IGEM:Stanford/2010/Notebook/31 March 2010: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<div style="width:720px;text-align:justify"> | <div style="width:720px;text-align:justify"> | ||
==Meeting Agenda== | |||
Watched the following presentations prior to the meeting: | Watched the following presentations prior to the meeting: | ||
Revision as of 18:24, 31 March 2010
<html> <head> <style type="text/css"> body{background:#FFFFCC} table.menu{ background:#990000; padding:5px; color:black; } font.cell{ font-family:Verdana; font-size:14px; font-style:normal; color:#ffffff; width:99px; text-align:center; padding:0px } font.cell:hover{font-weight:bold; cursor:pointer; text-decoration:none } img{padding-bottom:5px} a.menu{text-decoration:none; color:white} a.menu:visited{text-decoration:none; color:white} </style> </head> </html>
|
Meeting Agenda
Watched the following presentations prior to the meeting:
1. Cambridge 2009
2. ArtScienceBangalore 2009
3. MIT 2006
4. Caltech 2008
Considered the following questions during the meeting (with regard to the above presentations):
1. What do you think makes a good igem Project?
2. Personal Likes and Dislike and why
3. Using these presentations, how should we go about developing a project?
Considered other projects not listed above