IGEM:IMPERIAL/Methodology: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
<div class="tabs-blue">
<ul>
<li id="current">[[IGEM:IMPERIAL/Methodology|Overview]]</li>
<li>[[IGEM:IMPERIAL/Methodology/Specifications|Specifications]]</li>
<li>[[IGEM:IMPERIAL/Methodology/Design|Design]]</li>
<li>[[IGEM:IMPERIAL/Methodology/Modelling|Modelling]]</li>
<li>[[IGEM:IMPERIAL/Methodology/Implementation|Implementation]]</li>
<li>[[IGEM:IMPERIAL/Methodology/TestingValidation|Testing/Validation]]</li>
</ul>
</div>
<br style="clear:both">
==From a brilliant idea to a glowing bacteria==


==From a brilliant idea to a glowing bacteria==


{| style="width:90%; height:80px" border="0" align="right"
{| style="width:90%; height:80px" border="0" align="right"

Revision as of 07:10, 16 September 2006


From a brilliant idea to a glowing bacteria

  • This section intends to illustrate the framework used by the Imperial College iGEM Team in 2006. Over the summer 2006, for our first participation to iGEM, we wanted to explore how far we could push the traditional engineering approach in order to deal with a Synthetic Biology project.
  • Without constraining the student to a particular system, we wanted them to follow an engineering development cycle. As it is true for traditional engineering project management, it was thought to promote collaborative work, traceability and quality control throughout the all project.
  • The engineering development cycle was based on 5 steps : Specifications, Design, Modelling, Implementation and Testing/Validation