IGEM:IMPERIAL/2008/Sequence: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
*<font color=green>Just had a thought, can we reuse lacI from the registry, ill check operon binding sites but if its a hybrid i guess its the same</font> | *<font color=green>Just had a thought, can we reuse lacI from the registry, ill check operon binding sites but if its a hybrid i guess its the same</font> | ||
*<font color=cyan> Ok, the LacI gene i sunder control of the Phyper-spank promoter, it's just downstream of it, that's pretty neat thinking about it.... We could bung the whole section (EcoRI to BamHI in, and plug our bit in the middle somehow maybe?)</font> | *<font color=cyan> Ok, the LacI gene i sunder control of the Phyper-spank promoter, it's just downstream of it, that's pretty neat thinking about it.... We could bung the whole section (''EcoRI'' to ''BamHI'' in, and plug our bit in the middle somehow maybe?)</font> | ||
{| border="1" cellpadding="2" style="text-align:left" | {| border="1" cellpadding="2" style="text-align:left" |
Revision as of 18:01, 29 July 2008
Hello Team Sequence, Thought we could use this page to load up all the information. If we could load up the sequence of the parts here, probably load the pure sequence then one with the restriction sites on the end. Here are some useful websites about the ends:
- http://partsregistry.org/Help:BioBrick_Prefix_and_Suffix
- http://partsregistry.org/Assembly:RBS-CDS_issues
First thing tomorrow we need to get a group together (preferably with Kirsten) and decide about whether to use stand-alone RBSs or use Promoter-RBS or RBS-gene combinations
- Chris D Hirst 23:44, 29 July 2008 (UTC):Ok, it seems a lot of the work I did before leaving the office hasn't been registered. The changes I make now better be there tomorrow or I'm gonna be really hacked off
- Chris D Hirst 00:17, 30 July 2008 (UTC):Woah, waht the deuce is going on with this page? Was it just me or did it just get rolled back 10 mins?
- James- Man i hate the wiki, whats going on? man sequence checking sucks so bad
- Chris - I hear you on that one, thinking it sucks worse checking one you've made yourself though, spotted a gem of a mistake I'd missed earlier. The comC sequence in the .doc file was for the wrong strand....
- Just had a thought, can we reuse lacI from the registry, ill check operon binding sites but if its a hybrid i guess its the same
- Ok, the LacI gene i sunder control of the Phyper-spank promoter, it's just downstream of it, that's pretty neat thinking about it.... We could bung the whole section (EcoRI to BamHI in, and plug our bit in the middle somehow maybe?)
Part Class | Part Name | Sequence File | Papers/References | Checked | Biobrick Length (bp) |
Promoter | |||||
1.Promoter - Light | Pctc | Pctc Biobrick |
Paper DBTBS | J,QQ | 99bp |
2.Promoter - σB | PgsiB | PgsiB Biobrick |
Paper DBTBS | J, C | 81bp |
3.Promoter - ComK upregulated | PcomC | PcomC Biobrick |
DBTBS | The files for this promoter have been re-uploaded, hope they remain this time... C | 137bp |
4.Promoter - Constitutuive | P43 | P43 Biobrick |
Paper Paper2 |
C,J | 99bp |
5.Promoter - Inducible | Phyper-spank | Ph-s Biobrick |
Dr. Angelika Grundling (Imperial College London), Dr. Jan-Willem Veening (Newcastle University), Paper1, Paper2, Paper3, NEBcutter2 | C,J ust had a thought, can we reuse lacI from the registry, ill check operon binding sites but if its a hybrid i guess its the same | 145bp |
6.Promoter - Inducible | Pxyl | Pxyl Biobrick |
Dr. Jan-Willem Veening (Newcastle University), DBTBS, Paper1, Paper2 | C, J Had a look on DBTBS and papers and the regulatory region that XylR is downstream of the start codon and I guess we would need to add these binding sequences to the genes we want to express damn, missed that one, well spotted, I'll update it tomorrow | 83-87bp |
7.Promoter - Contitutive (high) | Pveg | Pveg Biobrick |
Dr. Jan-Willem Veening (Newcastle University), DBTBS | C - checked NCBI, sequences do match, image as such included in the new Pveg file, J | 87 |
RBS | |||||
1.RBS - Stong | RBS-gsiB | RBS-gsiB Biobrick |
Paper DBTBS | C | 54bp (343bp with promoter) |
2.RBS - Strong | RBS-spoVG | RBS-spoVG Biobrick |
Paper (reference only) DBTBS | C | 68bp |
3.RBS - Strong | RBS-PBS | RBS-PBS Biobrick |
Dr. Jan-Willem Veening (Newcastle University), Paper | Issues - C | |
Gene | |||||
1.Gene | epsE | Protein Biobrick |
Page 9, Online Supplementary Material for "A Molecular Clutch Disables Flagella in the Bacillus subtilis Biofilm" | QQ, J | 878 |
2.Gene | ytvA | Protein Biobrick |
Partial sequence (LOV domain) | QQ, J | 786 |
3.Gene | sinR | Protein Biobrick |
- | QQ, J | 377 |
4.Biomaterial | EP24-20-20 | Biobrick | Paper | QQ, J | 640 |
5.Biomaterial | EAK16-II | Biobrick | Paper | QQ, J | 92 |
6.Signal Peptide | SacB | Biobrick | Paper | QQ, J Unsure how the length of the sequence was decided? | 139 |
7.Signal Peptide | LipA | Biobrick | Paper | 145 | |
8.Signal Peptide | Epr | Biobrick | Paper | 133 | |
Terminator | |||||
1.Terminator | TermI-VI Consensus of 6 terminators |
6NSCT Protein Biobrick |
Search for additional replication terminators in the Bacillus subtilis chromosome | 30bp | |
2.Terminator | rrnO | rrnO Biobrick | Dr. Jan-Willem Veening (Newcastle University) | 133bp (with extra frame-shift base) | |
3.Terminator | rrnA | rrnA Biobrick | Dr. Jan-Willem Veening (Newcastle University) | 132bp (with extra frame-shift base) |