Michael R. Pina Week 3: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: ==Introduction== *Because the rate at which HIV replicates is so high, variants that are best suited to the environment arise and spread very quickly. **This is essentially extremely fast ...) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 01:22, 8 February 2010
Introduction
- Because the rate at which HIV replicates is so high, variants that are best suited to the environment arise and spread very quickly.
- This is essentially extremely fast evolution.
- Unstable host environments can have variable effects.
- It could lead to a dynamic immune response that would lead to little diversity.
- Or the immune response could target only the most numerous variants, leading to a broader diversity.
- Previous studies did not examine sequence patterns, and did not analyze enough "time points" in each subject.
- This study examines higher levels of diversity correlating with rapid CD4 T cell decline.
Methods
- 15 participants were selected from those who participated in ALIVE (injection drug users.)
- Blood was collected every 6 months for testing over 4 years.
- Rapid progressors = fewer than 200 CD4 T cells
- Moderate progressors = 200-650
- Nonprogressors = above 650
- Blood was collected every 6 months for testing over 4 years.
- 285 bp region of env was amplified from PBMC.
- env primers were used for cloning purposes, to find certain sequences.
- Plasma viral load was determined by reverse transcription–PCR
- Phylogenetic trees were made using a computer package.
- Taxon labels were used to show the time where each train was isolated and number of identical replicates.
- Units of analysis were defined by pairs of visits from each individual.
- 26 time points were collected from the 15 participants
- Sequence data and CD4 T cell count were known 1 year later.
- dS/dN ratios used the Jukes-Cantor correction method.
- Summary of this data was used for all subsequent analysis.
Results
- CD4 decline varied across participants
- Nonprogressor groups generally had lower viral load.
- Sequence analysis focused on env region because it is important in host-virus interaction and tolerates mutation
- 873 clones were analyzed
- Changes in HIV-1 sequences were defined by diversity at each visit and divergence.
- Viruses from 13 of the participants were originally homogeneous; 2 were heterogenous.
- Diversity and divergence increased over time in all progressor categories.
- Diversity and divergence were negatively correlated with CD4 T cell count 1 year later.
- Rapid and moderate progressors showed a dS/dN ratio of 0.4, which nonprogressors showed a ratio of 1.6.
- A ratio of 1 indicates randomly occurring mutation
- Phylogenetic trees did not show predominance of a single strain.
Discussion
- Higher diversity and divergence are associated with a decline in CD4 T cells.
- Strains found in nonprogressors showed a possible selection against amino acid change; those in progressors showed selection for change.
- The relationship between CD4 T cell decline and increased diversity and divergence agrees with the hypothesis of Nowak.
- For those subjects who contracted AIDS, diversity and divergence continued to increase
- Optimum environment for the virus could be continually changing because of different immune responses.
- A more effective immune response may be seen in the nonprogressors.