IGEM:University of East Anglia (UEA), Norwich, UK/2009/Notebook/NRP-UEA-Norwich iGEM/2013/09/02: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Autocreate 2013/09/02 Entry for IGEM:University_of_East_Anglia_(UEA),_Norwich,_UK/2009/Notebook/NRP-UEA-Norwich_iGEM)
 
(fix raw html notebook nav)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
|-
|-
|style="background-color: #EEE"|[[Image:igem-logo-150px.png|150px]]<span style="font-size:22px;"> iGEM Project name 1</span>
|style="background-color: #EEE"|[[Image:igem-logo-150px.png|150px]]<span style="font-size:22px;"> iGEM Project name 1</span>
|style="background-color: #F2F2F2" align="center"|<html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> [[{{#sub:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|0|-11}}|Main project page]]<br />{{#if:{{#lnpreventry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}|<html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>[[{{#lnpreventry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}{{!}}Previous entry]]<html>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</html>}}{{#if:{{#lnnextentry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}|[[{{#lnnextentry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}{{!}}Next entry]]<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html>}}
|style="background-color: #F2F2F2" align="center"|[[File:Report.png|frameless|link={{#sub:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|0|-11}}]][[{{#sub:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|0|-11}}|Main project page]]<br />{{#if:{{#lnpreventry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}|[[File:Resultset_previous.png|frameless|link={{#lnpreventry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}]][[{{#lnpreventry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}{{!}}Previous entry]]&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;}}{{#if:{{#lnnextentry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}|[[{{#lnnextentry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}{{!}}Next entry]][[File:Resultset_next.png|frameless|link={{#lnnextentry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}]]}}
|-
|-
| colspan="2"|
| colspan="2"|
==Entry title==
==Floor One==
* Insert your content here.
[[Image:GEL3.png|thumb| Fig 1. Gel showing another GUS PCR, with a 1Kb+ base ladder in lane 2 and a band of GUS product at roughly 1.8Kb in lane 3.]]
The PCR of the new GUS gene was performed (8 x 20 ul reactions of same proportions as first time round).<br>
A 1% agarose gel was made.<br>
Took photographs of all Bioassay plates where actinomycete colonies appeared to have a zone of clearing around them - indicating the production of an anti-fungal.<br>
Spore stocks were filtered, concentrated and resuspended in 20 % glycerol.<br>
Isolated Streptomyces sp. colonies from the latest soil sample plates and streaked onto new plates. <br>
Performed some streak purifications and lawns.<br>
Made 2 x 500 ml SFM (+ Ny).<br>
An agarose gel electrophoresis of the PCR products showed a fragment at approx. 1.8 Kb which is likely to be the GUS gene ''fig 1''.<br>
A PCR purification was performed - the product was spun down with PB and PE buffers. The nanodrop indicated that tbere was sufficient DNA to work with. <br>
A restriction digest was performed on pMS82 and the new GUS gene using NdeI and HindIII enzymes in Buffer B. For the GUS gene digest - 5 ul Buffer, 0.5 ul E1 (enzyme 1), 0.5 ul E2, 35 ul template and 9 ul sterile water was used. For the pMS82 digest - 5 ul Buffer, 0.5 ul E1, 0.5 ul E2, 15 ul template and 29 ul sterile water was used.


==Floor Two==
The plates that had been transformed with the ligation (J04450+neo) contained no colonies.





Latest revision as of 23:15, 26 September 2017

iGEM Project name 1 Main project page
Previous entry      Next entry

Floor One

Fig 1. Gel showing another GUS PCR, with a 1Kb+ base ladder in lane 2 and a band of GUS product at roughly 1.8Kb in lane 3.

The PCR of the new GUS gene was performed (8 x 20 ul reactions of same proportions as first time round).
A 1% agarose gel was made.
Took photographs of all Bioassay plates where actinomycete colonies appeared to have a zone of clearing around them - indicating the production of an anti-fungal.
Spore stocks were filtered, concentrated and resuspended in 20 % glycerol.
Isolated Streptomyces sp. colonies from the latest soil sample plates and streaked onto new plates.
Performed some streak purifications and lawns.
Made 2 x 500 ml SFM (+ Ny).
An agarose gel electrophoresis of the PCR products showed a fragment at approx. 1.8 Kb which is likely to be the GUS gene fig 1.
A PCR purification was performed - the product was spun down with PB and PE buffers. The nanodrop indicated that tbere was sufficient DNA to work with.
A restriction digest was performed on pMS82 and the new GUS gene using NdeI and HindIII enzymes in Buffer B. For the GUS gene digest - 5 ul Buffer, 0.5 ul E1 (enzyme 1), 0.5 ul E2, 35 ul template and 9 ul sterile water was used. For the pMS82 digest - 5 ul Buffer, 0.5 ul E1, 0.5 ul E2, 15 ul template and 29 ul sterile water was used.

Floor Two

The plates that had been transformed with the ligation (J04450+neo) contained no colonies.