IGEM:Virginia/2012/Notebook/Genetically engineered bacteriophage for diagnosis of whooping cough/2012/06/04
From OpenWetWare
(Autocreate 2012/06/04 Entry for IGEM:Virginia/2012/Notebook/Genetically_engineered_bacteriophage_for_diagnosis_of_whooping_cough) |
Current revision (20:13, 3 October 2012) (view source) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{|{{table}} width="800" | {|{{table}} width="800" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| - | |style="background-color: #EEE"|[[Image:igem-logo-150px.png|150px]]<span style="font-size:22px;"> | + | |style="background-color: #EEE"|[[Image:igem-logo-150px.png|150px]]<span style="font-size:22px;">Week 2</span> |
|style="background-color: #F2F2F2" align="center"|<html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> [[{{#sub:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|0|-11}}|Main project page]]<br />{{#if:{{#lnpreventry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}|<html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>[[{{#lnpreventry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}{{!}}Previous entry]]<html> </html>}}{{#if:{{#lnnextentry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}|[[{{#lnnextentry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}{{!}}Next entry]]<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html>}} | |style="background-color: #F2F2F2" align="center"|<html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> [[{{#sub:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|0|-11}}|Main project page]]<br />{{#if:{{#lnpreventry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}|<html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>[[{{#lnpreventry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}{{!}}Previous entry]]<html> </html>}}{{#if:{{#lnnextentry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}|[[{{#lnnextentry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}{{!}}Next entry]]<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html>}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
| colspan="2"| | | colspan="2"| | ||
| - | == | + | ==(6/4 – 6/9)== |
| - | + | Attempted genome isolation. We also familiarized ourselves with the basics of | |
| + | the Nanodrop machine. We would check by quantifying the phage genome with | ||
| + | Nanodrop. However we got a flat curve indicating that it did not work. | ||
| + | <br> | ||
| + | Sadly, chemical transformation did not work on Bordatella Bronchiseptica. | ||
| + | <br> | ||
| + | Performed gel extraction with gel a gel extraction kit along with primers | ||
| + | Started 2 300mL cultures of Bordatella Bronchiseptica, added 20 uL phage for | ||
| + | amplification and took time points. (morning and evening for 48 hours). We | ||
| + | quantified with qPCR. Ran it twice (without diluting phage from each time point). | ||
| + | PCR did not work on Bordatella plate | ||
| + | <br> | ||
| + | Tried to use a plaque assay on Bronchiseptica with differing amounts of phage to | ||
| + | quantify the different time points. | ||
| + | <br> | ||
| + | Attempted freeze/thaw transformation in Bronchiseptica, which did not work. | ||
Current revision
Week 2
| Main project page Previous entry Next entry
|
(6/4 – 6/9)Attempted genome isolation. We also familiarized ourselves with the basics of
the Nanodrop machine. We would check by quantifying the phage genome with
Nanodrop. However we got a flat curve indicating that it did not work.
| |




