Lidstrom: Tecan Plate Reader: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 22: Line 22:
** put cells in a non-fluorescent buffer.
** put cells in a non-fluorescent buffer.
*** LB is known to contain fluorescent molecules.
*** LB is known to contain fluorescent molecules.
=== Sample Protocol ==
See "Tips for Fluorescence Microplate Assays" in Invitrogen's [http://probes.invitrogen.com/media/publications/108.pdf Fluorescence Microplate Assays, 7th edition]

Revision as of 11:11, 26 August 2013

Back to Protocols

About the Tecan Infinite f500 plate reader


Fluorescence-based promoter tests

  • If you have promoters in front of a fluorescent protein and want to test the promoter strength. The answer you get will depend (nonlinearly!) on:
    • The OD of the sample matters
    • The gain you chose matters
  • Should you subtract out fluorescence of the no-promoter control or divide the test value by the control?
    • Evidence of both can be found in the literature
    • You may have negative values for some samples.
      • Is there a way to blank it??
  • Evidence that the gain and the OD of the sample matter:
    • These data represent the same E. coli line with either an empty vector control or a promoter in front of red fluorescent protein. The absorbance for each sample has been divided by OD600, then plotted as a function of OD at different gains ranging from 20 to just below saturation for the highest OD samples. The y-scales (y-axes) for each plot are free (different) -JM 8/2013
  • You should definitely:
    • Compare the test to a control at the same OD.
    • This will require doing calculations for dilutions. You cannot just assume that 5uL of each type of cells + x uL water/buffer will give you the same OD.
  • Things you should probably do:
    • put cells in a non-fluorescent buffer.
      • LB is known to contain fluorescent molecules.

= Sample Protocol

See "Tips for Fluorescence Microplate Assays" in Invitrogen's Fluorescence Microplate Assays, 7th edition