OSDD:Huh?

From OpenWetWare

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 23: Line 23:
'''Crowdsourcing'''
'''Crowdsourcing'''
-
Several highly successful ''crowdsourcing'' experiments have emerged in which tasks are distributed to thousands of participants, such as the [http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/nature09304 Foldit] and [http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13490.x Galaxyzoo] projects. What is notable about such cases is the speed with which the science progresses through the harnessing of what has been termed the “cognitive surplus”.[Shirky, C. Cognitive Surplus: Creativity and Generosity in a Connected Age; Penguin, 2010.]
+
The use of a widely distributed set of participants to accelerate a project is a strategy that has been widely employed in many areas. The writing of the Oxford English Dictionary made use of volunteers to identify the first uses, or best examples of the use, of words.[see The Professor and the Madman, Simon Winchester, XXX]. Pioneering work on distribution of computing power required on science projects (where the science itself was not necessarily an open activity) was achieved with the SETI@Home and Folding@Home projects.<br>
 +
With the rise of the web, several highly successful ''crowdsourcing'' experiments have emerged in which tasks are distributed to thousands of human participants, such as the [http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/nature09304 Foldit] and [http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13490.x Galaxyzoo] projects. What is notable about such cases is the speed with which the science progresses through the harnessing of what has been termed the “cognitive surplus”.[Shirky, C. Cognitive Surplus: Creativity and Generosity in a Connected Age; Penguin, 2010.]
'''Open science'''
'''Open science'''
'''Open Source Drug Discovery'''
'''Open Source Drug Discovery'''

Revision as of 20:34, 3 July 2011

Open Source Research Home        Malaria        Tuberculosis        Links       


Open Source Drug Discovery (OSDD) is the application of methods widely employed in open source software development to the process of drug discovery - that all data and ideas are freely shared between participants and that anyone may take part.

Open source software development

There are many examples of high quality, robust and widely used applications that were developed by an open source model. In these cases the development was open to anyone, and the final product emerged from a distributed team of participants. In many cases a kernel of work was funded, while the extra development by the community was not.

Open data Many valuable initiatives advocating open data have emerged in which large datasets are deposited to assist groups of researchers (e.g., Pubchem, ChEBI and SAGE Commons); the release of the GSK data falls into this class. These important ventures employ the internet merely as an information resource, rather than as a means for active collaboration.

For people to work together on the web, data must be freely available. Thus the posting of open data is a necessary but not sufficient condition for open science to happen. Available data may be used by anyone with no requirement to work with anyone. As an example, the deposition of malaria bioactivity data in mid-2010 was a significant contribution to the field, but use of the data does not oblige the user to collaborate with anyone.

Open Innovation and Prize-based Incentives

As an effort to stimulate innovation, several pharma companies have adopted an "open innovation" model. This is a somewhat nebulous term that means companies must try to bring in the best external ideas to complement in-house research.NRDD Article The mechanisms of bringing in new ideas are:

  • Prizes for solutions to problems (e.g., Innocentive). A competition means that teams work in isolation and do not pool ideas. Such a mechanism does not change the nature of the research, rather the motivation to participate. The pharmaceutical industry itself essentially already operates on this model.
  • Licensing agreements with academic groups/start-ups (e.g., Eli Lilly’s PD2 program). In such arrangements, companies may purchase the rights to promising ideas. Vigilance of intellectual property may of course shut down any open collaboration at a promising stage. It has therefore been proposed to limit open innovation science to “pre-competitive areas” (e.g., toxicology) but to date the industry has been unable to define what the term “pre-competitive” means beyond the avoidance of duplication of effort and the requirement for public-domain information resources.NRDD article

For more on this distinction see Will Spooner's article.

Crowdsourcing

The use of a widely distributed set of participants to accelerate a project is a strategy that has been widely employed in many areas. The writing of the Oxford English Dictionary made use of volunteers to identify the first uses, or best examples of the use, of words.[see The Professor and the Madman, Simon Winchester, XXX]. Pioneering work on distribution of computing power required on science projects (where the science itself was not necessarily an open activity) was achieved with the SETI@Home and Folding@Home projects.
With the rise of the web, several highly successful crowdsourcing experiments have emerged in which tasks are distributed to thousands of human participants, such as the Foldit and Galaxyzoo projects. What is notable about such cases is the speed with which the science progresses through the harnessing of what has been termed the “cognitive surplus”.[Shirky, C. Cognitive Surplus: Creativity and Generosity in a Connected Age; Penguin, 2010.]

Open science

Open Source Drug Discovery

Personal tools