IGEM:Melbourne/2008/WikiManagement/OtherTeams: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
* Intro good | * Intro good | ||
-What the project was | - What the project was | ||
-What they had achieved | - What they had achieved | ||
- What it could achieve in the future (applications) | |||
== '''PRE''' == | == '''PRE''' == | ||
Revision as of 01:02, 4 April 2008
FINAL
ETHZ 2007
Good
- ETH Zurich drop down bar on each page
- ETHZ banner on each page leads to homepage
- Vistor count at the bottom of the page
- Nice meet the team page
Bad
- First page too dense
Harvard 2007
- Intro good
- What the project was
- What they had achieved
- What it could achieve in the future (applications)
PRE
Brown 2007
- Border around front page?
- Public page - www.brownigem.com -
- They had a video that got onto the OWW and synbio front page last year - do we want to do this ?
Harvard 2007
- Good layout
- Links to tools (plasmid mappers, blast2seq etc...) frequently used stuff
- Detailed protocols of experiments to date good
- should we include protocols when reporting what was done each day or would we prefer to link it to a separate page of protocols like Peking’s?
- Repeat of details of the same experiment done on a different day not required.
- could just list changes (if any) made to protocol.
Imperial 2007
- breaking news section
