< IGEM:Melbourne | 2008 | WikiManagement
- ETH Zurich drop down bar on each page
- ETHZ banner on each page leads to homepage
- Vistor count at the bottom of the page
- Nice meet the team page
- Not so good
- First page too dense
- Intro good - What the project was, What they had achieved, What it could achieve in the future (applications)
UC Berkeley 2007
- Nice brief description of the different components (with links to pages with details including results).
- Do we want to introduce the components on the front page?
- nice sort of layout on the front page
- Border around front page?
- Public page - www.brownigem.com -
- They had a video that got onto the OWW and synbio front page last year - do we want to do this ?
- Good layout
- Links to tools (plasmid mappers, blast2seq etc...) frequently used stuff
- Detailed protocols of experiments to date--good
- should we include protocols when reporting what was done each day or would we prefer to link it to a separate page of protocols like Peking’s?
- Repeat of details of the same experiment done on a different day not required.
- could just list changes (if any) made to protocol.
- breaking news section
- concise front page ... emphasises the right things ... (big font = important links - todo list, meetings, biobricks, overview etc)
- team photo somewhere on both
- photo(s) of Bio21 ... taken by us not generic
- border design?
- presentation section ... devoted purely to stuff to do with the presentation (berkeley 06)
- calagary 06 nicely design banners/logo? (ie. not done in paint) - we all have friends that could whip something together thats fairly spiffy ;)