IGEM:MIT/2006/Communications: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Smell test data (show photo of smell test in action and also bar graphs of results) | Smell test data (show photo of smell test in action and also bar graphs of results) | ||
[[Media:IGEM06Smelltest.xls|Jamboree smell test data]] (. | [[Media:IGEM06Smelltest.xls|Jamboree smell test data]] (xls) | ||
[[Media:MITiGEM2006Figure4.pdf|Bar graph of smell test results]] (pdf) | |||
===Figure 5=== | ===Figure 5=== |
Revision as of 15:23, 26 December 2007
Figure 1
- (a) normal e. coli (depict chemical inputs and outputs)
- (b) final eau d’e coli system (depict chemical inputs and outputs)
Figure 1 (pdf)
Figure 2
Device depictions (show one or two devices at the parts level, perhaps also show a device transfer function and also whatever the most relevant device data is, perhaps the GC data)- DONE (get graffle slide)
Figure 2 (pdf)
Figure 3
GC data (banana total synthesis, wintergreen total synthesis, banana with precursor, wintergreen with precursor)
Figure 4
Smell test data (show photo of smell test in action and also bar graphs of results)
Jamboree smell test data (xls)
Bar graph of smell test results (pdf)
Figure 5
Growth phase control (parts and device level depiction)
Figure 6
Show data with growth-phase control of FP output
Figure 7
Show GC data from banana time course
Figure S1
Restrospective project timeline. How long did each step take? [from this we can compute how we could do such work faster. We’ll want to work the pace of work into both the introduction and discussion].
Figure S2
Show GC data here (could have chromatograms)? GC data for IK cells versus normal E. coli; mint scented bacteria versus IK cells.