JC Lehmann 2006 Measuring scientific quality: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
(correction) |
(link section with some content) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
== summary == | == summary == | ||
== comments == | |||
== links == | |||
== | * [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bibliometrics Bibliometrics] Wikipedia | ||
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hirsch_index h-index] Wikipedia | |||
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impact_factor Impact factor] Wikipedia | |||
Revision as of 04:07, 5 April 2007
article
"Measure for measures"
by Sune Lehmann1, Andrew D. Jackson2 and Benny E. Lautrup2
1. Sune Lehmann is at the Department of Informatics and Mathematical Modeling, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800, Lyngby, Denmark.
2. Andrew D. Jackson and Benny E. Lautrup are at The Niels Bohr Institute, Blegdamsvej 17, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
- PMID 17183295
- Nature website
abstract
Are some ways of measuring scientific quality better than others? (there's no real abstract for this article)
summary
comments
links
- Bibliometrics Wikipedia
- h-index Wikipedia
- Impact factor Wikipedia
