IGEM:Imperial/2007/Wet Lab/results/Res1.4: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
To construct a degradation curve of GFPmut3b in the in vitro chassis. This will verify whether the degradation of the system would be a limiting factor to the expression of the system.  
To construct a degradation curve of GFPmut3b in the in vitro chassis. This will verify whether the degradation of the system would be a limiting factor to the expression of the system.  


==Materials and methods==
Link to the [http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/Imperial/Wet_Lab/Protocols/Prot1.4 Protocol]
Link to the [http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/Imperial/Wet_Lab/Protocols/Prot1.4 Protocol]


==Results==
==Results==


[[Image:IC 2007 Degradation.PNG|left|thumb|500px|Figure 1.1 ]]
[[Image:IC 2007 Degradation.PNG|left|thumb|500px|Figure 1.1 Fluorescence vs time]]
 
[[Image:IC 2007 Degradation log.png|right|thumb|500px|Figure 1.2 Semi-log plot of fluorescence vs time]]
<br clear="all">


==Conclusion==
The degradation constant was calculated from the semi-log plot. The average gradients of all the semi-log plots was -0.0003501. This is equivalent to a decay-constant of 0.0003501. Using the equation ln2/k = t<sub>1/2</sub>, the half-life of GFP was calculated to 1980 minutes, or approximately 33 hours. This agrees with the literature value of ~24 hours. So for our experimental timescale of 6 hours, we would only observe 12% of our GFP to be degraded. This supports our assumption that the degradation of GFP is very small within the timescale of our experiments.


'''Raw Data'''
'''Raw Data'''
*[[Mdia.xls| Raw Data excel file ]]
*[[Media:IC 2007 Degradation curve 25oC 04-10.xls| Raw Data excel file ]]

Latest revision as of 08:19, 24 October 2007

Degradation Curve: Fluroescence of GFPmut3b as a function of time

Aims

To construct a degradation curve of GFPmut3b in the in vitro chassis. This will verify whether the degradation of the system would be a limiting factor to the expression of the system.

Materials and methods

Link to the Protocol

Results

Figure 1.1 Fluorescence vs time
Figure 1.2 Semi-log plot of fluorescence vs time


Conclusion

The degradation constant was calculated from the semi-log plot. The average gradients of all the semi-log plots was -0.0003501. This is equivalent to a decay-constant of 0.0003501. Using the equation ln2/k = t1/2, the half-life of GFP was calculated to 1980 minutes, or approximately 33 hours. This agrees with the literature value of ~24 hours. So for our experimental timescale of 6 hours, we would only observe 12% of our GFP to be degraded. This supports our assumption that the degradation of GFP is very small within the timescale of our experiments.

Raw Data