Michael R. Pina Week 4: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
*The Biology Workbench does not seem the most user friendly, but it works just fine and gets the job done. I was able to align 4 sequences acquired from GenBank without any problems. | *The Biology Workbench does not seem the most user friendly, but it works just fine and gets the job done. I was able to align 4 sequences acquired from GenBank without any problems. | ||
===Activity 2=== | ===Activity 2=== | ||
My tree (linked below) shows that at the first visit, clones within each subject are clustered pretty close together. Subject 3 shows the most divergence from the others. | |||
====Files==== | ====Files==== | ||
[[Media:Mpina visit 1 S1 S9.txt|Visit 1, subjects 1-9]] | [[Media:Mpina visit 1 S1 S9.txt|Visit 1, subjects 1-9]] | ||
Revision as of 12:32, 9 February 2010
Activity 1
- The accession number of the sequence is AF016768.
- The sequence comes from subject 1; the definition section of the record contains this information as well as other information such as which visit.
- The Biology Workbench does not seem the most user friendly, but it works just fine and gets the job done. I was able to align 4 sequences acquired from GenBank without any problems.
Activity 2
My tree (linked below) shows that at the first visit, clones within each subject are clustered pretty close together. Subject 3 shows the most divergence from the others.
