LumNeuralLatency

From OpenWetWare
Revision as of 04:01, 6 August 2008 by Alex O. Holcombe (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Recent members

Alex Holcombe
• Ryo Nakayama



Technical

Skills Checklist
Python Programming
Psychopy/VisionEgg Installation Notes
R analysis,plot,stats
Statistics
Buttonbox
Buttonbox with photocell
Programming Cheat Sheets


  • Lennie analyzes time until cumulative spike count can reliably yield detection. I think this measure (more relevant to behavior on individual trials than any feature Maunsell points out in average PSTH) may yield greater effect of lum on latency, see Fig 5. For a dim light, you have to wait a very long time before integrated response reliably emerges from background noise. In retina anyway, time until detection really much more reflects the low peak spike count, that you have to integrate for longer with dimmer light
  • Lennie (1981) makes the point that when he increased background illumination, responses became more transient. Maybe this could decrease the effect of lum on latency because neural resp has to reach threshold quickly or not at all?

REFS

Lennie (1981) shows lots of data from retinal ganglion cells