IGEM:University of East Anglia (UEA), Norwich, UK/2009/Notebook/NRP-UEA-Norwich iGEM/2013/06/20: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Lucy Clark (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Lucy Clark (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| colspan="2"| | | colspan="2"| | ||
==Floor Two== | |||
A gel for the second restriction digests was set up in the morning. The result of this was also disappointing and it was unclear why it hadn't worked. After staining with ethidium bromide, the bands were a little clearer, but still unusable. Therefore a third restriction digest was set up with four samples of the iGEM plasmids and one sample of antGPneo. | A gel for the second restriction digests was set up in the morning. The result of this was also disappointing and it was unclear why it hadn't worked. After staining with ethidium bromide, the bands were a little clearer, but still unusable. Therefore a third restriction digest was set up with four samples of the iGEM plasmids and one sample of antGPneo. | ||
Revision as of 11:23, 22 August 2013
Week Three | <html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> Main project page <html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>Previous entry<html> </html>Next entry<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html> |
Floor TwoA gel for the second restriction digests was set up in the morning. The result of this was also disappointing and it was unclear why it hadn't worked. After staining with ethidium bromide, the bands were a little clearer, but still unusable. Therefore a third restriction digest was set up with four samples of the iGEM plasmids and one sample of antGPneo.
|