IGEM:Virginia/2012/Notebook/Genetically engineered bacteriophage for diagnosis of whooping cough/2012/06/24

From OpenWetWare

Jump to: navigation, search
(Autocreate 2012/06/24 Entry for IGEM:Virginia/2012/Notebook/Genetically_engineered_bacteriophage_for_diagnosis_of_whooping_cough)
Current revision (20:17, 3 October 2012) (view source)
 
(One intermediate revision not shown.)
Line 1: Line 1:
{|{{table}} width="800"
{|{{table}} width="800"
|-
|-
-
|style="background-color: #EEE"|[[Image:igem-logo-150px.png|150px]]<span style="font-size:22px;"> iGEM Project name 1</span>
+
|style="background-color: #EEE"|[[Image:igem-logo-150px.png|150px]]<span style="font-size:22px;">Week 5</span>
|style="background-color: #F2F2F2" align="center"|<html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> [[{{#sub:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|0|-11}}|Main project page]]<br />{{#if:{{#lnpreventry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}|<html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>[[{{#lnpreventry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}{{!}}Previous entry]]<html>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</html>}}{{#if:{{#lnnextentry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}|[[{{#lnnextentry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}{{!}}Next entry]]<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html>}}
|style="background-color: #F2F2F2" align="center"|<html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> [[{{#sub:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|0|-11}}|Main project page]]<br />{{#if:{{#lnpreventry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}|<html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>[[{{#lnpreventry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}{{!}}Previous entry]]<html>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</html>}}{{#if:{{#lnnextentry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}|[[{{#lnnextentry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}{{!}}Next entry]]<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html>}}
|-
|-
| colspan="2"|
| colspan="2"|
-
==Entry title==
+
==(6/24 – 6/30)==
-
* Insert your content here.
+
Performed Gibson Assembly on Luc genome and hCG genome. We then performed
 +
digest on the Gibson Assembly products. The results were hard to decipher.
 +
<br>
 +
We tried various lysis techniques such as: BPER buffer, chloroform, and RIPA buffer.
 +
<br>
 +
Bought EPT and Clearblue pregnancy test kits. Their purpose was to detect for the
 +
presence of hCG. Unfortunately we got all negative results. We tried with E. coli first,
 +
but still got negative results meaning that it did not take up the hCG gene.
 +
<br>
 +
Tried additional sonication method for lysis.
 +
<br>
 +
Digest of phage genome and vector digest both worked. During PCR purification,
 +
the products were resuspended in too large a volume, thereby making them dilute.
 +
<br>
 +
The next step was to either concentrate them or run a larger volume of digested hCG
 +
plasmid in order to detect via traniluminator.

Current revision

Week 5 Main project page
Previous entry      Next entry

(6/24 – 6/30)

Performed Gibson Assembly on Luc genome and hCG genome. We then performed digest on the Gibson Assembly products. The results were hard to decipher.
We tried various lysis techniques such as: BPER buffer, chloroform, and RIPA buffer.
Bought EPT and Clearblue pregnancy test kits. Their purpose was to detect for the presence of hCG. Unfortunately we got all negative results. We tried with E. coli first, but still got negative results meaning that it did not take up the hCG gene.
Tried additional sonication method for lysis.
Digest of phage genome and vector digest both worked. During PCR purification, the products were resuspended in too large a volume, thereby making them dilute.
The next step was to either concentrate them or run a larger volume of digested hCG plasmid in order to detect via traniluminator.



Personal tools