Michael R. Pina Week 4: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
*The Biology Workbench does not seem the most user friendly, but it works just fine and gets the job done. I was able to align 4 sequences acquired from GenBank without any problems. | *The Biology Workbench does not seem the most user friendly, but it works just fine and gets the job done. I was able to align 4 sequences acquired from GenBank without any problems. | ||
===Activity 2=== | ===Activity 2=== | ||
====Part 1: Looking at clustering across subjects==== | |||
My tree (linked below) shows that at the first visit, clones within each subject are clustered pretty close together which shows that there is not a lot of divergence. Subject 3 shows the most diversity from the others as it it is the furthest from the middle point. | My tree (linked below) shows that at the first visit, clones within each subject are clustered pretty close together which shows that there is not a lot of divergence. Subject 3 shows the most diversity from the others as it it is the furthest from the middle point. | ||
====Part 2: Quantifying diversity within and between subjects==== | |||
[[Image:Mpina_table3.png]] | |||
Table 3 | |||
[[Image:Mpina_table4.png]] | |||
Table 4 | |||
====Files==== | ====Files==== | ||
[[Media:Mpina visit 1 S1 S9.txt|Visit 1, subjects 1-9]] | [[Media:Mpina visit 1 S1 S9.txt|Visit 1, subjects 1-9]] | ||
Revision as of 20:43, 14 February 2010
Activity 1
- The accession number of the sequence is AF016768.
- The sequence comes from subject 1; the definition section of the record contains this information as well as other information such as which visit.
- The Biology Workbench does not seem the most user friendly, but it works just fine and gets the job done. I was able to align 4 sequences acquired from GenBank without any problems.
Activity 2
Part 1: Looking at clustering across subjects
My tree (linked below) shows that at the first visit, clones within each subject are clustered pretty close together which shows that there is not a lot of divergence. Subject 3 shows the most diversity from the others as it it is the furthest from the middle point.
Part 2: Quantifying diversity within and between subjects
Table 3
Table 4
