IGEM:Paris Bettencourt 2012/Notebooks/modularity group: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
=What we are doing now= | =What we are doing now= | ||
[[Paris Bettencourt 2012/Notebook/modularity group/day_by_day| Here the daily notebook]] | [[Paris Bettencourt 2012/Notebook/modularity group/day_by_day| Here the daily notebook]] | ||
[[Paris Bettencourt 2012/Notebook/modularity group/plasmids_registery| Here our plasmids registery]] | [[Paris Bettencourt 2012/Notebook/modularity group/plasmids_registery| Here our plasmids registery]] | ||
[[Paris Bettencourt 2012/Notebook/modularity group/strains_registery| Here our strains registery]] | [[Paris Bettencourt 2012/Notebook/modularity group/strains_registery| Here our strains registery]] | ||
Revision as of 03:34, 3 July 2012
Purpuse of this group
Projects
PKU 2010 [1]
concept
the circuit
comment on the modularity
Cambridge 2010 [2]
concept
the circuit
comment on the modularity
Bristol 2010 [3]
encapsulation technique:[ http://www.freepatentsonline.com/5093253.html]
concept
the circuit
http://2010.igem.org/wiki/images/9/99/Part.png
comment on the modularity
What we are doing now
PKU 2010
communication, requests of plasmids. searching for mercury, it seems that we need 2 strains: BL21DE3 and DH5 alpha depending of the part of the project we want to do. (both?)
Cambridge 2010
We have the biobrick we want to use (but there are 2 in fact): 2012 Kit Plate 4 well 17M, resistance: C But should we go on with that project? it uses the pBad promoter.
Bristol 2010
We have the biobrick: complete system: 2012 Kit Plate 4 well 1A, resistance: C
finding nitrates?