IGEM:Melbourne/2008/BioClock/Website: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I propose 2 ways to proceed. One is to learn from evolutionary history of biological systems on how biological clock is made. This approach has the advantage of learning what sort of biochemistry may be required for building a clock. | I propose 2 ways to proceed. One is to learn from evolutionary history of biological systems on how biological clock is made. This approach has the advantage of learning what sort of biochemistry may be required for building a clock. | ||
Circadian clock (http://www.openwetware.org/wiki/BIO254:Pacemaker) | Circadian clock (http://www.openwetware.org/wiki/BIO254:Pacemaker) | ||
The other way is to learn from human engineered clock to see what internal design features they have. | The other way is to learn from human engineered clock to see what internal design features they have. | ||
Revision as of 22:50, 5 January 2008
I propose 2 ways to proceed. One is to learn from evolutionary history of biological systems on how biological clock is made. This approach has the advantage of learning what sort of biochemistry may be required for building a clock.
Circadian clock (http://www.openwetware.org/wiki/BIO254:Pacemaker)
The other way is to learn from human engineered clock to see what internal design features they have.
