [1]
  • Protein Solubility: Much is insoluble form; forms inclusion bodies.[2]
  • Redox Stability: Requires Os for oxidized state; assumed for all GFP variants.[1]
~1-2 h [2] 24 h [1] 1-fold [2]
1-fold excited under UV [2]
24 h in vivo [1]
GFP mut3b S2R, S65G, S72A
Optimized for bacteria [2]
  • Excitation Max: 501nm
  • Emission Max: 511nm [2]
  • pH Sensitivity: Not determined
  • Protein Solubility: Virtually all in soluble form.[2]
~8 min [2] ?? 21-fold [2]
0.2-fold excited under UV [2]
Est. > 24 h in vivo [3]
EGFP (GFP mut1) F64L, S65T
Optimized for mammalian cells [2]
  • Excitation Max: 484nm
  • Emission Max: 510nm
  • Extinct Coeff.: 23,000
  • Quantum Yield: 0.70

[1]

  • pH Sensitivity: 7-11.5, decreases btw. 7-4.5, drops sharply > 11.5 [1]
  • Temp Sensitivity: Little difference in fluorescence at 25°C or 37°C. [1]
  • Protein Solubility: 90% in soluble form; forms inclusion bodies[2]
~8 min [2] 8-12 h [4] 35-fold [2]
0.8-fold excited under UV [2]
Est. > 24 h in vivo[3]
AcGFP1 94% a/a homology
Optimized for mammalian cells [4]
  • Excitation Max: 475nm
  • Emission Max: 505nm
  • Extinct Coeff.: 32,500
  • Quantum Yield: 0.82 [4]
  • pH Sensitivity: Not determined
  • Protein Solubility: True green monomer; presumed soluble [4]
?? 8-12 h [4] Comparable to EGFP [4] Not determined yet [4]


Advantages

  • Major advantages in monitoring gene expression in single cells as compared to luciferase and β-galactosidase, eg. repeated readings under fluorometric assay.
  • Fixation and sampling preparation techniques not necessary.
  • Well-characterized and readily available in Registry.

Disadvantages

  • Nonlinearity of fluorescent signals that can be partially solved with calibration curve.
  • Variability in temperature sensitivity. Non-linear dynamics wrt. temperature.
  • Signal cannot be amplified in a controlled manner, ie. based on promoter strength.
  • Long maturation time.
  • Photobleaching.

Conclusion

  • Several restrictions observed for the GFP reporter means it is not superior per se to other reporter assays in terms of quantitative measurement of gene expression.
  • It is however an excellent candidate as an all-or-none expression assay; except for the requirement of a dark room with UV scanning devices.

References

  1. [GFP]
  2. Andersen JB, Sternberg C, Poulsen LK, Bjorn SP, Givskov M, and Molin S. New unstable variants of green fluorescent protein for studies of transient gene expression in bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998 Jun;64(6):2240-6. DOI:10.1128/AEM.64.6.2240-2246.1998 | PubMed ID:9603842 | HubMed [Andersen]
  3. Cormack BP, Valdivia RH, and Falkow S. FACS-optimized mutants of the green fluorescent protein (GFP). Gene. 1996;173(1 Spec No):33-8. DOI:10.1016/0378-1119(95)00685-0 | PubMed ID:8707053 | HubMed [Valdivia]
  4. [AcGFP1]
  5. Misteli T and Spector DL. Applications of the green fluorescent protein in cell biology and biotechnology. Nat Biotechnol. 1997 Oct;15(10):961-4. DOI:10.1038/nbt1097-961 | PubMed ID:9335045 | HubMed [GFP1]

All Medline abstracts: PubMed | HubMed


RFP (Red Fluorescent Protein)

  • Gene name: DsRed
  • Organism: Discosoma sp.
  • Gene sequence: SwissProt Q9U6Y8
  • Availability in Registry: BBa_E1010 as mRFP1(True RFP monomer with restriction sites removed)

Characteristics

DsRed Variants Sequence Comparison Spectral Properties Physical Properties Detection Half-Time Maturation Time Relative Fluorescent Intensity Degradation (Half-Life)
DsRed1 Identical to wt except *2V insertion after Start codon
  • Excitation Max: 558 nm
  • Emission Max: 583 nm
  • Extinct Coeff.: 52,000 M-1cm-1
  • Quantum Yield: 0.68
  • pH Sensitivity: 5.5-9.5, deviation from either end drastically reduces folding.
  • Thermostability: ??
  • Protein Solubility: Tetramer, tends to aggregate.
11 h > 24 h 1-fold ??
DsRed2 R2A, K5E, K9T, V105A, I161T, S197A
  • Excitation Max: 561 nm
  • Emission Max: 587 nm
  • Extinct Coeff.: 43,800 M-1cm-1
  • Quantum Yield: 0.55
  • pH Sensitivity: Same as DsRed1
  • Thermostability: ??
  • Protein Solubility: Tetramer, less tendency to aggregate
6.5 h 24 h 0.68 Est. longer than EGFP
DsRed-Express(T4) R2A, K5E, N6D, T21S, H41T, N42Q, V44A, C117S, T217A
  • Excitation Max: 555 nm
  • Emission Max: 586 nm
  • Extinct Coeff.: 30,300 M-1cm-1
  • Quantum Yield: 0.44
  • pH Sensitivity: Same as DsRed1
  • Thermostability: 20-45°C wrt. fluorescence levels
  • Protein Solubility: Tetramer, less tendency to aggregate
0.71 h 8-12 h 0.38 Est. 3 weeks in Xenopus embryos
DsRed Monomer (mRFP1) 45 a/a substitutions + A28G, A76G, A349G, G337A to remove restriction sites
  • Excitation Max:584 nm
  • Emission Max: 607 nm
  • Extinct Coeff.: 44,000 M-1cm-1
  • Quantum Yield: 0.25
  • pH Sensitivity: Same as DsRed1
  • Thermostability: ??
  • Protein Solubility: Monomer; soluble
< 1 h ~12 h ~0.27 (30% less cf. DsRed-Express) ??


Advantages

  • More resistant to photobleaching than EGFP (although mRFP1 photobleaches 10x more than its variants and is comparable to EGFP).
  • Reasonable detection periods.
  • More resistant to degradation.

Disadvantages

  • Generally more prone to aggregate due to multimeric structures.
  • Slower maturation time compared to GFP.

Conclusion

  • Not recommended for fusion tagging, except mRFP1.
  • Better indicator for quantitative monitoring of gene expression cf. GFP.

References

  1. Campbell RE, Tour O, Palmer AE, Steinbach PA, Baird GS, Zacharias DA, and Tsien RY. A monomeric red fluorescent protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jun 11;99(12):7877-82. DOI:10.1073/pnas.082243699 | PubMed ID:12060735 | HubMed [Campbell]
  2. [clontech-red]
  3. Bevis BJ and Glick BS. Rapidly maturing variants of the Discosoma red fluorescent protein (DsRed). Nat Biotechnol. 2002 Jan;20(1):83-7. DOI:10.1038/nbt0102-83 | PubMed ID:11753367 | HubMed [bevis]

All Medline abstracts: PubMed | HubMed


Yellow Fluorescent Protein

  • Gene name: yfp
  • Part: BBa_E0030
  • Description: Fluorescent protein which can be excited under 529 nm, releasing emission at 539 nm that is detected as yellow light.
  • Response Time: ~8 hours
  • Steady State Time: ???
  • Concentration sensitivity: Moderate
  • Advantages:
    • Gives off a true yellow emission, allows colour variation
  • Disadvantages:
    • Less intense than other fluorescent molecules


Bioluminescent Reporters

These reporters code for an enzyme which cleaves an added substrate, giving off light which is observed as luminescence.
Advantages:

  • More sensitive than other spectroscopy reporters, since there is often neglectable background bioluminescence (not naturally found in cells).
  • Relatively fast response

Disadvantages:

  • Generally metabolically stressing, since key metabolic compounds are required in the generation of light.
  • Usually requires the addition of substrates to be oxidized, which can limit the luminescence signal.

Firefly luciferase

  • Gene name: lucff
  • Gene sequence: 1781 bp, GenBank
  • Description: Oxidizes luciferin with the help of oxygen, releases light as a product of oxidation.
  • Enzyme: EC 1.13.12.7
  • Reaction: Photinus luciferin + O2 + ATP <=> oxidized Photinus luciferin + CO2 + AMP + diphosphate + light
  • Response Time: ~30 minutes
  • Steady State Time: 4 hours
  • Concentration sensitivity: Moderate
  • Advantages:
    • Fast response
    • Can be initiated by addition of luciferin
  • Disadvantages:
    • Metabolic stress, ATP is consumed
    • Substrate limiting

Bacterial luciferase

  • Gene name: luxCDABE
  • Description: 5 subunit protein which oxidizes FMN with the help of oxygen to generate FMN and H2 complex. This complex breaks down to form light.
  • Enzyme: EC 1.14.14.3
  • Reaction: RCHO + reduced FMN + O2 <=> RCOOH + FMN + H2O + light
  • Response Time: ~30 minutes
  • Steady State Time: 8 hours
  • Concentration sensitivity: Moderate
  • Advantages:
    • Fast response
    • Can be initiated by addition of substrate
  • Disadvantages:
    • Five subunits required
    • Metabolic stress, FMN is consumed
    • Substrate limiting

Questions: What substrate does this need?

Renilla luciferase

  • Gene name: luci
  • Part: BBa_J52008
  • Description: Requires renilla luciferin, which is oxidized by oxygen to genrate light. The only luciferase part in the registry.
  • Enzyme: EC 1.13.12.5
  • Reaction: Renilla luciferin + O2 <=> oxidized Renilla luciferin + CO2 + light
  • Response Time: ???
  • Steady State Time: ???
  • Concentration sensitivity: Moderate
  • Advantages:
    • Yields higher signal than firefly luciferase
  • Disadvantages:
    • Substrate limiting




Enzymic Reporters

These reporters code for a specific enzyme, which can metabolize an added substrate to give a chromophore.
Advantages:

  • Usually colourmetric and visible under light
  • Generally fast expression times
  • Assay after expression allows for much higher concentration sensitivity

Disadvantages:

  • Requires the addition of extra substrates
  • Enzyme concentration is generally assayed after expression (sample is taken from cell culture and assayed)
  • Enzymes are generally already found in many strains of E. coli

Alkaline Phosphatase

  • Gene name: ppb
  • Part: BBa_J61032
  • Description: Enzyme which functions optimally in alkaline environments (periplasm), breaks down para-nitrophenol phosphate to form compound which absorbs at 405 nm. Sometimes known as SEAP (secreted akaline phosphatase).
  • Enzyme: EC 3.1.3.1
  • Reaction: Phosphate monoester + H2O <=> an alcohol + phosphate
  • Response Time: ??? (possibly within minutes)
  • Steady State Time: ???
  • Concentration sensitivity: High
  • Advantages:
    • High concentration sensitivity
  • Disadvantages:
    • Enzymatic reaction is slow

β-D-Galactosidase

  • Gene name: lacZ
  • Part: BBa_E0033 Note: This part is special and works only when both fragments of lacZ are present.
  • Description: β-galactosidase cleaves a synthetic lactose homologue, o-nitrophenyl-β-D-galactoside (ONPG) to give a yellow compound, o-nitrophenol, which has a peak absorbance at 420 nm. Using Miller's equation, the amount of β-galactosidase can be determined.
    Alternatively, 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl- beta-D-galactopyranoside (X-gal) or variants (such as S-gal) can be also be cleaved into a coloured compound absorbing at 420 nm.
  • Enzyme: EC 3.2.1.23
  • Reaction: o-nitrophenyl-β-D-galactoside + H2O <=> galactose + o-nitrophenol
  • Response Time: Within minutes
  • Steady State Time: 2-3 hours
  • Concentration sensitivity: Very high (with Miller)
  • Advantages:
    • Visible under white light, good for selection purposes
    • Very high concentration sensitivity
    • Enzyme reaction can be stopped during assay
  • Disadvantages:
    • Must use lacZ- strain of E. coli to prevent cross-talking
    • Requires cells to be killed to release enzymes for Miller's assay

β-D-Glucuronidase

  • Gene name: gus
  • Description: Acts similarly to β-galactosidase, can hydrolyze 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl glucuronide (X-Gluc) into a coloured compound, which absorbs at ??? nm. Alternatively, 4-Methylumbelliferyl-β-D-glucuronide (MUG) can be hydrolyzed into a fluorescent compound, which absorbs at 390 nm and emits at 480 nm.
  • Enzyme: EC 3.2.1.31
  • Reaction: A beta-D-glucuronoside + H2O <=> D-glucuronate + an alcohol
  • Response Time: ??? (possibly within minutes)
  • Steady State Time: ???
  • Concentration sensitivity: ???
  • Advantages:
    • Visible under white light
  • Disadvantages:
    • β-glucuronidase naturally in E. coli might interfere with expression of recombinant gene

Other Possible Reporters

  • Chloramphenicol Acetyltransferase (CAT)
  • Human Growth Hormone (hGH)

Detecting Reporters

  • Spectrometric Assays
  • Enzyme Activity Assays
  • Immunology Assays