IGEM:UNAM LCG/2009/Notebook/Hydrobium etli/2011/09/18: Difference between revisions
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
*Final: 2 min, 72°C | *Final: 2 min, 72°C | ||
===Results=== | |||
I ran a gel to check out the result of the PCR and the final concentration of the products. Nothing appear in the gel. | |||
====Gel details==== | |||
* Concentration: Agarose 1% | |||
* 2μL dye + 3μL sample | |||
* 2μL ladder 500 + 1μL dye. | |||
* Run: 35 min, 130 volts | |||
====Gel immage==== | |||
Lanes: | |||
1. pBBR1MCS-5 sample-3 no diluted (No PCR) | |||
2. pBBR1MCS-5 sample-3 no diluted (PCR, tube 1) | |||
3. pBBR1MCS-5 sample-3 1/10 diluted (PCR, tube 2) | |||
4. ladder | |||
5. pBBR1MCS-5 sample-4 no diluted (No PCR) | |||
6. pBBR1MCS-5 sample-4 no diluted (PCR, tube 3) | |||
7. pBBR1MCS-5 sample-4 no diluted (PCR, tube 4) | |||
[[Image:PBBR1MCS-5_PCR.JPG]] | |||
====Gel analysis==== | |||
There was no ammplification, the lines in the gel are not visible. It is strange that lanes 1 and 5 are also empty because this means that there is no plasmid in there, so probably we never put any template DNA into the PCR. Maybe the plasmid extraction did not work out. | |||
<!-- ## Do not edit below this line unless you know what you are doing. ## --> | <!-- ## Do not edit below this line unless you know what you are doing. ## --> |
Revision as of 15:15, 18 September 2011
iGEM Project name 1 | <html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> Main project page <html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>Previous entry<html> </html>Next entry<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html> | ||||||||||||||||||
pBBR1MCS-5 extraction by PCRAbstractI and Helena Reyes made a PCR from an extraction that she had made. The objective was to amplify and obtain the plasmid pBBR1MCS-5 without the RFP and its promoter in order to use the lasmid as vector to insert the anderson's promoter collection. Apparently nothing was amplified, but it is curious that there are no bands neither for the lanes that had the supposed plasmid before the amplification, this means that probably the PCR did not fail, I think the problem was that we never introduced any template DNA (the plasmid) may be because the extraction failed. DetailsTo make the PCR I used the NEB™ Phusion High-Fidelity DNA polymerase: details, to define the reactives consentrations and PCR steps I checked out the protocol for the enzyme: protocol. I made 4 reactions, I had two different pBBR1MCS-5 samples, I made a 1/10 dilution for each. I ran a PCR for each sample diluted and not diluted. Reactive ammounts
Reactive details
Run details
ResultsI ran a gel to check out the result of the PCR and the final concentration of the products. Nothing appear in the gel. Gel details
Gel immageLanes: 1. pBBR1MCS-5 sample-3 no diluted (No PCR) 2. pBBR1MCS-5 sample-3 no diluted (PCR, tube 1) 3. pBBR1MCS-5 sample-3 1/10 diluted (PCR, tube 2) 4. ladder 5. pBBR1MCS-5 sample-4 no diluted (No PCR) 6. pBBR1MCS-5 sample-4 no diluted (PCR, tube 3) 7. pBBR1MCS-5 sample-4 no diluted (PCR, tube 4) Gel analysisThere was no ammplification, the lines in the gel are not visible. It is strange that lanes 1 and 5 are also empty because this means that there is no plasmid in there, so probably we never put any template DNA into the PCR. Maybe the plasmid extraction did not work out. |