Janelle N. Ruiz Assignment 4: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 50: Line 50:
[[Image:Table 3.JPG|Table 3]]
[[Image:Table 3.JPG|Table 3]]


*Task 2: Find Min and Max difference between any pair of sequences in an alignment
*Task 2: Find Min and Max difference ACROSS subjects (1, 2, & 3)
 
[[Image:Table 4.JPG|Table 4]]

Revision as of 02:24, 14 February 2010

Activity 1/Part 2: GenBank

  • Question 1: The accession number of the sequence I chose was AF016760.
  • Question 2: This HIV-1 sequence came from subject 1. The first part of the record, labeled “Definition” is the section of the record where I found this information.

GenBank Record 1

GenBank Record 1

  • Task 3: Download several (4-6) sequences in FASTA format to your local hard drive:

Activity 1/Part 3: Introduction to the Biology Workbench

  • Task 1: Select all of your sequences (seen above) using the appropriate command and run a multiple sequence alignment using Clustal W:

Activity 2/Part 1: Looking at clustering across subjects

Analysis of the 97 sequences from the 15 subjects' first visits

  • Task 1: Generate a multiple sequence analysis and distance tree for 12 of these sequences (3 clones from each of 4 subjects)

Table 2

  • Question 1: The clones from each subject do tend to cluster together, as shown by the tree above.
  • Question 2: Clones show more diversity than subject 4 clones. Subject 1 and 2 clones show similar diversity to one another and to subject 3 clones.
  • Question 3: Subject 1 and 2 clones cluster together indicating that these clones have a high genetic similarity while the clones from subject 3 and 4 have a high genetic difference from one another and from subject 1 and 2 as a group.
  • Question 4: Subject 1 and 2 clones are similar genetically indicating that thye may have a close evolutionary relationship, potentially arising from the same virus. Subject 3 clones have high genetic distance from subject 4 and 1 and 2. Subject 4 clones are more closely realted to subject 1 and 2 clones than subject 3 clones, indicating that subject 4 clones may have diverged evolutionarily more recently from 1 and 2 than Subject 3 clones.

Activity 2/Part 2: Quantifying diversity within and between subjects

  • Task 1: Find S and Theta for 3 Subjects

Table 3

  • Task 2: Find Min and Max difference ACROSS subjects (1, 2, & 3)

Table 4