LumLatencyEffects: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Template:Holcombe}} | {{Template:Holcombe}} | ||
===Effects consistent with lower contrast yielding higher latency=== | |||
*Hess | *Hess | ||
*Pulfrich | *Pulfrich | ||
| Line 11: | Line 12: | ||
*S-cones slower | *S-cones slower | ||
**Our results show that both manual and saccadic responses are slower for S-cone stimuli. Most interestingly, this reaction time difference was twice as large for saccadic responses as for manual responses, suggesting that saccades rely more on the fast signals, not supported by S-cone stimuli, than do manual responses. In a second experiment, our participants performed temporal order judgments on pairs of luminance and S-cone stimuli. Our results show no evidence of perceived time discrepancy between the two signals, which may imply that perceptual judgments utilize different signals from either manual or saccadic responses.(Bompas & Sumner, JoV) | **Our results show that both manual and saccadic responses are slower for S-cone stimuli. Most interestingly, this reaction time difference was twice as large for saccadic responses as for manual responses, suggesting that saccades rely more on the fast signals, not supported by S-cone stimuli, than do manual responses. In a second experiment, our participants performed temporal order judgments on pairs of luminance and S-cone stimuli. Our results show no evidence of perceived time discrepancy between the two signals, which may imply that perceptual judgments utilize different signals from either manual or saccadic responses.(Bompas & Sumner, JoV) | ||
*What is Collier effect? | |||
===Exceptions=== | |||
Bachmann, Poder, and Luiga (2004) | |||
===Other effects proposed to be related to lum and latency=== | |||
*Rutschmann, R. (1966). Perception of temporal order and relative visual latency. Science, 152. TOJs to peripheral flashes indicate they're seen up to 70 msec (depending on subject) later than foveal. No attempt was made to equate visibility | *Rutschmann, R. (1966). Perception of temporal order and relative visual latency. Science, 152. TOJs to peripheral flashes indicate they're seen up to 70 msec (depending on subject) later than foveal. No attempt was made to equate visibility | ||
==Effects on response time== | ==Effects on response time== | ||
*Big question is whether lum affects stages beyond perception or is rectified thereafter. Some interesting experiments on this discussed by Jaskowski | *Big question is whether lum affects stages beyond perception or is rectified thereafter. Some interesting experiments on this discussed by Jaskowski | ||
Revision as of 03:47, 3 September 2008
Recent members• Alex Holcombe
|
Projects• Testing Booth Calendar |
|
Technical• Skills Checklist |
Other• Plots,Graphs
|
Effects consistent with lower contrast yielding higher latency
- Hess
- Pulfrich
- fluttering hearts
- anomalous motion
- Peripheral drift and rotating snakes illusion
- Contrast-dependent visual-delay illusion (Kitaoka and Ashida 2007)
- ROUFS, J. A. (1963) Perception lag as a function of stimulus luminance. Vision Res, 3,
81-91.
- faster processing of light dots then dark at motion system (M. M. Del Viva, M. Gori, & D. C. Burr, 2006)
- S-cones slower
- Our results show that both manual and saccadic responses are slower for S-cone stimuli. Most interestingly, this reaction time difference was twice as large for saccadic responses as for manual responses, suggesting that saccades rely more on the fast signals, not supported by S-cone stimuli, than do manual responses. In a second experiment, our participants performed temporal order judgments on pairs of luminance and S-cone stimuli. Our results show no evidence of perceived time discrepancy between the two signals, which may imply that perceptual judgments utilize different signals from either manual or saccadic responses.(Bompas & Sumner, JoV)
- What is Collier effect?
Exceptions
Bachmann, Poder, and Luiga (2004)
- Rutschmann, R. (1966). Perception of temporal order and relative visual latency. Science, 152. TOJs to peripheral flashes indicate they're seen up to 70 msec (depending on subject) later than foveal. No attempt was made to equate visibility
Effects on response time
- Big question is whether lum affects stages beyond perception or is rectified thereafter. Some interesting experiments on this discussed by Jaskowski
