IGEM:Melbourne/2008/WikiManagement/OtherTeams: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[IGEM:Melbourne/2008|Return to Melbourne Homepage]] | [[IGEM:Melbourne/2008|Return to Melbourne Homepage]] | ||
===ETHZ 2007 | |||
== '''FINAL''' == | |||
===ETHZ 2007=== | |||
'''Good''' | '''Good''' | ||
| Line 16: | Line 19: | ||
===Brown 2007 | == '''PRE''' == | ||
===Brown 2007=== | |||
* Border around front page? | * Border around front page? | ||
| Line 23: | Line 29: | ||
===Harvard 2007 | ===Harvard 2007=== | ||
* Good layout | * Good layout | ||
| Line 32: | Line 38: | ||
**could just list changes (if any) made to protocol. | **could just list changes (if any) made to protocol. | ||
===Imperial 2007 | |||
===Imperial 2007=== | |||
*breaking news section | *breaking news section | ||
Revision as of 00:54, 4 April 2008
FINAL
ETHZ 2007
Good
- ETH Zurich drop down bar on each page
- ETHZ banner on each page leads to homepage
- Vistor count at the bottom of the page
- Nice meet the team page
Bad
- First page too dense
PRE
Brown 2007
- Border around front page?
- Public page - www.brownigem.com -
- They had a video that got onto the OWW and synbio front page last year - do we want to do this ?
Harvard 2007
- Good layout
- Links to tools (plasmid mappers, blast2seq etc...) frequently used stuff
- Detailed protocols of experiments to date good
- should we include protocols when reporting what was done each day or would we prefer to link it to a separate page of protocols like Peking’s?
- Repeat of details of the same experiment done on a different day not required.
- could just list changes (if any) made to protocol.
Imperial 2007
- breaking news section
