Jin:Research
From OpenWetWare
(Difference between revisions)
(→Metabolic engineering 2.0) |
(→Metabolic engineering 2.0) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
===Metabolic engineering 2.0=== | ===Metabolic engineering 2.0=== | ||
Metabolic engineering is an optimization process in strain improvement. Since none of naturally existing microorganisms exhibit optimal (perfect) phenotypes for man-created (designed) bioconversion processes, cellular (metabolic) activities of microbial strains in the bioconversion process need to be optimized for the purpose. To this end, recombinant DNA technology (genetic engineering) has been employed to elicit optimal phenotypes by amplifying or reducing specific metabolic activities. With rapid advances in molecular biology, it became a relatively easy task to introduce heterologous genes or delete endogenous genes for implementing an intended phenotype. | Metabolic engineering is an optimization process in strain improvement. Since none of naturally existing microorganisms exhibit optimal (perfect) phenotypes for man-created (designed) bioconversion processes, cellular (metabolic) activities of microbial strains in the bioconversion process need to be optimized for the purpose. To this end, recombinant DNA technology (genetic engineering) has been employed to elicit optimal phenotypes by amplifying or reducing specific metabolic activities. With rapid advances in molecular biology, it became a relatively easy task to introduce heterologous genes or delete endogenous genes for implementing an intended phenotype. | ||
| - | However, the resulting phenotypes are often suboptimal due to distant effects of the genetic modifications or unknown regulatory interactions. For instance, three genes (''XYL1'', ''XYL2'', and ''XYL3'') from ''Pichia stipitis'', a xylose fermenting yeast, were introduced into ''S. cerevisiae'' for the addition of the xylose metabolic pathway. The engineered ''S. cerevisiae'' strain was able to assimilate xylose as intended, but ethanol production from xylose was insignificant unexpectedly. This is a typical pitfall of metabolic engineering 1.0 where we tried to engineer target genes based on rational or hypothesis-driven methods. Now we understand that overexpression of three genes (XYL1, XYL2, and XYL3) is not a necessary and sufficient condition but a necessary condition for efficient ethanol production from xylose. | + | However, the resulting phenotypes are often suboptimal due to distant effects of the genetic modifications or unknown regulatory interactions. For instance, three genes (''XYL1'', ''XYL2'', and ''XYL3'') from ''Pichia stipitis'', a xylose fermenting yeast, were introduced into ''S. cerevisiae'' for the addition of the xylose metabolic pathway. The engineered ''S. cerevisiae'' strain was able to assimilate xylose as intended, but ethanol production from xylose was insignificant unexpectedly. This is a typical pitfall of metabolic engineering 1.0 where we tried to engineer target genes based on rational or hypothesis-driven methods. Now we understand that overexpression of three genes (''XYL1'', ''XYL2'', and ''XYL3'') is not a necessary and sufficient condition but a necessary condition for efficient ethanol production from xylose. |
As such, an open question in metabolic engineering 2.0 is how to identify gene targets that have direct or indirect impact on a particular phenotype of interest. In order to address the problem, we propose two different (complementary) approaches: ''systematic'' and ''combinatorial'' search of gene targets. In systematic search, global stoichiometric modeling can be employed to analyze stoichiometric interactions of putative gene targets using appropriate objective functions and constraints. This method is compounded by the lack of comprehensive and accurate metabolic models that capture both reaction kinetics and genetic regulation. An alternative method for identifying gene targets, termed combinatorial search method, takes advantage of recent advances in high-throughput screening and traceable genetic perturbation. In this method a perturbation library (either overexpression or knockout) is first screened for a desirable phenotype, and the genetic modifications responsible for the desired phenotype are traced by sequencing or microarray-based methods. We have exemplified the above-mentioned methods in the context of xylose fermentation by recombinant S. cerevisiae and lycopene production by recombinant ''E. coli'' . We will continue to identify novel gene targets or genetic (metabolic) networks that impact yield and rate of xylose fermentation in recombinant ''S. cerevisiae'' through ''systematic'' and ''combinatorial'' search | As such, an open question in metabolic engineering 2.0 is how to identify gene targets that have direct or indirect impact on a particular phenotype of interest. In order to address the problem, we propose two different (complementary) approaches: ''systematic'' and ''combinatorial'' search of gene targets. In systematic search, global stoichiometric modeling can be employed to analyze stoichiometric interactions of putative gene targets using appropriate objective functions and constraints. This method is compounded by the lack of comprehensive and accurate metabolic models that capture both reaction kinetics and genetic regulation. An alternative method for identifying gene targets, termed combinatorial search method, takes advantage of recent advances in high-throughput screening and traceable genetic perturbation. In this method a perturbation library (either overexpression or knockout) is first screened for a desirable phenotype, and the genetic modifications responsible for the desired phenotype are traced by sequencing or microarray-based methods. We have exemplified the above-mentioned methods in the context of xylose fermentation by recombinant S. cerevisiae and lycopene production by recombinant ''E. coli'' . We will continue to identify novel gene targets or genetic (metabolic) networks that impact yield and rate of xylose fermentation in recombinant ''S. cerevisiae'' through ''systematic'' and ''combinatorial'' search | ||
Revision as of 15:39, 3 June 2009
Home Lab Members Research Publications Internal Contact


