Michael R. Pina Week 3: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: ==Introduction== *Because the rate at which HIV replicates is so high, variants that are best suited to the environment arise and spread very quickly. **This is essentially extremely fast ...)
(No difference)

Revision as of 01:22, 8 February 2010

Introduction

  • Because the rate at which HIV replicates is so high, variants that are best suited to the environment arise and spread very quickly.
    • This is essentially extremely fast evolution.
  • Unstable host environments can have variable effects.
    • It could lead to a dynamic immune response that would lead to little diversity.
    • Or the immune response could target only the most numerous variants, leading to a broader diversity.
  • Previous studies did not examine sequence patterns, and did not analyze enough "time points" in each subject.
    • This study examines higher levels of diversity correlating with rapid CD4 T cell decline.

Methods

  • 15 participants were selected from those who participated in ALIVE (injection drug users.)
    • Blood was collected every 6 months for testing over 4 years.
      • Rapid progressors = fewer than 200 CD4 T cells
      • Moderate progressors = 200-650
      • Nonprogressors = above 650
  • 285 bp region of env was amplified from PBMC.
  • env primers were used for cloning purposes, to find certain sequences.
  • Plasma viral load was determined by reverse transcription–PCR
  • Phylogenetic trees were made using a computer package.
    • Taxon labels were used to show the time where each train was isolated and number of identical replicates.
  • Units of analysis were defined by pairs of visits from each individual.
    • 26 time points were collected from the 15 participants
    • Sequence data and CD4 T cell count were known 1 year later.
  • dS/dN ratios used the Jukes-Cantor correction method.
    • Summary of this data was used for all subsequent analysis.

Results

  • CD4 decline varied across participants
    • Nonprogressor groups generally had lower viral load.
  • Sequence analysis focused on env region because it is important in host-virus interaction and tolerates mutation
    • 873 clones were analyzed
  • Changes in HIV-1 sequences were defined by diversity at each visit and divergence.
  • Viruses from 13 of the participants were originally homogeneous; 2 were heterogenous.
  • Diversity and divergence increased over time in all progressor categories.
  • Diversity and divergence were negatively correlated with CD4 T cell count 1 year later.
  • Rapid and moderate progressors showed a dS/dN ratio of 0.4, which nonprogressors showed a ratio of 1.6.
    • A ratio of 1 indicates randomly occurring mutation
  • Phylogenetic trees did not show predominance of a single strain.

Discussion

  • Higher diversity and divergence are associated with a decline in CD4 T cells.
  • Strains found in nonprogressors showed a possible selection against amino acid change; those in progressors showed selection for change.
  • The relationship between CD4 T cell decline and increased diversity and divergence agrees with the hypothesis of Nowak.
    • For those subjects who contracted AIDS, diversity and divergence continued to increase
  • Optimum environment for the virus could be continually changing because of different immune responses.
  • A more effective immune response may be seen in the nonprogressors.