IGEM:UNAM LCG/2009/Notebook/Hydrobium etli/2011/09/19: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
===Notes=== | ===Notes=== | ||
The tubes are in my rack, the next step is to make a PCR from this parts to extract the plasmid backbone. | The tubes are in my rack, the next step is to make a PCR from this parts to extract the plasmid backbone. | ||
<!-- ## Do not edit below this line unless you know what you are doing. ## --> | <!-- ## Do not edit below this line unless you know what you are doing. ## --> |
Revision as of 17:36, 21 September 2011
iGEM Project name 1 | <html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> Main project page <html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>Previous entry<html> </html>Next entry<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html> |
pBBR1MCS-5 plasmid extractionAbstractVladimir helped me by making a plasmid pBBR1MCS-5 extraction from 4 different colonies: colony 1, colony 2, colony DH5α, colony S17. I ran a gel to see if the extraction were OK. I conclude that the extraction was succesfully done, the plasmid from S17 was the most concentrated. DetailsI ran the gel with this characteristics:
Gel imageLanes: 1. ladder 500bp 2. not interesting for this study 3. not interesting for this study 4. pBBR1MCS-5 1 5. pBBR1MCS-5 2 6. pBBR1MCS-5 DH5α 7. pBBR1MCS-5 S17 8. empty Gel analysisAll the marks are visible and in the correct place (between 4000 and 5000 bp) so I conclude that the extractions were good. The plasmid that is more concentrated is the one extracted from S17 (7th lane). The marks that are visible a little bit up the main marks are isoforms (concatenations for example). NotesThe tubes are in my rack, the next step is to make a PCR from this parts to extract the plasmid backbone.
|