MichaelsSNoteBook/2008-4-18: Difference between revisions
(A) |
|||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
= rosetta design = | = rosetta design = | ||
1J2A-1CLH nomin high energy NMR | |||
1MG4-1UF0 nomin X-ray higher energy | |||
1UOH-1TR4 nomin high energy x-ray > cutoff | |||
1C44-1QND nomin high energy x-ray | |||
1GNU-1KOT nomin high energy x-ray | |||
1IFB-1AEL nomin high energy NMR | |||
1BED-2IJY high energy X-ray | |||
1IFB-1AEL E2_1000 NMR energy > cutoff | |||
= SCADS = | = SCADS = |
Revision as of 15:57, 18 April 2008
04/18/08
Soo iterative rosetta design is running but takes a while.
In the meanwhile, Iam about to analyze the data a little bid more. I made the energy scatter plots today, looks pretty promising.
Stuff I need to do to analyze the data:
investigate following structure pairs
rosetta design
1J2A-1CLH nomin high energy NMR 1MG4-1UF0 nomin X-ray higher energy 1UOH-1TR4 nomin high energy x-ray > cutoff 1C44-1QND nomin high energy x-ray 1GNU-1KOT nomin high energy x-ray 1IFB-1AEL nomin high energy NMR 1BED-2IJY high energy X-ray 1IFB-1AEL E2_1000 NMR energy > cutoff
SCADS
1. 1IFB-1AEL nomin nothing there 2. 1J2A-1CLH nomin no NMR data
should investigate the rest to dobble check to. seems 1IFB-1AEL and 1J2A-1CLH are pretty bad structures.
Additionally, I should divide my stuff into 4 groups. 1. X-ray better before min 2. NMR better before min
3. X-ray better after E2 100 4. NMR better after E2 100
perform for EACH structure pair! It's gonna help me to overlay subsets for every method, maybe I can identify subsets which have the same property for each method (would be awesome)
Check for differences and similarities: some ideas: 1. Fold 2. Sequence lenght 3. rotamericity 4. quality scores 5. Joint RMSD, RMSD, epsilon, fraction core atoms 6. aromatics (and other known issues)
thats it :)