IGEM:Virginia/2012/Notebook/Genetically engineered bacteriophage for diagnosis of whooping cough/2012/06/17
From OpenWetWare
< IGEM:Virginia/2012/Notebook/Genetically engineered bacteriophage for diagnosis of whooping cough | 2012 | 06(Difference between revisions)
(Autocreate 2012/06/17 Entry for IGEM:Virginia/2012/Notebook/Genetically_engineered_bacteriophage_for_diagnosis_of_whooping_cough) |
Current revision (20:16, 3 October 2012) (view source) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{|{{table}} width="800" | {|{{table}} width="800" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| - | |style="background-color: #EEE"|[[Image:igem-logo-150px.png|150px]]<span style="font-size:22px;"> | + | |style="background-color: #EEE"|[[Image:igem-logo-150px.png|150px]]<span style="font-size:22px;"> Week 4</span> |
|style="background-color: #F2F2F2" align="center"|<html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> [[{{#sub:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|0|-11}}|Main project page]]<br />{{#if:{{#lnpreventry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}|<html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>[[{{#lnpreventry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}{{!}}Previous entry]]<html> </html>}}{{#if:{{#lnnextentry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}|[[{{#lnnextentry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}{{!}}Next entry]]<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html>}} | |style="background-color: #F2F2F2" align="center"|<html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> [[{{#sub:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|0|-11}}|Main project page]]<br />{{#if:{{#lnpreventry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}|<html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>[[{{#lnpreventry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}{{!}}Previous entry]]<html> </html>}}{{#if:{{#lnnextentry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}|[[{{#lnnextentry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}{{!}}Next entry]]<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html>}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
| colspan="2"| | | colspan="2"| | ||
| - | == | + | ==(6/17 – 6/23)== |
| - | + | Attempted electrotransformation of Bordatella to electroporate DNA into the cells. | |
| + | This did not work. We found that RB50 and RB53 are not electrotransformable | ||
| + | <br> | ||
| + | Used Qiagen Viral RNA kit to purify phage genome and then did nanodrop | ||
| + | successfully. Also performed gel electrophoresis to visualize size and quantity of | ||
| + | DNA. | ||
| + | <br> | ||
| + | Performed PCR on isolated phage genome BPP | ||
| + | <br> | ||
| + | Gel electrophoresis image confirmed that the start and end of the BPP phage genome | ||
| + | were what we thought they were. | ||
| + | <br> | ||
| + | The 260/280 ratio for nanodrop of the genomic phage DNA isolation was off. It | ||
| + | needed to be closer to 1.8. | ||
| + | <br> | ||
| + | We attempted isolation of the hCG plasmid from DH5-alpha using Qiagen prep spin | ||
| + | miniprep kit. | ||
Current revision
Week 4
| Main project page Previous entry Next entry
|
(6/17 – 6/23)Attempted electrotransformation of Bordatella to electroporate DNA into the cells.
This did not work. We found that RB50 and RB53 are not electrotransformable
| |




