IGEM:University of East Anglia (UEA), Norwich, UK/2009/Notebook/NRP-UEA-Norwich iGEM/2013/07/25

From OpenWetWare

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 6: Line 6:
| colspan="2"|
| colspan="2"|
==Floor Two==
==Floor Two==
 +
The two ligation samples from the previous day were analysed by gel electrophoresis alongside controls and the samples from the 22nd July.
 +
[[Image:BIORAD 2013-07-25 15hr 59min.JPG|thumb|Fig. Analysis of Ligation reactions by gel electrophoresis. Lane 1 and 2 (24/07 ligations), lanes 3 and 4 controls, lane 5 and 6 samples from 22nd July (2b and 2c).]]
 +
The membrane was retrieved from the shaker and washed with TBST and TBS solutions respectively for ten minutes. It was then incubated in Anti His HRP conjugate solution. After further washing the membrane was imaged using chemiluminescent detection. This gave no visible result.
The membrane was retrieved from the shaker and washed with TBST and TBS solutions respectively for ten minutes. It was then incubated in Anti His HRP conjugate solution. After further washing the membrane was imaged using chemiluminescent detection. This gave no visible result.

Revision as of 10:36, 31 July 2013

Week 8 Main project page
Previous entry      Next entry

Floor Two

The two ligation samples from the previous day were analysed by gel electrophoresis alongside controls and the samples from the 22nd July.

Fig. Analysis of Ligation reactions by gel electrophoresis. Lane 1 and 2 (24/07 ligations), lanes 3 and 4 controls, lane 5 and 6 samples from 22nd July (2b and 2c).
Fig. Analysis of Ligation reactions by gel electrophoresis. Lane 1 and 2 (24/07 ligations), lanes 3 and 4 controls, lane 5 and 6 samples from 22nd July (2b and 2c).

The membrane was retrieved from the shaker and washed with TBST and TBS solutions respectively for ten minutes. It was then incubated in Anti His HRP conjugate solution. After further washing the membrane was imaged using chemiluminescent detection. This gave no visible result.



Personal tools