LumNeuralLatency: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: {{Template:Holcombe}} * Lennie (1981) makes the point that when he increased background illumination, responses became more transient. Maybe this could decrease the effect of lum on laten...) |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Template:Holcombe}} | {{Template:Holcombe}} | ||
* Lennie analyzes time until cumulative spike count can reliably yield detection. I think this measure (more relevant to behavior on individual trials than any feature Maunsell points out in average PSTH) may yield greater effect of lum on latency, see Fig 5. For a dim light, you have to wait a very long time before integrated response reliably emerges from background noise. In retina anyway, time until detection really much more reflects the low peak spike count, that you have to integrate for longer with dimmer light | |||
* Lennie (1981) makes the point that when he increased background illumination, responses became more transient. Maybe this could decrease the effect of lum on latency because neural resp has to reach threshold quickly or not at all? | * Lennie (1981) makes the point that when he increased background illumination, responses became more transient. Maybe this could decrease the effect of lum on latency because neural resp has to reach threshold quickly or not at all? | ||
==REFS== | ==REFS== | ||
Lennie (1981) shows lots of data from retinal ganglion cells | Lennie (1981) shows lots of data from retinal ganglion cells | ||
Latest revision as of 04:01, 6 August 2008
Recent members• Alex Holcombe
|
Projects• Testing Booth Calendar |
|
Technical• Skills Checklist |
Other• Plots,Graphs
|
- Lennie analyzes time until cumulative spike count can reliably yield detection. I think this measure (more relevant to behavior on individual trials than any feature Maunsell points out in average PSTH) may yield greater effect of lum on latency, see Fig 5. For a dim light, you have to wait a very long time before integrated response reliably emerges from background noise. In retina anyway, time until detection really much more reflects the low peak spike count, that you have to integrate for longer with dimmer light
- Lennie (1981) makes the point that when he increased background illumination, responses became more transient. Maybe this could decrease the effect of lum on latency because neural resp has to reach threshold quickly or not at all?
REFS
Lennie (1981) shows lots of data from retinal ganglion cells
