IGEM:IMPERIAL/2008/Sequence: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:
*<font color=green>Just had a thought, can we reuse lacI from the registry, ill check operon binding sites but if its a hybrid i guess its the same</font>
*<font color=green>Just had a thought, can we reuse lacI from the registry, ill check operon binding sites but if its a hybrid i guess its the same</font>


*<font color=cyan> Ok, the LacI gene i sunder control of the Phyper-spank promoter, it's just downstream of it, that's pretty neat thinking about it.... We could bung the whole section (EcoRI to BamHI in, and plug our bit in the middle somehow maybe?)</font>
*<font color=cyan> Ok, the LacI gene i sunder control of the Phyper-spank promoter, it's just downstream of it, that's pretty neat thinking about it.... We could bung the whole section (''EcoRI'' to ''BamHI'' in, and plug our bit in the middle somehow maybe?)</font>


{| border="1" cellpadding="2" style="text-align:left"
{| border="1" cellpadding="2" style="text-align:left"

Revision as of 18:01, 29 July 2008

Hello Team Sequence, Thought we could use this page to load up all the information. If we could load up the sequence of the parts here, probably load the pure sequence then one with the restriction sites on the end. Here are some useful websites about the ends:

First thing tomorrow we need to get a group together (preferably with Kirsten) and decide about whether to use stand-alone RBSs or use Promoter-RBS or RBS-gene combinations

  • Chris D Hirst 23:44, 29 July 2008 (UTC):Ok, it seems a lot of the work I did before leaving the office hasn't been registered. The changes I make now better be there tomorrow or I'm gonna be really hacked off
  • Chris D Hirst 00:17, 30 July 2008 (UTC):Woah, waht the deuce is going on with this page? Was it just me or did it just get rolled back 10 mins?
  • James- Man i hate the wiki, whats going on? man sequence checking sucks so bad
  • Chris - I hear you on that one, thinking it sucks worse checking one you've made yourself though, spotted a gem of a mistake I'd missed earlier. The comC sequence in the .doc file was for the wrong strand....
  • Just had a thought, can we reuse lacI from the registry, ill check operon binding sites but if its a hybrid i guess its the same
  • Ok, the LacI gene i sunder control of the Phyper-spank promoter, it's just downstream of it, that's pretty neat thinking about it.... We could bung the whole section (EcoRI to BamHI in, and plug our bit in the middle somehow maybe?)
Part Class Part Name Sequence File Papers/References Checked Biobrick Length (bp)
Promoter
1.Promoter - Light Pctc Pctc
Biobrick
Paper DBTBS J,QQ 99bp
2.Promoter - σB PgsiB PgsiB
Biobrick
Paper DBTBS J, C 81bp
3.Promoter - ComK upregulated PcomC PcomC
Biobrick
DBTBS The files for this promoter have been re-uploaded, hope they remain this time... C 137bp
4.Promoter - Constitutuive P43 P43
Biobrick
Paper
Paper2
C,J 99bp
5.Promoter - Inducible Phyper-spank Ph-s
Biobrick
Dr. Angelika Grundling (Imperial College London), Dr. Jan-Willem Veening (Newcastle University), Paper1, Paper2, Paper3, NEBcutter2 C,J ust had a thought, can we reuse lacI from the registry, ill check operon binding sites but if its a hybrid i guess its the same 145bp
6.Promoter - Inducible Pxyl Pxyl
Biobrick
Dr. Jan-Willem Veening (Newcastle University), DBTBS, Paper1, Paper2 C, J Had a look on DBTBS and papers and the regulatory region that XylR is downstream of the start codon and I guess we would need to add these binding sequences to the genes we want to express damn, missed that one, well spotted, I'll update it tomorrow 83-87bp
7.Promoter - Contitutive (high) Pveg Pveg
Biobrick
Dr. Jan-Willem Veening (Newcastle University), DBTBS C - checked NCBI, sequences do match, image as such included in the new Pveg file, J 87
RBS
1.RBS - Stong RBS-gsiB RBS-gsiB
Biobrick
Paper DBTBS C 54bp (343bp with promoter)
2.RBS - Strong RBS-spoVG RBS-spoVG
Biobrick
Paper (reference only) DBTBS C 68bp
3.RBS - Strong RBS-PBS RBS-PBS
Biobrick
Dr. Jan-Willem Veening (Newcastle University), Paper Issues - C
Gene
1.Gene epsE Protein
Biobrick
Page 9, Online Supplementary Material for "A Molecular Clutch Disables Flagella in the Bacillus subtilis Biofilm" QQ, J 878
2.Gene ytvA Protein
Biobrick
Partial sequence (LOV domain) QQ, J 786
3.Gene sinR Protein
Biobrick
- QQ, J 377
4.Biomaterial EP24-20-20 Biobrick Paper QQ, J 640
5.Biomaterial EAK16-II Biobrick Paper QQ, J 92
6.Signal Peptide SacB Biobrick Paper QQ, J Unsure how the length of the sequence was decided? 139
7.Signal Peptide LipA Biobrick Paper QQ 145
8.Signal Peptide Epr Biobrick Paper QQ 133
Terminator
1.Terminator TermI-VI
Consensus of 6 terminators
6NSCT Protein
Biobrick
Search for additional replication terminators in the Bacillus subtilis chromosome 30bp
2.Terminator rrnO rrnO Biobrick Dr. Jan-Willem Veening (Newcastle University) 133bp (with extra frame-shift base)
3.Terminator rrnA rrnA Biobrick Dr. Jan-Willem Veening (Newcastle University) 132bp (with extra frame-shift base)