IGEM:Melbourne/2008/WikiManagement/OtherTeams

From OpenWetWare

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 31: Line 31:
''Cambridge 2006''
''Cambridge 2006''
* icon layout ... easy information to grasp .. i like| needs better icons though
* icon layout ... easy information to grasp .. i like| needs better icons though
-
 
-
 
-
''Harvard 2006''
 
-
* for visitors section ... do we direct people to different section based on prior knowledge?
 
''Imperial 2006''
''Imperial 2006''
-
* interesting process flow chart on front page  
+
* [http://parts2.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Imperial_College_2006|interesting process flow chart on front page ]
* very very good at colums  
* very very good at colums  
Line 48: Line 44:
== '''PRE''' ==
== '''PRE''' ==
-
''Brown 2007''
+
''[http://www.openwetware.org/wiki/IGEM:Brown/2007|Brown 2007]''
* Border around front page?  
* Border around front page?  
* Public page - www.brownigem.com -   
* Public page - www.brownigem.com -   
Line 75: Line 71:
''Alberta 2007''
''Alberta 2007''
*[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/images/1/1a/Alberta_gantt.jpeg| wow they used a gantt chart ]
*[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/images/1/1a/Alberta_gantt.jpeg| wow they used a gantt chart ]
 +
 +
 +
 +
''Harvard 2006''
 +
* [http://openwetware.org/wiki/IGEM:Harvard/2006|for visitors section ... do we direct people to different section based on prior knowledge?]
 +
 +
== '''GENERAL IDEAS''' ==
== '''GENERAL IDEAS''' ==

Revision as of 06:28, 6 April 2008

Return to Melbourne Homepage


FINAL

ETHZ 2007

  • Good
    • ETH Zurich drop down bar on each page
    • ETHZ banner on each page leads to homepage
    • Vistor count at the bottom of the page
    • Nice meet the team page
  • Not so good
    • First page too dense


Harvard 2007

  • Intro good - What the project was, What they had achieved, What it could achieve in the future (applications)


UC Berkeley 2007

  • Nice brief description of the different components (with links to pages with details including results).
    • Do we want to introduce the components on the front page?


Chiba 2006

  • nice sort of layout on the front page


Cambridge 2006

  • icon layout ... easy information to grasp .. i like| needs better icons though


Imperial 2006

Imperial 2007 really good tabs on the top of the page


PRE

2007

  • Border around front page?
  • Public page - www.brownigem.com -
    • They had a video that got onto the OWW and synbio front page last year - do we want to do this ?


Harvard 2007

  • Good layout
  • Links to tools (plasmid mappers, blast2seq etc...) frequently used stuff
  • Detailed protocols of experiments to date--good
  • should we include protocols when reporting what was done each day or would we prefer to link it to a separate page of protocols like Peking’s?
  • Repeat of details of the same experiment done on a different day not required.
  • could just list changes (if any) made to protocol.
  • a just for fun section ... we need to have more fun as a team... i say fridays at AO - (Animal Orchestra) or the pub


Imperial 2007


Brown 2006

  • front page ... emphasises the right things ... (big font = important links - todo list, meetings, biobricks, overview etc)


Alberta 2007


Harvard 2006


GENERAL IDEAS

  • team photo somewhere on both
  • photo(s) of Bio21 ... taken by us not generic
  • border design?
  • presentation section ... devoted purely to stuff to do with the presentation (berkeley 06)
  • calagary 06 nicely design banners/logo? (ie. not done in paint) - we all have friends that could whip something together thats fairly spiffy ;)
  • indiviuals photos in the team profiles ... standardise the profiles
  • poster design mini-team and section on the wiki...
  • archive section
Personal tools