IGEM:Imperial/2010/Modelling: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
(SimulLink)
(Amplification modelling attempt 1)
Line 3: Line 3:


Example on how Valencia 2006 team used SimulLink to simulate their project: [http://www.igem.upv.es/igem06/images/7/7d/ECOLITASTER.ppt Valencia 2006 PowerPoint presentation]
Example on how Valencia 2006 team used SimulLink to simulate their project: [http://www.igem.upv.es/igem06/images/7/7d/ECOLITASTER.ppt Valencia 2006 PowerPoint presentation]
===Output amplification===
Is it better to use TEV all the way or HIV1? Modelling should allows us to take decision which design is more efficient. If taken further, it will allow us to determine number of amplification steps that are most favourable.
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align: center; width: 40%; height: 170px;"
| [[Image:Model_output_010.jpg|450px|thumb|center|alt=A|TEV is used at both stages of amplification]]
| [[Image:Model_output_011.jpg|450px|thumb|center|alt=A|At each stage of amplification a distinct protease is being used ]]
|}

Revision as of 10:40, 27 July 2010

Have a look at this link: Synthetic Biology (Spring2008): Computer Modelling Practicals

Example on how Valencia 2006 team used SimulLink to simulate their project: Valencia 2006 PowerPoint presentation

Output amplification

Is it better to use TEV all the way or HIV1? Modelling should allows us to take decision which design is more efficient. If taken further, it will allow us to determine number of amplification steps that are most favourable.

A
TEV is used at both stages of amplification
A
At each stage of amplification a distinct protease is being used