IGEM:MIT/2007/Heavy Metals
From OpenWetWare
Current revision (23:04, 13 July 2007) (view source) |
|||
| (30 intermediate revisions not shown.) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Reviews== | ==Reviews== | ||
| - | *A Good Overview (though slightly back-dated): Quantitative assessment of worldwide contamination of air, water and soil by trace metals [http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v333/n6169/abs/333134a0.html;jsessionid=1FEB054FF359CA663338BFE8FEE059DD] | + | *Excellent Summary of Bacterial Metal Resistance (a must read) |
| + | <biblio> | ||
| + | #Silver05 pmid=16133099 | ||
| + | </biblio> | ||
| + | *A Good Overview on Pollution (though slightly back-dated): Quantitative assessment of worldwide contamination of air, water and soil by trace metals [http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v333/n6169/abs/333134a0.html;jsessionid=1FEB054FF359CA663338BFE8FEE059DD] | ||
*A summary of Pollutants from the EPA [http://www.epa.gov/tri/tridata/tri04/ereport/2004eReport.pdf] | *A summary of Pollutants from the EPA [http://www.epa.gov/tri/tridata/tri04/ereport/2004eReport.pdf] | ||
| + | *Review Papers on Bioremediation | ||
| + | <biblio> | ||
| + | #Paul05 pmid=15734556 | ||
| + | #Valls02 pmid=12413663 | ||
| + | #Bruins00 pmid=10702338 | ||
| + | </biblio> | ||
| + | :*Paul - discusses advantages/disadvantages/problems of bioremediation | ||
| + | :*Bruins, Valls - discusses various kinds of bioremediation systems | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Heavy Metal Binding Proteins/Peptides== | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | There are several classes of metal binding proteins to consider. (for review, see Cobbett02, below) | ||
| + | |||
| + | First, those that bind to many metal types (Cd, Hg, Pb, Cu, Zn, etc). These are nice in that they are multifunctional, but the disadvantage is that they will also bind non-toxic ions like Zn, thus decreasing their efficiency. | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Metallothioneins (MT's) -- small animal proteins which contain many cysteine motifs (usually CxxC) | ||
| + | **Phytochelatins (PC's) -- plant peptides of the form (EC)n-G where n=# repeats (usually 2-10, but can be as many as 20) (see the Bae papers) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Also, certain artificially selected sequences bind selectively to certain metals. | ||
| + | **The MT-like motif CCAA was found to highly selective for Hg, while CAAC had broad specificity (see DeSilva02) | ||
| + | **The motif (CGCCG)3 was found to bind both cadmium and mercury (see Pazirandeh98) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Seems that Mejare01 does a nice job of comparing the different Cd-binding methods which have been tried. According to them, the methods which gave the biggest increase (>60-fold) in binding capacity were those that expressed entire MT proteins (or domains of them). '''However, they did not consider the papers where PCs were used, which seem to have much higher binding capacities.''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Bae papers seem to indicate that the EC20 motif can bind both Cd and Hg (higher affinity for Hg), and the absolute accumulation is higher than for the MT-derived peptides. Also, EC20 binding still works in the presence of up to 200mM salt and even EDTA. Might be a good idea to ask them for their Lpp-OmpA-EC20 expression construct! | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | '''Binding Sequences To Try''' | ||
| + | *The full Pazirandeh98 Hg/Cd-specific binding sequence (CGCCG) is: CGCCGKGHCGCCGKGHCGCCG | ||
| + | *For good non-specific binding, best bet seems to be the PC-derived EC20 sequence: (EC)20-Gly | ||
| + | |||
| + | *From DeSilva02, the MerP-derived Hg-specific binding sequence (GMTCCAA) could be repeated 3x: GMTCCAAGMTCCAAGMTCCAA | ||
| + | *For Cd-specific binding, could later use the CadA-derived sequence (GFTCANC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
<biblio> | <biblio> | ||
| - | # | + | #Samuelson00 pmid=10698802 |
| + | #Biosorbants pmid=9758845 | ||
| + | #Kotrba99 pmid=10049868 | ||
| + | #Mejare01 pmid=11164556 | ||
| + | #Lu01 pmid=11710062 | ||
| + | #Bae00 pmid=11042548 | ||
| + | #Bae01 pmid=11679366 | ||
| + | #Bae02 pmid=11803043 | ||
| + | #Kotrba99b pmid=10071794 | ||
| + | #Desilva02 pmid=12115136 | ||
| + | #Opella02 pmid=12039007 | ||
| + | #Sousa98 pmid=9573175 | ||
| + | #Mauro00 pmid=10736021 | ||
| + | #Cobbett02 pmid=12221971 | ||
| + | #Pazirandeh98 pmid=9758845 | ||
| + | #Chen98 pmid=9758654 | ||
</biblio> | </biblio> | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| + | ==Cadmium== | ||
| + | ===Summary=== | ||
| + | *Cd causes damage to cells primarily by the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which causes single-strand DNA damage and disrupts the synthesis of nucleic acids and proteins. Cd is also an inhibitor of the DNA mismatch repair system…Results of this study confirmed that Cd toxicity caused profound changes in gene expression in which several stress response systems were induced simultaneously. | ||
| + | *known carcinogen | ||
*Most recent(June06) paper on e.coli bioaccumulation of Cd | *Most recent(June06) paper on e.coli bioaccumulation of Cd | ||
<biblio> | <biblio> | ||
| Line 21: | Line 72: | ||
</biblio> | </biblio> | ||
| - | + | ===Contamination Levels/Limits=== | |
| - | * | + | *MCL(Maximum Containment Level): 5 ppb (equal to about 45nM) |
| + | *MCLG(Maximum Containment Level Goal): 5 ppb | ||
<biblio> | <biblio> | ||
#Staessen94 pmid=7911869 | #Staessen94 pmid=7911869 | ||
| Line 28: | Line 80: | ||
</biblio> | </biblio> | ||
| - | *Promoters | + | |
| + | ===Cadmium Contamination Sites=== | ||
| + | <biblio> | ||
| + | #Ishihara01 pmid=11376862 | ||
| + | </biblio> | ||
| + | :Plachimada, India: [http://www.indiaresource.org/documents/PlachimadaReportWaterPollution.pdf] | ||
| + | :**statistics on Pb, Cd, Cr levels in well water surrounding a Coca-Cola plant (2006) | ||
| + | :**pictures too :) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ===Promoters=== | ||
| + | Pubmed: Plasmid pI258 (from S.aureus) cadmium resistance (cadA) gene, complete cds [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/viewer.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=Nucleotide&list_uids=986930&dopt=GenBank&WebEnv=00h1mfSbNcrWnt_GeEAeAclSzZ4C1a1RZb7zt6pF-ZLWCiSSMjA-Di7PFSlt0aBL40bjiOJR7ssMw%40264002C567DCA7D0_0078SID&WebEnvRq=1] | ||
<biblio> | <biblio> | ||
#Brocklehurst03 pmid=12901859 | #Brocklehurst03 pmid=12901859 | ||
</biblio> | </biblio> | ||
| - | *contains sequence for ZntR/CadR and PzntA/PcadA | + | ::*Brocklehurst - contains sequence for ZntR/CadR and PzntA/PcadA |
** Semmie's article on CadC linked with GFP [http://www.springerlink.com/content/d4f4fk82bnh3j9jv/fulltext.pdf] | ** Semmie's article on CadC linked with GFP [http://www.springerlink.com/content/d4f4fk82bnh3j9jv/fulltext.pdf] | ||
==Mercury== | ==Mercury== | ||
| - | *MCL: 2 ppb | + | ===Contamination Levels/Limits=== |
| + | *MCL: 2 ppb (equal to about 10 nM) | ||
*MCLG: 2 ppb | *MCLG: 2 ppb | ||
*20 ppb makes the fish mercury buildup significant | *20 ppb makes the fish mercury buildup significant | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ===Polluted sites=== | |
| - | + | *Onondaga lake [http://www.aslf.org/OnondagaLake/] [http://www.aslf.org/ONONDAGALAKE/gallery1.html] [http://www.upstatefreshwater.org/html/onondaga_lake.html] | |
| - | + | *Salt Plains National Wildlife Refuge [http://ojas.ucok.edu/03/paper/daniels.htm] | |
| + | |||
| + | ===Detection (to assess our system)=== | ||
:*Gold Nanoparticles http://www.cah.ucf.edu/news/2005-Mercurynose.php | :*Gold Nanoparticles http://www.cah.ucf.edu/news/2005-Mercurynose.php | ||
| - | + | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Promoter=== | ||
<biblio> | <biblio> | ||
| + | #Hamlett92 pmid=1328156 | ||
| + | #Park92 pmid=1312997 | ||
| + | #Condee92 pmid=1334070 | ||
| + | #Gambill85 pmid=4092936 | ||
#<Hansen00 pmid=11094290> | #<Hansen00 pmid=11094290> | ||
</biblio> | </biblio> | ||
| - | :*Plasmid with Pmer, MerR, and reporter (lux, lac, or gfp) tested in e.coli | + | :*Condee - Contains sequence for merO/P region |
| + | :*Hansen - Plasmid with Pmer, MerR, and reporter (lux, lac, or gfp) tested in e.coli | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Sponge=== | ||
| + | * Accumulation of Hg ions in cell membrane [http://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/bbb/71/6/1494/_pdf] | ||
==Current Industry Filtration Techniques== | ==Current Industry Filtration Techniques== | ||
Mercury: approved by EPA - Coagulation/Filtration; Granular Activated Carbon; Lime softening; Reverse osmosis. | Mercury: approved by EPA - Coagulation/Filtration; Granular Activated Carbon; Lime softening; Reverse osmosis. | ||
Current revision
Contents |
Reviews
- Excellent Summary of Bacterial Metal Resistance (a must read)
- Silver S and Phung le T. . pmid:16133099.
- A Good Overview on Pollution (though slightly back-dated): Quantitative assessment of worldwide contamination of air, water and soil by trace metals [1]
- A summary of Pollutants from the EPA [2]
- Review Papers on Bioremediation
- Paul D, Pandey G, Pandey J, and Jain RK. . pmid:15734556.
- Valls M and de Lorenzo V. . pmid:12413663.
- Bruins MR, Kapil S, and Oehme FW. . pmid:10702338.
- Paul - discusses advantages/disadvantages/problems of bioremediation
- Bruins, Valls - discusses various kinds of bioremediation systems
Heavy Metal Binding Proteins/Peptides
There are several classes of metal binding proteins to consider. (for review, see Cobbett02, below)
First, those that bind to many metal types (Cd, Hg, Pb, Cu, Zn, etc). These are nice in that they are multifunctional, but the disadvantage is that they will also bind non-toxic ions like Zn, thus decreasing their efficiency.
- Metallothioneins (MT's) -- small animal proteins which contain many cysteine motifs (usually CxxC)
- Phytochelatins (PC's) -- plant peptides of the form (EC)n-G where n=# repeats (usually 2-10, but can be as many as 20) (see the Bae papers)
Also, certain artificially selected sequences bind selectively to certain metals.
- The MT-like motif CCAA was found to highly selective for Hg, while CAAC had broad specificity (see DeSilva02)
- The motif (CGCCG)3 was found to bind both cadmium and mercury (see Pazirandeh98)
Seems that Mejare01 does a nice job of comparing the different Cd-binding methods which have been tried. According to them, the methods which gave the biggest increase (>60-fold) in binding capacity were those that expressed entire MT proteins (or domains of them). However, they did not consider the papers where PCs were used, which seem to have much higher binding capacities.
The Bae papers seem to indicate that the EC20 motif can bind both Cd and Hg (higher affinity for Hg), and the absolute accumulation is higher than for the MT-derived peptides. Also, EC20 binding still works in the presence of up to 200mM salt and even EDTA. Might be a good idea to ask them for their Lpp-OmpA-EC20 expression construct!
Binding Sequences To Try
- The full Pazirandeh98 Hg/Cd-specific binding sequence (CGCCG) is: CGCCGKGHCGCCGKGHCGCCG
- For good non-specific binding, best bet seems to be the PC-derived EC20 sequence: (EC)20-Gly
- From DeSilva02, the MerP-derived Hg-specific binding sequence (GMTCCAA) could be repeated 3x: GMTCCAAGMTCCAAGMTCCAA
- For Cd-specific binding, could later use the CadA-derived sequence (GFTCANC)
- Samuelson P, Wernérus H, Svedberg M, and Ståhl S. . pmid:10698802.
- Pazirandeh M, Wells BM, and Ryan RL. . pmid:9758845.
- Kotrba P, Dolecková L, de Lorenzo V, and Ruml T. . pmid:10049868.
- Mejáre M and Bülow L. . pmid:11164556.
- Lu Y, Berry SM, and Pfister TD. . pmid:11710062.
- Bae W, Chen W, Mulchandani A, and Mehra RK. . pmid:11042548.
- Bae W, Mehra RK, Mulchandani A, and Chen W. . pmid:11679366.
- Bae W, Mulchandani A, and Chen W. . pmid:11803043.
- Kotrba P, Pospisil P, de Lorenzo V, and Ruml T. . pmid:10071794.
- DeSilva TM, Veglia G, Porcelli F, Prantner AM, and Opella SJ. . pmid:12115136.
- Opella SJ, DeSilva TM, and Veglia G. . pmid:12039007.
- Sousa C, Kotrba P, Ruml T, Cebolla A, and De Lorenzo V. . pmid:9573175.
- Mauro JM and Pazirandeh M. . pmid:10736021.
- Cobbett C and Goldsbrough P. . pmid:12221971.
- Pazirandeh M, Wells BM, and Ryan RL. . pmid:9758845.
- Chen S, Kim E, Shuler ML, and Wilson DB. . pmid:9758654.
Cadmium
Summary
- Cd causes damage to cells primarily by the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which causes single-strand DNA damage and disrupts the synthesis of nucleic acids and proteins. Cd is also an inhibitor of the DNA mismatch repair system…Results of this study confirmed that Cd toxicity caused profound changes in gene expression in which several stress response systems were induced simultaneously.
- known carcinogen
- Most recent(June06) paper on e.coli bioaccumulation of Cd
- Deng X, Yi XE, and Liu G. . pmid:16890348.
Contamination Levels/Limits
- MCL(Maximum Containment Level): 5 ppb (equal to about 45nM)
- MCLG(Maximum Containment Level Goal): 5 ppb
- Staessen JA, Lauwerys RR, Ide G, Roels HA, Vyncke G, and Amery A. . pmid:7911869.
- Satarug S, Baker JR, Urbenjapol S, Haswell-Elkins M, Reilly PE, Williams DJ, and Moore MR. . pmid:12505433.
Cadmium Contamination Sites
- Ishihara T, Kobayashi E, Okubo Y, Suwazono Y, Kido T, Nishijyo M, Nakagawa H, and Nogawa K. . pmid:11376862.
- Plachimada, India: [3]
- statistics on Pb, Cd, Cr levels in well water surrounding a Coca-Cola plant (2006)
- pictures too :)
Promoters
Pubmed: Plasmid pI258 (from S.aureus) cadmium resistance (cadA) gene, complete cds [4]
- Brocklehurst KR, Megit SJ, and Morby AP. . pmid:12901859.
- Brocklehurst - contains sequence for ZntR/CadR and PzntA/PcadA
- Semmie's article on CadC linked with GFP [5]
Mercury
Contamination Levels/Limits
- MCL: 2 ppb (equal to about 10 nM)
- MCLG: 2 ppb
- 20 ppb makes the fish mercury buildup significant
Polluted sites
Detection (to assess our system)
- Gold Nanoparticles http://www.cah.ucf.edu/news/2005-Mercurynose.php
Promoter
- Hamlett NV, Landale EC, Davis BH, and Summers AO. . pmid:1328156.
- Park SJ, Wireman J, and Summers AO. . pmid:1312997.
- Condee CW and Summers AO. . pmid:1334070.
- Gambill BD and Summers AO. . pmid:4092936.
- Hansen LH and Sørensen SJ. . pmid:11094290.
- Condee - Contains sequence for merO/P region
- Hansen - Plasmid with Pmer, MerR, and reporter (lux, lac, or gfp) tested in e.coli
Sponge
- Accumulation of Hg ions in cell membrane [10]
Current Industry Filtration Techniques
Mercury: approved by EPA - Coagulation/Filtration; Granular Activated Carbon; Lime softening; Reverse osmosis.


