IGEM:Melbourne/2008/WikiManagement/OtherTeams

From OpenWetWare

< IGEM:Melbourne | 2008 | WikiManagement(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Current revision (23:41, 1 May 2008) (view source)
('''FINAL''')
 
(16 intermediate revisions not shown.)
Line 4: Line 4:
== '''FINAL'''==
== '''FINAL'''==
-
''[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/ETHZ| ETHZ 2007]''
+
''[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/ETHZ ETHZ 2007]''
*Good
*Good
** ETH Zurich drop down bar on each page
** ETH Zurich drop down bar on each page
 +
*** i like this very much, especially how it scrolls automatically to the corresponding section on the page -''Sh''
 +
*** we could also have "Go to Top of page" links on long pages
** ETHZ banner on each page leads to homepage
** ETHZ banner on each page leads to homepage
** Vistor count at the bottom of the page
** Vistor count at the bottom of the page
Line 13: Line 15:
*Not so good
*Not so good
** First page too dense
** First page too dense
 +
** Agreed, provide a little information and then link to a more heavy page - ''St''
-
''[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/Harvard| Harvard 2007]''
+
''[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/Harvard Harvard 2007]''
-
* Intro good - What the project was, What they had achieved, What it could achieve in the future (applications)
+
* Intro good - What the project was, What they had achieved, What it could achieve in the future (applications) -''Sh''
 +
* No navigation/signposting though -''St''
 +
* Does link to detailed wiki, but all the way down the bottom - ''St''
 +
* Contents good, but don't like their 1-page style. - ''Di''
-
''[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/Berkeley_UC| UC Berkeley 2007]''
+
''[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/Berkeley_UC UC Berkeley 2007]''
-
* Nice brief description of the different components (with links to pages with details including results)
+
* Very good explanation of project and reasons for it right up the top - ''St''
 +
* Nice brief description of the different components (with links to pages with details including results) -''Sh''
** Do we want to introduce the components on the front page?  
** Do we want to introduce the components on the front page?  
-
** icons again!!
+
* icons again!!
-
** colour scheme? - blueish maybe.. blood is red that is fair enough  
+
* colour scheme? - blueish maybe.. blood is red that is fair enough  
-
** i like the animated gif ... moving stuff is appealing to the eye... easy to do ...  
+
* i like the animated gif ... moving stuff is appealing to the eye... easy to do ...  
 +
** Animation of the "Clock" in action for our front page? (Like in the presentation?) - ''St''
 +
* Very good in general. The style fits well under the general "theme" of iGEM. Precise and straight forward way of explaining their work. - ''Di''
-
 
+
''[http://parts2.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Chiba_University%2C_Japan_2006 Chiba 2006]''
-
''[http://parts2.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Chiba_University%2C_Japan_2006| Chiba 2006]''
+
* nice sort of layout on the front page  
* nice sort of layout on the front page  
-
 
+
* well-structured web pages. easy to understand the purpose of their site and work they have done. a bit dislike their cartoonish feature. - ''Di''
''Cambridge 2006''
''Cambridge 2006''
-
* [http://parts2.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Cambridge_University_2006| icon layout] ... easy information to grasp .. i like| needs better icons though
+
* [http://parts2.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Cambridge_University_2006 icon layout] ... easy information to grasp .. i like| needs better icons though
 +
* Again, too dense to read all at once. - ''St''
''Imperial 2006''
''Imperial 2006''
-
* [http://parts2.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Imperial_College_2006| interesting process flow chart on front page ]
+
* [http://parts2.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Imperial_College_2006 interesting process flow chart on front page ]
* very very good at colums  
* very very good at colums  
 +
* Nice and clear overview of their project and achievement. Well structured. - ''Di''
''Imperial 2007''
''Imperial 2007''
-
[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/Imperial| really good tabs on the top of the page]
+
[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/Imperial really good tabs on the top of the page]
 +
* separate wet lab/dry lab sections -''Sh''
''Glasgow''
''Glasgow''
-
*[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/Glasgow| nice and simple front page] ... i like this simplicity, but with icons :)  
+
*[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/Glasgow nice and simple front page] ... i like this simplicity, but with icons :)
 +
** Seconded. This is about what we want for a front page (except prettier). - ''St''
-
''[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/Ljubljana| Ljubljana]''
+
''[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/Ljubljana Ljubljana]''
* columned layout
* columned layout
* animation of the project ... grab these of the presentations...  
* animation of the project ... grab these of the presentations...  
 +
** Animations good for explaining a lot of information in an easy to understand manner. - ''St''
* visitor numbers and locations ... down the bottom
* visitor numbers and locations ... down the bottom
* very simple banner ... they then put out flyers and stuff... i think it'd hilarious if we marketed this as a swiss clock/watch alternative and gave out a brochure ... :p
* very simple banner ... they then put out flyers and stuff... i think it'd hilarious if we marketed this as a swiss clock/watch alternative and gave out a brochure ... :p
-
 
+
* Looks like a business website on the general appearance, but animation of explaination is good. - ''Di''
== '''PRE''' ==
== '''PRE''' ==
-
''[http://www.openwetware.org/wiki/IGEM:Brown/2007| Brown 2007]''
+
''[http://www.openwetware.org/wiki/IGEM:Brown/2007 Brown 2007]''
* Border around front page?  
* Border around front page?  
* Public page - www.brownigem.com -   
* Public page - www.brownigem.com -   
Line 63: Line 76:
-
''[http://www.openwetware.org/wiki/IGEM:Harvard/2007| Harvard 2007]''
+
''[http://www.openwetware.org/wiki/IGEM:Harvard/2007 Harvard 2007]''
* Good layout  
* Good layout  
* Links to tools (plasmid mappers, blast2seq etc...) frequently used stuff
* Links to tools (plasmid mappers, blast2seq etc...) frequently used stuff
-
* Detailed protocols of experiments to date--good  
+
* Detailed protocols of experiments to date--good -''Sh''
-
*should we include protocols when reporting what was done each day or would we prefer to link it to a separate page of protocols like Peking’s?
+
** but probably better to link it to a separate page of protocols like Peking’s (to avoid redundancy)
-
* Repeat of details of the same experiment done on a different day not required.
+
 
-
*could just list changes (if any) made to protocol.
+
* a just for fun section ... we need to have more fun as a team... i say fridays at AO - (Animal Orchestra) or the pub
* a just for fun section ... we need to have more fun as a team... i say fridays at AO - (Animal Orchestra) or the pub
Line 75: Line 87:
''Imperial 2007''
''Imperial 2007''
-
*[http://www.openwetware.org/wiki/IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007| breaking news section] just make it red ;)
+
*[http://www.openwetware.org/wiki/IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007 breaking news section] just make it red ;)
''Brown 2006''
''Brown 2006''
-
*[http://parts2.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Brown:iGEM_portal_2006| concise front page] ... emphasises the right things ... (big font = important links - todo list, meetings, biobricks, overview etc)
+
*[http://parts2.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Brown:iGEM_portal_2006 concise front page] ... emphasises the right things ... (big font = important links - todo list, meetings, biobricks, overview etc)
''Alberta 2007''
''Alberta 2007''
-
*[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/images/1/1a/Alberta_gantt.jpeg| wow they used a gantt chart ]
+
*[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/images/1/1a/Alberta_gantt.jpeg wow they used a gantt chart ]
''Harvard 2006''
''Harvard 2006''
-
* [http://openwetware.org/wiki/IGEM:Harvard/2006| for visitors section ... do we direct people to different section based on prior knowledge?]
+
* [http://openwetware.org/wiki/IGEM:Harvard/2006 for visitors section ... do we direct people to different section based on prior knowledge?]
-
 
+
-
 
+
== '''GENERAL IDEAS''' ==
== '''GENERAL IDEAS''' ==
Line 98: Line 108:
*border design?
*border design?
*presentation section ... devoted purely to stuff to do with the presentation (berkeley 06)
*presentation section ... devoted purely to stuff to do with the presentation (berkeley 06)
-
*[http://parts2.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/University_of_Calgary_2006| calagary 06] nicely design banners/logo? (ie. not done in paint) - we all have friends that could whip something together thats fairly spiffy ;)
+
*[http://parts2.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/University_of_Calgary_2006 calagary 06] nicely design banners/logo? (ie. not done in paint) - we all have friends that could whip something together thats fairly spiffy ;)
* indiviuals photos in the team profiles ... standardise the profiles  
* indiviuals photos in the team profiles ... standardise the profiles  
* poster design mini-team and section on the wiki...
* poster design mini-team and section on the wiki...
* archive section
* archive section
 +
 +
*Final
 +
** Front page small and succinct with lots of pictures
 +
** Animation very good idea
 +
** Medium level of detail on Final wiki, links to appropriate page of pre wiki for further detail

Current revision

Return to Melbourne Homepage


FINAL

ETHZ 2007

  • Good
    • ETH Zurich drop down bar on each page
      • i like this very much, especially how it scrolls automatically to the corresponding section on the page -Sh
      • we could also have "Go to Top of page" links on long pages
    • ETHZ banner on each page leads to homepage
    • Vistor count at the bottom of the page
    • Nice meet the team page
  • Not so good
    • First page too dense
    • Agreed, provide a little information and then link to a more heavy page - St


Harvard 2007

  • Intro good - What the project was, What they had achieved, What it could achieve in the future (applications) -Sh
  • No navigation/signposting though -St
  • Does link to detailed wiki, but all the way down the bottom - St
  • Contents good, but don't like their 1-page style. - Di


UC Berkeley 2007

  • Very good explanation of project and reasons for it right up the top - St
  • Nice brief description of the different components (with links to pages with details including results) -Sh
    • Do we want to introduce the components on the front page?
  • icons again!!
  • colour scheme? - blueish maybe.. blood is red that is fair enough
  • i like the animated gif ... moving stuff is appealing to the eye... easy to do ...
    • Animation of the "Clock" in action for our front page? (Like in the presentation?) - St
  • Very good in general. The style fits well under the general "theme" of iGEM. Precise and straight forward way of explaining their work. - Di


Chiba 2006

  • nice sort of layout on the front page
  • well-structured web pages. easy to understand the purpose of their site and work they have done. a bit dislike their cartoonish feature. - Di

Cambridge 2006

  • icon layout ... easy information to grasp .. i like| needs better icons though
  • Again, too dense to read all at once. - St


Imperial 2006

Imperial 2007 really good tabs on the top of the page

  • separate wet lab/dry lab sections -Sh


Glasgow

  • nice and simple front page ... i like this simplicity, but with icons :)
    • Seconded. This is about what we want for a front page (except prettier). - St


Ljubljana

  • columned layout
  • animation of the project ... grab these of the presentations...
    • Animations good for explaining a lot of information in an easy to understand manner. - St
  • visitor numbers and locations ... down the bottom
  • very simple banner ... they then put out flyers and stuff... i think it'd hilarious if we marketed this as a swiss clock/watch alternative and gave out a brochure ... :p
  • Looks like a business website on the general appearance, but animation of explaination is good. - Di

PRE

Brown 2007

  • Border around front page?
  • Public page - www.brownigem.com -
    • They had a video that got onto the OWW and synbio front page last year - do we want to do this ?


Harvard 2007

  • Good layout
  • Links to tools (plasmid mappers, blast2seq etc...) frequently used stuff
  • Detailed protocols of experiments to date--good -Sh
    • but probably better to link it to a separate page of protocols like Peking’s (to avoid redundancy)
  • a just for fun section ... we need to have more fun as a team... i say fridays at AO - (Animal Orchestra) or the pub


Imperial 2007


Brown 2006

  • concise front page ... emphasises the right things ... (big font = important links - todo list, meetings, biobricks, overview etc)


Alberta 2007


Harvard 2006

GENERAL IDEAS

  • team photo somewhere on both
  • photo(s) of Bio21 ... taken by us not generic
  • border design?
  • presentation section ... devoted purely to stuff to do with the presentation (berkeley 06)
  • calagary 06 nicely design banners/logo? (ie. not done in paint) - we all have friends that could whip something together thats fairly spiffy ;)
  • indiviuals photos in the team profiles ... standardise the profiles
  • poster design mini-team and section on the wiki...
  • archive section
  • Final
    • Front page small and succinct with lots of pictures
    • Animation very good idea
    • Medium level of detail on Final wiki, links to appropriate page of pre wiki for further detail
Personal tools