IGEM:Paris Bettencourt 2012/Notebooks/modularity group: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→Cambridge 2010) |
m (→Cambridge 2010) |
||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
==Cambridge 2010== | ==Cambridge 2010== | ||
We have | We have the biobrick we want to use (but there are 2 in fact): '''2012 Kit Plate 4''' well '''17M''', resistance: C | ||
But should we go on with that project? it uses the pBad promoter. | |||
==Bristol 2010== | ==Bristol 2010== | ||
Revision as of 02:24, 2 July 2012
Purpuse of this group
Projects
PKU 2010
concept
the circuit
comment on the modularity
Cambridge 2010
concept
link: [1]
the circuit
comment on the modularity
Bristol 2010
concept
link: [2]
the circuit
comment on the modularity
Hongkong 2011
concept
the circuit
comment on the modularity
What we are doing now
PKU 2010
communication, requests of plasmids. searching for mercury, it seems that we need 2 strains: BL21DE3 and DH5 alpha depending of the part of the project we want to do. (both?)
Cambridge 2010
We have the biobrick we want to use (but there are 2 in fact): 2012 Kit Plate 4 well 17M, resistance: C But should we go on with that project? it uses the pBad promoter.
Bristol 2010
We have the biobrick: complete system: 2012 Kit Plate 4 well 1A, resistance: C
finding nitrates?
Hongkong 2011
complete system: 2012 Kit Plate 5 well 21I --> transformation?
