IGEM:IMPERIAL/Methodology: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
<div class="tabs-blue"> | |||
<ul> | |||
<li id="current">[[IGEM:IMPERIAL/Methodology|Overview]]</li> | |||
<li>[[IGEM:IMPERIAL/Methodology/Specifications|Specifications]]</li> | |||
<li>[[IGEM:IMPERIAL/Methodology/Design|Design]]</li> | |||
<li>[[IGEM:IMPERIAL/Methodology/Modelling|Modelling]]</li> | |||
<li>[[IGEM:IMPERIAL/Methodology/Implementation|Implementation]]</li> | |||
<li>[[IGEM:IMPERIAL/Methodology/TestingValidation|Testing/Validation]]</li> | |||
</ul> | |||
</div> | |||
<br style="clear:both"> | |||
==Imperial College first steps in iGEM== | |||
{| style="width:90%; height:80px" border="0" align="right" | {| style="width:90%; height:80px" border="0" align="right" | ||
| Line 7: | Line 18: | ||
*This section intends to illustrate the framework used by the Imperial College iGEM Team in 2006. Over the summer 2006, for our first participation to iGEM, we wanted to explore how far we could push the '''traditional engineering approach''' in order to deal with a '''Synthetic Biology project'''. | *This section intends to illustrate the framework used by the Imperial College iGEM Team in 2006. Over the summer 2006, for our first participation to iGEM, we wanted to explore how far we could push the '''traditional engineering approach''' in order to deal with a '''Synthetic Biology project'''. | ||
*Without constraining the | *Without constraining the students to a particular system, we wanted them to follow an engineering development cycle. As it is true for traditional engineering project management, it was thought to promote '''collaborative work''', '''traceability''' and '''quality control''' throughout the all project. | ||
*The engineering development cycle was based on 5 steps : '''Specifications''', '''Design''', '''Modelling''', '''Implementation''' and '''Testing/Validation''' | *The engineering development cycle was based on 5 steps : '''Specifications''', '''Design''', '''Modelling''', '''Implementation''' and '''Testing/Validation''' | ||
| Line 13: | Line 24: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|colspan="2"| | |colspan="2"| | ||
*In the following sections we will discuss the different steps of the methodology, illustrating them with documents produced by the students. We will also point out some tools that we used to accomplish each task. Finally, we will give | *In the following sections we will discuss the different steps of the methodology, illustrating them with documents produced by the students. We will also point out some tools that we used to accomplish each task. Finally, we will give [[IGEM:IMPERIAL/2006/Instructors_Feedbacks | feedbacks from our first experience]]. | ||
|} | |} | ||
Latest revision as of 07:30, 6 October 2006
Imperial College first steps in iGEM
|
 |
| |
